Thread:

UFO's

Category:
CS Lounge (misc.)
page: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> of 23

UFO's




b_n_d
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:08 PM CST
In response to:
I don't believe in the face things either, I have sure seen a lot of scarey faces and figures in wood designs , anyone can with a little imagination. So I don't believe in the faces in rock formation.
The thing is, this is no natural formation. Either get the three part series and learn. or leave it alone. I was skeptical till I saw it. NASA freaked over the presentation. It's not just about the face, it's the alignment of the pyramids. WIf you missed earlier in this post, there is an exact duplicate of Cydonia, in England.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:09 PM CST
In response to:
That correct, Now there are some different shots from rover, that clearly depict a ruin.more like a huge delapidated building made of huge bricks. the shot is on the net, it's good quality. Rover sent back alot of new stuff that was gone over very well. They even have shot showing water on the south pole.
Oh !

I haven't seen those , what Link ?
Hook a Brutha up
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



FunGuyWithBrain
North Liberty, Iowa USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:10 PM CST
In response to:
shallow minded, You won't educate yourself only push opinion. When you watch the other video, and learn about all we know, then I'll watch yours, Fair enough?
You call me shallow minded? lol. Again, you are the one pushing your opinion and if someone disagrees with you, you get all defensive. You want to believe in little green men and if someone rattles your idea, you just get loud about it to hide the fact that you have no real evidence. That works with the science illiterate people of which there are many out there, but not with me. How hypocritical does one have to be to tell who is closed minded unless he/she believes in the same fairy tales and at the same time does not accept a real scientific article.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri dating
mylifewithu
springfield, Missouri USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:14 PM CST
In response to:
The thing is, this is no natural formation. Either get the three part series and learn. or leave it alone. I was skeptical till I saw it. NASA freaked over the presentation. It's not just about the face, it's the alignment of the pyramids. WIf you missed earlier in this post, there is an exact duplicate of Cydonia, in England.
So put up the link , I would like to see this, ok .
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



b_n_d
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:17 PM CST
In response to:
You call me shallow minded? lol. Again, you are the one pushing your opinion and if someone disagrees with you, you get all defensive. You want to believe in little green men and if someone rattles your idea, you just get loud about it to hide the fact that you have no real evidence. That works with the science illiterate people of which there are many out there, but not with me. How hypocritical does one have to be to tell who is closed minded unless he/she believes in the same fairy tales and at the same time does not accept a real scientific article.
I'm not pushing anything, Most that have posted on this thread have seen UFO's So will never sway us.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



KnittinKitten
Lady Lake, Florida USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:19 PM CST
Fun?guy....If you're not happy in this thread, why don't you take your feelings and your information over onto a thread of your own. Post a blog...don't allow any comments. There's more to life than "getting back" at people who do not agree with you!.

I have no opinion as to your thoughts because I am not familiar with this matter to such a depth. But, I can tell you that I am sure there would have been a better, more polite and respectful way of making your statements and reply to people. I doubt that they resent your knowledge, but perhaps you should examine how they are reacting to your language and your attitude?

Those who are truly knowledgeable do not fear challenge and they are usually quite capable of replying with confidence and respect.
Personally, you have taken away much of the enjoyment I was experiencing in this thread, just commenting, speculating, asking questions. It's o.k. to be smart...to be knowledgeable....but please try not to cram it down our throats. We may not be all that hungry for all your knowledge.

Now, to get back to UFO.s....my interest started with reading about Barney and Betty. And reading about the man who actually went out into the field where an UFO supposedly landed, taking his son along with him...and, confiscating a piece of the material without the knowledge of the "powers that be".

It will all come out...I really feel that it will.

Now, let's get back in the sandbox and all play nicely...

SINCERELY,

JUDY





Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:19 PM CST
Yeah !

I've seen not one , but many, so many I can't count them all.
Anyone who doesn't believe only needs to watch the might sky, and in some cases they appear in broad daylight, but I didn't work day shift .



grin
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:20 PM CST
Now Judy !

By the Howdy Hunny, were debating , this is what guys do were ok really .


devil
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:21 PM CST
Statistically? Statistically, Funguy, there are so many possibilities that you're into infinite monkey range. However, realistically, there are a lot of variables that cannot be fulfilled. The number of possible planets in the universe as it is known today still stands in the bilions. The probability that there is no life on any of them except this one can't actually be a number because of unknown parameters. But statistically, out of all those planets, it would be more of a fluke if we were alone than not.

I haven't scanned through all 10 pages of this thread, but BND... I'm going to have to pick a bone with you.

Of COURSE UFOs exist. The question isn't do they exist, but what are they. A UFO is an unidentified flying object. Anything that flashed past you in the air you didn't recognize is a UFO until you identify it. (All I'm really picking at here is the terminology.) If you're walking in the park and something buzzes past your head and you jerk, going "What the hell was that?!?" Well, it was a UFO. Might have been a bee. Might have been a Frisbee. lol.

UFOs fall into a lot of different classes. UFOs that appear to be possibly natural phenomena, UFOs that question intelligent control (which might include but not be limited to top-secret military projects), or UFSs that question extraterrestrial origin.


Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



b_n_d
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:22 PM CST
In response to:
Oh !

I haven't seen those , what Link ?
Hook a Brutha up
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicmarsanoms.htm

I'm still looking for the ruins shot. I wasn't going to post any links it's against the rules, but since it's been twice oh well. if the thread dies from we learn
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



b_n_d
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:25 PM CST
In response to:
Statistically? Statistically, Funguy, there are so many possibilities that you're into infinite monkey range. However, realistically, there are a lot of variables that cannot be fulfilled. The number of possible planets in the universe as it is known today still stands in the bilions. The probability that there is no life on any of them except this one can't actually be a number because of unknown parameters. But statistically, out of all those planets, it would be more of a fluke if we were alone than not.

I haven't scanned through all 10 pages of this thread, but BND... I'm going to have to pick a bone with you.

Of COURSE UFOs exist. The question isn't do they exist, but what are they. A UFO is an unidentified flying object. Anything that flashed past you in the air you didn't recognize is a UFO until you identify it. (All I'm really picking at here is the terminology.) If you're walking in the park and something buzzes past your head and you jerk, going "What the hell was that?!?" Well, it was a UFO. Might have been a bee. Might have been a Frisbee. lol.

UFOs fall into a lot of different classes. UFOs that appear to be possibly natural phenomena, UFOs that question intelligent control (which might include but not be limited to top-secret military projects), or UFSs that question extraterrestrial origin.


Welcome night owl point well taken basically this started out as athread for those that have seen the unexplained. That wouldn't have been a catchy title
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Icekrystal24
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:26 PM CST
In response to:
Statistically? Statistically, Funguy, there are so many possibilities that you're into infinite monkey range. However, realistically, there are a lot of variables that cannot be fulfilled. The number of possible planets in the universe as it is known today still stands in the bilions. The probability that there is no life on any of them except this one can't actually be a number because of unknown parameters. But statistically, out of all those planets, it would be more of a fluke if we were alone than not.

I haven't scanned through all 10 pages of this thread, but BND... I'm going to have to pick a bone with you.

Of COURSE UFOs exist. The question isn't do they exist, but what are they. A UFO is an unidentified flying object. Anything that flashed past you in the air you didn't recognize is a UFO until you identify it. (All I'm really picking at here is the terminology.) If you're walking in the park and something buzzes past your head and you jerk, going "What the hell was that?!?" Well, it was a UFO. Might have been a bee. Might have been a Frisbee. lol.

UFOs fall into a lot of different classes. UFOs that appear to be possibly natural phenomena, UFOs that question intelligent control (which might include but not be limited to top-secret military projects), or UFSs that question extraterrestrial origin.


very well said.......just leave my mans bones alone.............rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



b_n_d
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:27 PM CST
In response to:
Yeah !

I've seen not one , but many, so many I can't count them all.
Anyone who doesn't believe only needs to watch the might sky, and in some cases they appear in broad daylight, but I didn't work day shift .



Well when most people are buried inside at work school whatever. they don't gwet the opportunity like you and I had. Plus if you are in the city, the sky is so poluuted, the visibility is poor.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:27 PM CST
In response to:
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicmarsanoms.htm

I'm still looking for the ruins shot. I wasn't going to post any links it's against the rules, but since it's been twice oh well. if the thread dies from we learn
Thanks Buddy looking now
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



b_n_d
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:28 PM CST
In response to:
Fun?guy....If you're not happy in this thread, why don't you take your feelings and your information over onto a thread of your own. Post a blog...don't allow any comments. There's more to life than "getting back" at people who do not agree with you!.

I have no opinion as to your thoughts because I am not familiar with this matter to such a depth. But, I can tell you that I am sure there would have been a better, more polite and respectful way of making your statements and reply to people. I doubt that they resent your knowledge, but perhaps you should examine how they are reacting to your language and your attitude?

Those who are truly knowledgeable do not fear challenge and they are usually quite capable of replying with confidence and respect.
Personally, you have taken away much of the enjoyment I was experiencing in this thread, just commenting, speculating, asking questions. It's o.k. to be smart...to be knowledgeable....but please try not to cram it down our throats. We may not be all that hungry for all your knowledge.

Now, to get back to UFO.s....my interest started with reading about Barney and Betty. And reading about the man who actually went out into the field where an UFO supposedly landed, taking his son along with him...and, confiscating a piece of the material without the knowledge of the "powers that be".

It will all come out...I really feel that it will.

Now, let's get back in the sandbox and all play nicely...

SINCERELY,

JUDY





Judy your words are always a pleasure to read.wave
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:28 PM CST
In response to:
I'm not talking about tweaking. I'm talking about serious math. You need to take the parameters in consideration that matter. Sometimes, of course, you cannot make a sophisticated estimate for a variable. Then the whole thing becomes fuzzy and meaningless. This one is straightforward though.
Are you referring to the Drake equation? That changes by the day as life (as we know it) is redefined...and, going back to one of your earlier posts about rational explanations that we are still to stupid to understand...why does it have to be "life as we know it"? That is sheer narrow-minded arrogance...
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Algarion
Patras, Peloponessos Greece
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:29 PM CST
So we post threads to have fun or to persue truth?
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Icekrystal24
Glasgow, Kentucky USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:30 PM CST
In response to:
Are you referring to the Drake equation? That changes by the day as life (as we know it) is redefined...and, going back to one of your earlier posts about rational explanations that we are still to stupid to understand...why does it have to be "life as we know it"? That is sheer narrow-minded arrogance...
Bravo!!!!!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



FunGuyWithBrain
North Liberty, Iowa USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:31 PM CST
In response to:
Fun?guy....If you're not happy in this thread, why don't you take your feelings and your information over onto a thread of your own. Post a blog...don't allow any comments. There's more to life than "getting back" at people who do not agree with you!.

I have no opinion as to your thoughts because I am not familiar with this matter to such a depth. But, I can tell you that I am sure there would have been a better, more polite and respectful way of making your statements and reply to people. I doubt that they resent your knowledge, but perhaps you should examine how they are reacting to your language and your attitude?

Those who are truly knowledgeable do not fear challenge and they are usually quite capable of replying with confidence and respect.
Personally, you have taken away much of the enjoyment I was experiencing in this thread, just commenting, speculating, asking questions. It's o.k. to be smart...to be knowledgeable....but please try not to cram it down our throats. We may not be all that hungry for all your knowledge.

Now, to get back to UFO.s....my interest started with reading about Barney and Betty. And reading about the man who actually went out into the field where an UFO supposedly landed, taking his son along with him...and, confiscating a piece of the material without the knowledge of the "powers that be".

It will all come out...I really feel that it will.

Now, let's get back in the sandbox and all play nicely...

SINCERELY,

JUDY





With all due respect. I'm not getting back at anyone, I'm not cramming anything down someone's throat, nor have I used any insulting language. The problem is, if I don't speak up on the same level, you can't be heard in a crowd like this.

This is not just about making someone believe in the same thing. This is about removing charlatanry and hoaxes from the public belief because it is hurting society as a whole. It's not just about UFO's or aliens or angels, or whatever. It's about a principle. People making unqualified statements and claims that have no scientific reasoning, yet are selling them as rational and scientific. All of this is just pseudoscience and hurts the public understanding of real science and progress in important fields as well as the education of future generations.

This may sound like an exaggeration but there are many pieces to a puzzle. This is just one of them but it needs attention nonetheless. Nobody with respectable knowledge of science should stand by and just accept crazy ideas, whether they are posted in "Nature", your local newspaper or on a dating web site.

If you feel that I was too harsh, then I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. There was nothing rude about it. Sometimes a debate gets heated and the intensities go up, but there has not been any name calling on either side.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



dawn777
akron, Ohio USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:33 PM CST
In response to:
So we post threads to have fun or to persue truth?
I think bothwine
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> of 23

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »