This happened recently in Massachusetts. It could have and has happened all across America. Do you think this is a good way to control animal over population, owning large numbers of animals or any of the problems addressed by this story?
It seems to me that it is only a way for a town to make money from it's citizens without offering any service for that money? What do you think?
***************************
Nov. 03, 2009
Mass. Town Puts Limit Of 3 On Owning Cats Without A Special Kennel License
(AP) DUDLEY, Mass. (AP) - A Massachusetts town has made it illegal to own more than three cats without getting a special license.
Voters at a town meeting in Dudley added language to a town bylaw on Monday night that makes it illegal to own more than three cats without a $50 residential kennel license.
The article was in response to a neighborhood feud over the 15 cats owned by Mary Ellen Richards.
The Telegram & Gazette of Worcester reports that one neighbor claimed the cats have ruined his yard.
Richards has put her home up for sale and says she plans to move to a "more cat-friendly community."
Dudley is about 60 miles southwest of Boston.
___
Information from: Telegram & Gazette,
http://www.telegram.com