Thread:

UFO's

Category:
CS Lounge (misc.)
page: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> of 23

UFO's

Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:33 PM CST
Hmm... How about titling it "You saw WHAT?!?!"

lol
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:33 PM CST
Judy theres Testosterone flying everywhere in here, be careful you may get some on you Princess.






grin
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:35 PM CST
In response to:
With all due respect. I'm not getting back at anyone, I'm not cramming anything down someone's throat, nor have I used any insulting language. The problem is, if I don't speak up on the same level, you can't be heard in a crowd like this.

This is not just about making someone believe in the same thing. This is about removing charlatanry and hoaxes from the public belief because it is hurting society as a whole. It's not just about UFO's or aliens or angels, or whatever. It's about a principle. People making unqualified statements and claims that have no scientific reasoning, yet are selling them as rational and scientific. All of this is just pseudoscience and hurts the public understanding of real science and progress in important fields as well as the education of future generations.

This may sound like an exaggeration but there are many pieces to a puzzle. This is just one of them but it needs attention nonetheless. Nobody with respectable knowledge of science should stand by and just accept crazy ideas, whether they are posted in "Nature", your local newspaper or on a dating web site.

If you feel that I was too harsh, then I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. There was nothing rude about it. Sometimes a debate gets heated and the intensities go up, but there has not been any name calling on either side.
We've had our battles, but I still respect your opinion, my friend...I always end up learning something, although, it might not be exactly what either of us thought it might be, and that's what this is supposed to be all about, eh?

Keep on keepin on, FG...thumbs up
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Algarion
Patras Greece
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:35 PM CST
In response to:
With all due respect. I'm not getting back at anyone, I'm not cramming anything down someone's throat, nor have I used any insulting language. The problem is, if I don't speak up on the same level, you can't be heard in a crowd like this.

This is not just about making someone believe in the same thing. This is about removing charlatanry and hoaxes from the public belief because it is hurting society as a whole. It's not just about UFO's or aliens or angels, or whatever. It's about a principle. People making unqualified statements and claims that have no scientific reasoning, yet are selling them as rational and scientific. All of this is just pseudoscience and hurts the public understanding of real science and progress in important fields as well as the education of future generations.

This may sound like an exaggeration but there are many pieces to a puzzle. This is just one of them but it needs attention nonetheless. Nobody with respectable knowledge of science should stand by and just accept crazy ideas, whether they are posted in "Nature", your local newspaper or on a dating web site.

If you feel that I was too harsh, then I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. There was nothing rude about it. Sometimes a debate gets heated and the intensities go up, but there has not been any name calling on either side.
This is the key concept one must always keep in mind!!!

Bravo FunGuy!!!thumbs up
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:35 PM CST
In response to:
Are you referring to the Drake equation? That changes by the day as life (as we know it) is redefined...and, going back to one of your earlier posts about rational explanations that we are still to stupid to understand...why does it have to be "life as we know it"? That is sheer narrow-minded arrogance...
GB good point, I forgot about the drake Equation.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Icekrystal24
Glasgow USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:36 PM CST
The fact of the matter is, science will always try to reason away the unexplained. And when they can't, they will ignor it's importance......until it can no longer be ignored. Thus has been the way of science for as long as science has been........

Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



FunGuyWithBrain
North Liberty, Iowa USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:37 PM CST
In response to:
Statistically? Statistically, Funguy, there are so many possibilities that you're into infinite monkey range. However, realistically, there are a lot of variables that cannot be fulfilled. The number of possible planets in the universe as it is known today still stands in the bilions. The probability that there is no life on any of them except this one can't actually be a number because of unknown parameters. But statistically, out of all those planets, it would be more of a fluke if we were alone than not.

I haven't scanned through all 10 pages of this thread, but BND... I'm going to have to pick a bone with you.

Of COURSE UFOs exist. The question isn't do they exist, but what are they. A UFO is an unidentified flying object. Anything that flashed past you in the air you didn't recognize is a UFO until you identify it. (All I'm really picking at here is the terminology.) If you're walking in the park and something buzzes past your head and you jerk, going "What the hell was that?!?" Well, it was a UFO. Might have been a bee. Might have been a Frisbee. lol.

UFOs fall into a lot of different classes. UFOs that appear to be possibly natural phenomena, UFOs that question intelligent control (which might include but not be limited to top-secret military projects), or UFSs that question extraterrestrial origin.


Actually, with today's knowledge you can make some good guesses about how many planets could be out there. However, even if you assume a great range of variability and overestimate the actual numbers, the odds are very poor to say the least. I am talking about intelligent life that could travel far distances within the universe. This is virtually impossible.

I agree with your definition on UFOs. I mentioned earlier that people may have seen UFOs based on that definition. The claim was though that these particular UFOs were occupied by aliens and that pyramids were built on mars, etc. That's just not true.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



FunGuyWithBrain
North Liberty, Iowa USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:38 PM CST
Thanks Galactic and Al. That's true, we do learn from discussions.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



FunGuyWithBrain
North Liberty, Iowa USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:39 PM CST
In response to:
The fact of the matter is, science will always try to reason away the unexplained. And when they can't, they will ignor it's importance......until it can no longer be ignored. Thus has been the way of science for as long as science has been........

"Reason away"? Are you saying that explaning something by reasoning is a bad thing?
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri personals
mylifewithu
Springfield, Missouri USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:41 PM CST
I got a question for all of you smart men , How big is space and what is outside of that, and outside of that and on and on.rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Algarion
Patras Greece
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:41 PM CST
In response to:
The fact of the matter is, science will always try to reason away the unexplained. And when they can't, they will ignor it's importance......until it can no longer be ignored. Thus has been the way of science for as long as science has been........

Yes of course! That's because science examines things that can be subjected to experiment. The experiment is the sole judge of truth.
wine
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:43 PM CST
In response to:
Yes of course! That's because science examines things that can be subjected to experiment. The experiment is the sole judge of truth.
Thus, science is experiential, and experience is a great part of it...that is fundamentally the issue here...someone who has experienced a close encounter has a different perspective than someone who hasn't...

If you've never taken LSD, no amount of explanation will ever be able to convey what its like...

If you have, no explanation is necessary...

Bad analogy, maybe...but I came up with it on the fly...rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



KnittinKitten
Lady Lake USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:43 PM CST
Thanks for the "Heads Up, Charlie"....it won't be the first time.

I don't have any problem at all with heated debates...but, sometimes it gets to a point way above the heads of many of the others, effectively knocking them out of the "debate".

I have just read FunGuys reply...it was polite and respectful and, because he explained it in language I can understand, I can at least see where he's coming from.

If I wasn't on slow land line, I'd give anything to see some of the videos mentioned, but it takes forever for me to even download something, I wouldn't even attempt an hour-long video.

I'm hanging on to this thread with all the energy I have as it is....it's way past supper time. Don't say anything too exciting til I get back.....

Love ya all..... I'm o.k. ...and THANKS for caring!

Judy
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



FunGuyWithBrain
North Liberty, Iowa USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:44 PM CST
In response to:
Are you referring to the Drake equation? That changes by the day as life (as we know it) is redefined...and, going back to one of your earlier posts about rational explanations that we are still to stupid to understand...why does it have to be "life as we know it"? That is sheer narrow-minded arrogance...
I'm not talking at all about the Drake equation. That's a bunch of nonsense too. The variables used there are random and cannot be estimated properly. I'm not talking about "calculating" how many life forms could be out there. I'm just talking about yes/no, a much simpler question. I also want to note that I included "intelligent" life and being able to travel across time and space which would be necessary to show up on this planet. That clearly shifts the odds even more dramatically. I would not try make a guess if there could be simple cell type life forms based on silicon for example (or whatever) in different physical environment. The claim was for the life forms to be able to come here and do stuff.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



b_n_d
Glasgow USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:45 PM CST
Charlie, I sent you the link in your E-mail, Which is what everyone should be doing, It's not the shot I'm looking for but I'll find it.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



dawn777
akron, Ohio USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:46 PM CST
In response to:
I got a question for all of you smart men , How big is space and what is outside of that, and outside of that and on and on.
rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:46 PM CST
funguy I agree with a some of what you say.
And I understand where you are coming from.
There is a saying we use a lot in cop work, " if it looks like a duck, walks , like a duck, must be a duck"
It isn't scientifically tested, but it explains a lot.
Sometimes, all we have are our personal Experiences

to help explain what is going on under our very noses.
Don't get me wrong, I love science, but it doesn't explain everything that goes on.
At least not yet, for example, the prehistoric Coelacanth, thought to have been long gone.
==========================
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://home.hetnet.nl/~genesis/deel1/Images/coelacanth.jpg&imgrefurl=http://home.hetnet.nl/~genesis/deel1/Geo68.htm&h=500&w=365&sz=74&hl=en&start=2&sig2=7Lh-ysW-DoK03Fxs9fKVgQ&tbnid=uyf01zk0e_gOPM:&tbnh=130&tbnw=95&ei=1Q21RrvdFZTYgAPc8s3ABA&prev=/images%3Fq%3DCoelacanth%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
===============================

This could be one of those instances, it Most likely exists, but just hasn't been scientifically proven as of yet ?
Or?
It has been proven, and someone isn't sharing with the rest of us which tends to be more Believable
in a lot of cases.





Chaz
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri personals
mylifewithu
Springfield, Missouri USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:47 PM CST
In response to:
Lets see them tell us that one, Dawn , Ha!!rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:47 PM CST
In response to:
Charlie, I sent you the link in your E-mail, Which is what everyone should be doing, It's not the shot I'm looking for but I'll find it.
Rgr Im diggen on it now My Brutha, Gawd this is cool stuff.


Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Roguecop
Elko, Nevada USA
Posted: Aug 4, 2007, 6:49 PM CST
In response to:
Thanks for the "Heads Up, Charlie"....it won't be the first time.

I don't have any problem at all with heated debates...but, sometimes it gets to a point way above the heads of many of the others, effectively knocking them out of the "debate".

I have just read FunGuys reply...it was polite and respectful and, because he explained it in language I can understand, I can at least see where he's coming from.

If I wasn't on slow land line, I'd give anything to see some of the videos mentioned, but it takes forever for me to even download something, I wouldn't even attempt an hour-long video.

I'm hanging on to this thread with all the energy I have as it is....it's way past supper time. Don't say anything too exciting til I get back.....

Love ya all..... I'm o.k. ...and THANKS for caring!

Judy
Judy your wearing such a Nice Blouse, I would hate to see anything get slopped on it my dear :)




devil grin
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> of 23

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »