Sommerauer71 Forum Posts

This is a list of forum posts made by Sommerauer71
Forums Home » Sommerauer71 Forum Posts
THREAD AUTHOR



Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
seekndestroy: because society in general and government in particular are not equipped to deal with every situation on an individual basis, thus the only way that they can efficiently provide the best service for EVERYONE is to set up regulations to cover every situation, however, since every situation is unique, it is simply impossible to deal with each and every one of them accurately....

as a result the commonly standard procedure is for the women to have custody... as there have been an unfortunate large number of fathers who did not care for their kids (deadbeat dads). subsequently for a woman NOT to be granted custody, there has to be a significantly detrimental issue or issues to justify said action.... as a result, the assumption is that if a mother does not have custody, then she is somehow an unfit mom....

on the flip side, there are many fathers who are dealing with the backlash of this unfair system, one that automatically assumes the mother is better suited to be a parent and that the father is not....

the day that society (and thus its government) start dealing with each situation and its uniqueness, will be the day where women (like the one you know) and men will finally see fairness on how they are allowed to raise their children


You just summed up my thread in a few paragraphs, SND...

I'll do a more detailed response later.


Good morning from Europe...


Mothers apart from their children.: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
Ambrose2007: This is confusing? Are you the king or the queen, T? Because I'd like to be king...just think of the delightful intellectual chaos and anarchy that would flow from my rule.


I've no bloody idea...

I thought MF might let me know one of these days...

If I am made Queen, then you will not be my King, simply because I do not fancy the wrath of GG...


Would you leave your love for your children?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
venere08: I'm 158cm, that's 5'2.5"


When we meet, in Italy, with Summer, should we not wear shoes?


Has to be done, tips on being a Mother in Law..: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
cristina: I thought I'd go off topic on my own thread!

VENERE!

Did you see Berlusconi hanging up the phone during a confrotation with oposition on TV programme? Gosh, he's the boss
Do you know if he declined to participate of the programme or was he upsent because of his agenda? He spoke loud, whatever he said I couldn't understand because he was talking in Italian and the subtiles were in Dutch. I didnt bother. But..heh heh



That's unusual for you Cris, to go off topic on your own thread!

Sorry, that was for Ven...

bouquet


If you're not beautiful, you don't get a job!: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
venere08: Hey ginger, a lovely range, thank you for that link. A couple particularly caught my eye, such as the little black jacket, and one or 2 of the skirts, though I prefer them to be much shorter given my height. I did notice it was the 2006 range, and couldn't find their recent catalogue. Just out of interest and for ideas.

BTW...if I recall correctly, Mike is quite the couturier himself.

Sommer might want to commission him!

Imagine, flying over to Spain for fittings!!!


Ginger is just wonderul.

Hi Ven.

How tall are you?

I am 5'6"


Has to be done, tips on being a Mother in Law..: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
gingerb: Glad you liked them Sommer. I only had to think about your figure and personality to know these would suit you.


You just knew, didn't you?


Has to be done, tips on being a Mother in Law..: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
mike69spain: I would today not date a virgin if I was "out shopping", but that has nothing to do with age, rather the idea that I want her to have found her own sexual identity long before I showed up.

With virgin I mean a person that have had only thoughts about sex, no level of actual physical activity.

Hence... a "real virgin" would in my book not even have masturbated, only thought about it.


Hello Mike...

I could have written the same, but Dr Who has written some stuff that has made me rethink...

I cannot put this down to inexperience, I find his posts completely open, fascinating almost tinged with sadness that he has never experienced intimacy as you, I and many others have...

But more than anything that touches me, is his clear honesty.

There are no lies, there is little that he shys away from, he has handled the jibes, the ridicule, indeed this thread title suggests that it is somewhat geared toward him. I could be wrong, barking up the wrong tree, but an experienced man does not have the crown of being able to satisfy a woman...

I see it like this, a virgin of 40 could probably instill much more attention on a woman than say a man who has had 40 women, because he is concentrating on one, as opposed to hanging off his own shirt sleeve that he has shagged 40 women???

When I was in Sweden, I met a British man who banged on for hours about the women he had bedded, it did nothing for me, in fact it made me bare my teeth in an unpleasant way.

Do you see where I am coming from?


WOULD ANY ONE DATE A 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN???: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
onelinermadness: past experiences sommer ???


No, just an ability to be more than one dimensional...

bouquet


WOULD ANY ONE DATE A 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN???: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
onelinermadness: ......B very weary of men,who are out after all they can get.....the whole venerale spectrum and maybe love too.....


How wonderful.

I know, imagine, that a 40 year old virgin has the ability to love...


WOULD ANY ONE DATE A 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN???: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
ContraryCol: Have you ever enjoyed the company of a person so much prior to meeting them that you have ignored your first impressions on there looks and just enjoyed them moment.Then enjoyed it again untill eventually you realize after sex that they just do not do it for you physically?



No.

In response to:
If so then should I be brutally honest?



Omit being brutal, be kind and honest.

In response to:
Should I try to be diplomatic and blame my own issues?



Be kind and honest. Don't use whatever issues you have to deliver them to her and use them as an excuse for you not finding her intimately attractive.

In response to:
Should I just become uncontactable and eventually she will get the message?



Tell her, you want to cut contact. If she persists then block her or change your email address.

In response to:
Or should I be vague and say "its not you its me..."



It's an old, used line. Intelligent women do not buy that line.

In response to:

Have you ever dated someone more than you felt that you should have done before bringing an end to it and if so did you feel guilty?


Guilt?

Horrible thing to carry around on your shoulders, have done it...

Shelve the guilt, like heavy shopping bags...

Put it away, one by one, empty the bags and release yourelf...

I stayed with a person for longer than necessary because of feeling guilty.

It is not pretty or pleasant.


I like YOU but I you just do not do it for me physically...: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
mindfful: ya know what i dont regret a word of it

i leave you alone but when you insult me-as you did
i respond
in truth and shining light on whats true

i dont pretend well and im no syncophant

but trust me i meant this comment you just quoted and squirted your stinking disdain on as much as i meant the last one

i wish you were happier
i wish you were less fixated on this place
than to come in hours later and immediately search your last go at someone and start it up again

when i say niceties i never say them as sarcasm

i aint wonderful or perfect
but i am earnest always


As I said, enjoy your evening...

bouquet


Would you leave your love for your children?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
mindfful: ya know what i dont regret a word of it

i leave you alone but when you insult me-as you did
i respond
in truth and shining light on whats true

i dont pretend well and im no syncophant

but trust me i meant this comment you just quoted and squirted your stinking disdain on as much as i meant the last one

i wish you were happier
i wish you were less fixated on this place
than to come in hours later and immediately search your last go at someone and start it up again

when i say niceties i never say them as sarcasm

i aint wonderful or perfect
but i am earnest always


As I said, enjoy your evening...

bouquet


Would you leave your love for your children?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
mindfful: oh bugger off sommer
honestly

i am rarely here you are here hours every day

you are queen i am a mere annoyance like a mosquito
and i certainly dont send people mail about how ugly and old and wrinkled they are while calling them the c word and such now do i?

no that would be the king of cs
what a wondrous and benificent king indeed

reality shows have no stars and lets be real i'd be the first one voted off- and so what?

please save your condescension for others to whom it might not be so clear to and therefore more delicious and satisfying for you
ive no need of it i am at quota of that from you and yours
Mindful, you are so beautifully eloquent in your words...

Have a great evening, Sweetheart...


Would you leave your love for your children?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
HJFinAZ: I gain a daughter in my last relationship, she was 21 at the time and had never had a father. That relationship (with her mother) ended a little over 4 years ago and the kid still calls me and calls me "Papa"..


Beautiful, Pat.


Would you leave your love for your children?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
ContraryCol: Look.There is absolutely no hidden issues here for me.
What we both posted is there for anyone reading to digest if they wished too.
Unlike what you made clear earlier,we differ because im happy to believe that the reader will be able to make a reasoned opinion on my posts merits and shortcomings.
As for what you have written in your later post?
I will treat it with the contempt it deserves.

Simples.
Ah, the blessings of understandings and kindness.


Would you leave your love for your children?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
Actually dannatella, I do believe that you may be referring to our friend whoingeneva???

I could be wrong.

He may be a virgin, but at least one would not have to worry about STD'S, previous sexual conquests and a man who is out for all he can get.

Sie verstehen, wo ich aus?


WOULD ANY ONE DATE A 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN???: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
Ambrose2007: Hey, T! Yeah, I thought of this last night. I really can't imagine anyone preferring to be thought of a reproducing machine, nor accepting that this is his or her primary purpose in life.

I find it interesting that while some here have declared that children are the most important, they chose to skip over that and related telling questions. A more cynical person than I might suspect that perhaps they would be uncomfortable taking their position out to its logical culmination.
Fortunately, I'm not not that cynical, so I'm guessing it's merely lack of time or perhaps that they simply forgot my questions.


The things you think of...

And thank the blue skies that you do.

I was swimming this afternoon and was thinking about the other thread, so I can say I am damn pleased that you have started this one... It makes me think of Captain and how he would have loved a child, something I cannot give him, but I have some he can share and plough some love into which he does... As they do him, he started this daft blog for the kids to add to and they do and often they say 'he has not written on the blog, tell him to write some stuff for us' and he makes them feel important, loved, gives them attention, makes them laugh with his zany humour, he takes that time out, from me to give that to them.

I come back to Rodders profound post, because it is something that I believe in, that we show our children through our behaviours how we love, if we cannot love as adults, how the hell are they to have happy, fulfilled balanced relationships? If we just walk away? With the view that, 'another partner will be along, but you kids will always be here'

Then I think of my father, who gave me enough love for a mother as well as a father, he had to make a choice, he had to put his children first as they were neglected, which we were at that time.

But that was not because he was choosing his children over their mother, it was because he wanted to remove the burden so that she had a shot at becoming well so that she could be a mother.

And to me, that is what makes also a special man, he took his children to take care of them, so that their mother, his wife could have a chance at being a mum, I say that is pretty big love going on there... Even if she could not become that mother.


Is the primary purpose of couples to breed?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
You next.


In response to: On the "Would you leave your love for your children?" thread, I raised a question substantially different but nonetheless related to the OP's inquiry: Should one's romantic partner/spouse be one's highest value?

Though virtually everyone, with a few possible exceptions, replied to the above with a resounding "NO! Kids always come first!", my suspicion is that if their romantic partner had said to them: "Honey, I want to be with you so we can have babies!", most of these very same respondents would find that off-putting and perhaps even offensive. Surely most women would not like to be thought of by their spouse or lover as primarily a "baby-machine" (or vice versa)?

And yet I believe this is precisely the view that logically follows from the premise "kids are more important."

My view is somewhat different. I believe that romantic couples are the well-spring from which a family life flows. Their love for each other is, as the Ayn Rand-lover, Wonderworker, might put it, the "Fountainhead" of all relationships.

Can you imagine standing on the altar, and your beloved declares to you: "My dearest, I love you more than the Moon, the Sun, and most stars. However, when we have children, you will need to take second, or possibly even third or fourth place in my heart behind them." Would you reply: "Ah, baby, you say the sweetest things!"


Actually, when my son was born, my ex husband said he saw me in a different way. He was very involved with our son, at the tender age of 20, right from the word go. But to come back to his words, when my eldest was ten days old, I asked him how he was feeling and he said he loved me much more as a mother than he did as the single girl he had met.

He went on to say, that he found me fascinating when I was pregnant, the curves, (I was a skinny miss) the way I looked softer and that I was much nicer to him and made him feel more important to him, because I was carrying his child. Did I feel second place? No. My heart lurched with love, because then I knew that this was the right move for us, even though he was unplanned and it made me see my husband in a different light. Our son blended into our lives and my husband remained uppermost in that unit of the three of us...

Their needs were different, my son needed his mother and when that time was done, my husband needed his wife, when he was out working (do remember this is all prior to the spectacular end of our marriage) to provide for his wife and his child, our son did not move up in his love ranks, the whole unit became something that he knew he had to work for to keep us healthy, warm and a roof over our heads.

I gave him what ultimately made me forgive him, his children and in that, now 21 years later with his new partner and his new child, he has never forgotten that I gave him his hearts desire and that was his children and that in his mind makes me still, even though we are divorced and our daughter gets married next year, up there as a person that he loves very much indeed.


Is the primary purpose of couples to breed?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
This


rodolpho: How can you teach ur kids what true love is, if you love them more then ur partner?

My kids will recieve more protection but not more love.


Is spectacular!


Is the primary purpose of couples to breed?: click here to read the entire thread »




Sommerauer71 Salzburg, Salzburg Austria
Ambrose2007: On the "Would you leave your love for your children?" thread, I raised a question substantially different but nonetheless related to the OP's inquiry: Should one's romantic partner/spouse be one's highest value?

Though virtually everyone, with a few possible exceptions, replied to the above with a resounding "NO! Kids always come first!", my suspicion is that if their romantic partner had said to them: "Honey, I want to be with you so we can have babies!", most of these very same respondents would find that off-putting and perhaps even offensive. Surely most women would not like to be thought of by their spouse or lover as primarily a "baby-machine" (or vice versa)?

And yet I believe this is precisely the view that logically follows from the premise "kids are more important."

My view is somewhat different. I believe that romantic couples are the well-spring from which a family life flows. Their love for each other is, as the Ayn Rand-lover, Wonderworker, might put it, the "Fountainhead" of all relationships.

Can you imagine standing on the altar, and your beloved declares to you: "My dearest, I love you more than the Moon, the Sun, and most stars. However, when we have children, you will need to take second, or possibly even third or fourth place in my heart behind them." Would you reply: "Ah, baby, you say the sweetest things!"
This is a better way of looking at things Ambrose... I'll read this with interest.


Is the primary purpose of couples to breed?: click here to read the entire thread »







If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »