Posted: Jan 15, 2007, 11:13 AM CST
In response to:
For some dog (or for pets in general) lovers the passion really comes through sometimes, and kinda give me goose bumps. My interest has been (see comment about ex-girlfriend‘s pack order) that some women are replacing men with dogs.
Concerning the terms unconditional love and loyalty, does that mean that men, at least as far as some people (and I include perceptive men in this comment) believe that men are not trustworthy or capable of loving? Are we really jerks of that caliber? Is there no room near the top of the pack for us?
Some are certainly jerks of that caliber. I've met a lot who are, in fact. I don't think humans have the capacity for true unconditional love. Even animals do love ...on the "condition" that they are fed, watered and loved in return. An abused animal is not going to be very loving, you know?
I'm sure that there are guys out there who are trustworthy and loyal and capable of loving; I've just not met any yet with whom I've had a personal involvement. Maybe they were capable of it with someone else, or maybe eventually they were, but my experience with them was anything but. And I'm not stating that they were necessarily "bad" men; if anything it was the indifference toward my feelings, my point of view, my value as a woman and as a human being that I took issue with.
I just have a huge problem playing out my "blueprinted gender role" as the "weaker or fairer sex." I want to be looked upon completely as an equal, as a human being, and not as someone to pamper, display, chase, spoil, or, in other words, be treated as though I'm a child.
My .02, anyway. Subject for a different thread, however.