The evidence to prove the theory of evolution is w

wave Hi everybody! Some evidences to prove the theory of evolution is wrong.
Thank you for reading.

Today, Darwin's theory of evolution is widely known and it was incorporated into the School. Full name is Charles Darwin Darwin, lived around the 19th century.
>> Fact of Evolution: The drawings of Haeckel's fake embryo, frequently lie centuries (part 1)
>> Fact of Evolution: The drawings of Haeckel's fake embryo, frequently lie century (part 2)
1842, Charles Darwin penned the first sketches for the book came to be called "Origin of Species" (On the Origin of Species).
1859, Darwin published his book "The Origin of Species". The book explains in detail about 'natural selection', said that 'the population of the species evolve over generations' is through a process called 'natural selection.' Evolution launched in this book is also explained on the way, how was that for Evolution has been widely accepted.
According to Darwin's theory of evolution: humans evolved from ape ancient ancestry comments African apes. Charles Darwin was the first to assume that gibbon African origin of humans in his 'Origin of Species' 1859. This implies that humans do not have a special place in the universe nothing.
At the outset, it has always been the community of science and public opposition, it creates controversy and discussions on the basis of Philosophy, Sciences .. It is also objectionable from other theories and religion until today. Thus although it is debatable, no final conclusions about human origins, it was a puzzle unsolved, but in some countries the Orient, theory of evolution was put on preaching taught as an absolute truth in the Secondary Education program.
So let's skip all religious backgrounds, or other theories, let's use evidence to prove the fact view is truly Evolution true or false:
According to Darwin's theory of evolution, admits that all animals have evolved from low to high, according to this theory, humans evolved from apes neck. According to archaeological documents are discovered, they determine the age of ancient ape fossils that, the analysis showed that radiocarbon process ancient apes evolved into not more than 10 million people a year. Another one is, the ancient apes evolved into humans, and from humans that gradually formed its civilization today. In other words, the so only a single civilization of humans today, as humans evolved from an ape single neck to today then formed civilization. On earth has the oldest civilization is 5000 thousand years, according to some archaeological documents they say it is about 7000 years. Thus said, the process of human and ape evolution civilization form, although any way the existence of civilization that is not more than 10,000 years.
But there is evidence that ancient mosaic discovered today, is very contradictory with the above.
First Proof, In India it was discovered an iron bar to 99.72% rate is pure iron. Excerpted from conference reports for "IRON PILLAR DELHI" held in 2005.
"The chemical analysis Carried out in the earlier years have indicated it is made of pure mà wrought iron containing a high of 99.72 Proportion of phosphorous and sulfur little. Carried out by researchers Subsequent Investigations using electron probe the presence of Cu báo Examination (of 0.03%), Ni (12:05%) and Mn (12:07%). "
Embedded image from another site

The level of human metallurgy current can not produce iron with such purity, so who produce it? Humans currently can not produce it, then go back in history, if Darwin's theory of evolution, monkeys should any of the many millions of years ago has been a remarkable level of metallurgical versus species people today. So this is a proof that man can not evolve from ape-neck yet.
Post Comment

Comments (29)

Second evidence, William J. Meister, an American, who collected fossils avid amateurs, and conducted an astonishing discovery on 01 June 1968. In Antelope Springs, about 43 miles northwest of Delta, Utah, a place rich in fossils, William J. Meister found a large rock with a human footprint. This footprint, however, seems to be generated by a slipper (sandals). The sandal measured 10 inches (about 26 cm) in length, wide soles, 3 inches (or 8.9 cm) and the heel a width of 3 inches (or 7.6 cm). Heel seems approximately 1/8 the thickness (or 1.7 cm). Surprisingly, he also found identical fossil species chlorophyll Tam (trilobite) right in her footsteps.

Three identical chlorophyll is a small sea creatures, exist in the range of 260 to 600 million years ago, and this is a sign that this valuable discovery for the origin of life of prehistoric man . Approximately 260 to 600 years ago, according to Darwin's theory of evolution, humans are not even monkeys at that time, so ask who has left his footprints, then also no civilization, monkeys that perhaps legs like that. Is not this adding further evidence to prove that the theory of evolution is wrong?
Embedded image from another site

Third evidence, 1880, J. D. Whitney geologist from California, United States has published a long article, which describes the tools found in the gold mines in California. These tools include a few spears, stones and pestle stone bowl. They are found in a layer of rocks half had never been touched, located deep in the gold mines. Geologists have confirmed that these rocks could have been formed from 9 to 55 million years ago. If pursuant to Darwin's theory of evolution can not explain.
@ Small Angel - wave ... Man has been here on earth many times, and knocked down. Only a select few have survived each time throughout the millennia to carry on. I think we are heading for the same "knock-out punch" that comes full circle, and begins all over again.

This would explain all the presently "inexplicable" ancient artefacts/ancient texts which allude to the "Gods"/"Ancient Astronaut" theories such as Sitchin’s and Danniken’s work refer to.
We are now presently cloning living animals (maybe humans), we travel in "chariots of fire" (rockets/jets), are we about to close the "circle" and become "Gods" also? To be remembered as "Gods" by some future race of humans?


... grin hug wine
Hi Hans wave Thank you for your comment. Love you.hug
Miners at Klerksdorp in South Africa has found several hundred metal spheres in the earth's crust along a floor, with estimates dating to 2.8 billion years old. These spheres are very finely etched grooves, which specialists concluded that they can not be formed from a natural process.
It's just a few of the myriad of scientific evidence discovered, most of the findings of scientists today huge difference with the current human perspective, even in conflict with the content of the book we are studying textbooks.
Thus we can conclude for sure, theory of evolution is just a bunch of theories, is complicated and has a lot of loopholes big blind worship in some countries. Thus, it creates a wrong perception to human commands, and make people forget his true origins, humans have originated from? The debate between "the Creator - evolved", this time, did people need to recognize that the "Creator" that religion comes to reasonable?

According Beforeitsnews

Thank you for reading. teddybear
Hi wave there ls a lot of information here about evolution.
Whether man evolved or was created either way there is a
Creator. A higher being. Atheists make me laugh. I saw Stephen
Fry lnterviewed (atheist). He dismisses everything yet when asked
What he would ask God he has a List as long as your arm.

I will not offer my own personal beliefs here or on any other
Forum with relative strangers

Well done with your research here.
Its a good blog and maybe at an earlier time lt would
Get a lively discussion going wow manuman7thumbs up
wave Thank you Manuman for your comment. I have read a interesting article else, but it is in Vietnamese language that I can not take a copy from that site to get a translation on Google translate, the article is very long text, it is great if you could do something to translate it. This is the link:

Thank you again. Love you. teddybear
@manuman
Whether man evolved or was created either way there is a
Creator.
But then naturally, a question lingers in the background, suspended and unanswered, "who created the creator?"
"...who created the creator?"

In other words, who created the creator before(!) creation.
The question presumes the existence of time prior to creation.
Our current understanding is trending toward the view that time is a dimension, rather than simply the movement of matter through space.
As time is part of creation, there was no 'before' creation;
the creator is outside time.

This doesn't answer the question, but puts the relationship between creator/creation into a different frame of reference.

It's been said the human mind finds it as difficult to comprehend 'nothing' as it does 'infinity'...perhaps even more so.

A most interesting blog, Littleangel

cowboy
wave Let's start with poor Charles himself. " lived around
the 19th century " That's as close as you can nail it?
Could have used Google for that one. The city of Damascus itself, has been proven that people lived collectively there
for 10,000 years. Human's were not the only creature to evolve.
Darwin studied the most adaptable creature to prove his theory,
the common insect. In this case, the Beetle. Even at a distance
of less than a mile, he noticed an evolution of the insect.
I'm guessing the purpose of this blog, is to knock Evolution,
so you can feel comfortable with what is written in a book
1750 years ago. You did not mention the missing link. As another
poster said, some earlier examples of ancient man did not survive to perpetuate.
I have read many books on both -creator and evolution both sides very interesting.
But the here and now, we are here however or which way and some earthly problems are to be solved. I concentrate on that now.

Time too is a man made thing but I believe if we do not tackle here and now we will not be here to debate at all.teddybear teddybear teddybear

Still a most interesting blog and all info gathered.thumbs up
Small thanks for all these array of information. Very interesting and intriguing.
I do believe in a super being called God. And that is my belief that will not change. wave
iotaoo
The question looks interesting, I don't know there anyone who could answer it, but for me I think that one day in the future when I would get a good chance .., I shall question to My God Creator, " My God. Who created you?"
Thank you for your comment. Love you.
teddybear
miclee
Thank you for the compliment. I just copy from a Web site, feeling it quite interesting so I want to share on here for everyone could read if want to. Love you.
teddybear
pedanguy
Thank you for your comment. Love you.
teddybear
Redex
Thank you for your comment. I like who a lot of reading like you, hopefully I shall recieved some good knowledges from you. Love you.
teddybear
lindsy
I am too, like you, believe in God. Thank you for your nice comment. Love you. teddybear
Very interesting blog,and an enjoyable read..

I myself have no clue or no answers to the whole evolution/creator etc etc script..Mysteries that mankind will never know in my view,but our thirst for answers will always be.

Perhaps in death all the answers to lifes mysteries will be revealed to us dunno

Evolution however does still seem the most logical possibility to me personally...

A creator..If this was the case then its far far too complex for my mind to even think about the hows/whys/ifs/buts etc...

Though im guessing it couldnt just be some guy sat with pencil and paper then nipping to the toolshed and knocking up a few items here and there... I think..professor bouquet
My Son that has create the first reprogrammed Stem Cell her on this little Planet and can not work with the Human Body,without knowing in detail about DNA and Genes,told me,that by manipulating DNA,where are genes for all other living things in the Human body,it is possible to get the body from a already living Human to start to change,to what ever animal.....like to a big Mouse or what ever else,so there is no doubt,evolution is there,no matter we want it or not.
That is why he said,that Humans are not on the level yet,for all the knowledge he has got and that he has to take some of it with him when he die.

Yes,there is a higher Intelligence involved,that has create not only our Universe,but perhaps billions of Universes,but it has nothing to do with Man made Gods or Religions and we are for sure not the only Intelligent life that exist,instead there are perhaps billions of different other,some on lower level as we are,some on clearly higher level and some of them could have own made Gods too,that are not looking like Santa,but similar to what they look by them self.

Rolf
I know that there are findings,that is far back in time,but I believe,that life and evolution has started several times here on Earth and if we destroy the living here on our Planet,what looks to be very close to happen,it could take a long time again,but sooner or later the evolution process start again,because,that is what I believe is the hole meaning in all existence,in some way a self creation process....we Humans are just so eager to make us self the special one,it is already so easy to see how we act with all other living things.

Rolf
Hans,

I just realize,that your realistic thinking,is so very close to how I think too....and I have the Books written by the Authors you are mentioning too wine

Rolf
semsu
Thank you for your comment. I think you have a clever son, and your son maybe with some genetic genes from you? Love you.
teddybear
avias
Thank you for your comment. I do like all what you said a lot, clearlly you are one of the best clever women I have known. Love you. teddybear
twazzle
Thank you for your comment. Wishing our thirst for answers will always be. Love you. teddybear
Reading some of this doesn't make me wonder why some cultures and people still live in the stone age.
KN, I have a picture for you. Are they?grin
Love you teddybear
Embedded image from another site
That is they type of comment I expected. wine
the Meister footprints are "misinterpreted"; so that case is closed
And you can't disprove evolution because a footprint might have happened.
or a bar of iron is there.

Evolution is a natural process still ongoing. - that something (a piece of metal) existed 55million years ago and we don't know why or how. - does not disprove a natural process.
The natural process is quite proven, and the DNA evidence is quite formidable.

I can start to say that aliens left your metal piece there and therefor it weren't the humans. My claim is just as provable as the claim that humans did it.
Except that chances are bigger to find aliens than to find prove of humans at that time period.

And the start of your blog you actually try to tell that humans are special compared to other animals, you try to attack evolution to get that point defended.

Please don't blame or react to scientists researching because of your worldview.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.