Posted:Sun Dec 7, 2008 5:52 PM CST
Can India and Pakistan Walk Away From The Brink?
Mumbai is the second time that Lashkar-e-Toiba has put the two countries on a war footing. In 2002 each mobilized one million men for nearly a year after Lashkar attacked the Indian parliament. The recent Mumbai attacks have led to rising public anger in India against Pakistan and some have even called on Asif Ali Zardari to go to war.
With goals of creating a fundamentalist Islamic Caliphate in the region, Lashkar-e-Toiba and Al Qaeda have found themselves with common beliefs and, enemies. With Pakistani forces besieging Taliban, Al Qaeda and other militant groups on the border with Afghanistan as well as US and NATO forces, the news that Obama is planning on sending over twenty thousand more troops cannot come as welcome news. Hence, this is a strategic ploy to provoke the two old enemies - India and Pakistan - with a terrorist attack that pulls attention away from the tribal areas.
There are three strategies involved here;
1. To precipitate a build up of Indian forces which would force Pakistan to pull troops from tribal areas and the Western border with Afghanistan to the Indian border;
2. Provide a more complicated problem for US and NATO forces to deal with other than finding and targeting Taliban, Al Qaeda and other Islamist Radical Jihadists; and
3. Possibly, with well timed yet steady terrorist attacks actually push the two into war itself. A war which would only have one winner - those who are not in power at this moment and thus, have everything to gain and little to lose. If the two countries build up forces in anticipation of possible hostilities, they will be acting out the script laid out for them by Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Toiba and, setting the stage for the next act(s).
Many believe that the Pakistan government, army or its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) were behind the attack however, with Islamists threatening to throw Pakistan into revolution, it can hardly afford a rise in tensions with India when it is rife with problems such as a huge economic crisis, insurgencies in Balochistan/North West Frontier Province, rising violence in Karachi and one-third of the country out of control of any constitutional authority.
Certainly Pakistan needs to take uncomfortable actions by taking a more aggressive stance against these groups and, stop being reluctant to deal with the insurgency in the tribal areas. Another action that needs to be maintained and, cultivated is the peace process with India. Every effort should be made to have transparency and scaling down of forces in order to maintain the shaky trust that has been built up. Pakistan's other problems could well overwhelm the government - a troop mobilization is the last thing it needs.
Here, US Secretary of State Condelizza rice is key for both these parties and, it is not lost that she has gone to the region to further broker this process and, not let the two regress into the script written by the Islamist Radical groups who seek to orchestrate this misadventure. Possibly, if there is cooperation on both sides, they may even agree to find solutions for perplexing problems such as Kashmir in the process.
India in turn has it’s own problems in that public sentiment towards the weak government cries out for revenge, not further trust with Pakistan, the country where these acts originated and, to invoke stronger anti terrorism measures.
It seems clear that if both countries are to not only survive this crisis and actually move ahead with some positive results, they may actually have to defy the mood and opinion of their people of their respective countries to do so. In any case, to even maintain the shaky peace involved, they will have some hard times ahead of them simply to keep their governments heads above the public sentiment.