Posted: Mar 26, 2008, 7:20 AM CST
j_goose71 wrote:Actually by saying "God" you violate the litteral meaning of the first ammendment, gnome.
It is a Biblical God that you referred to, not a morse god, an egyptian god, or any other. List them all if you're going to list one.
And the Posting of the ten commandments, though it does not infringe on YOUR rights, it certainly would offend a budist, a taoist, or all those that worship NO god.
and I think it was Bev that made the best point. If the 10cs were displayed along side the Book of the Dead or the Eddas, as a historical collection, it would be a different thing all together.
I think you are REALLY stretching the intent of the costitution. I can't say 'God' without violating someone's rights? That amounts to 'Prior Restraint'- also unconstitutional.
I fail to see how the display of the 10 commandments can be offensive, if one READS the words. Would Shakespere's words be offensive, Ghandi's, Kennedy's, Darrow's?
Bear in mind this was not a display of the entire set of Mosaic law, just a fundamental stating of one of the foundations of western jurisprudence.
I find it amusing that this display excites such controversy, while the words on the facade of the Supreme Court don't seem to ellicit much comment.
Why does it offend someone with no beliefs to hear that others have beliefs?
My America: click here to read the entire thread »