Connecting Singles^® Forums100% Free Online Dating

I can just about 100 percent guarantee that no one in this thread "wants" war. We just see it at this point as the logical option at this time. Diplomacy doesn`t work with people who want to kill you.
They will tell you anything you want to hear, and then do what they planned from the beginning.
Seeing that a war is imminent, wouldn`t it be prudent to fight your enemy when he is still less than full strength?

Well said

If you mean by fighting an enemy by bombing him intot he stone age, yes yuo are more than capable, if you mean invading iran........you really need to do do your maths, you are already overstretched in iraq, by invading iran you'll unite all muslim countries and will be denied any arab land from which to launch a ground attack from. You'll really have the whole population against you, plus all the economic worries of petrol prices spiraling out of control so fast you will not believe and all the problems associated with that world wide.
When you people talk of war you really have no idea of the consequences

In reply,no one wants a war.Nobody wants to have to kill another,but to save oneself or others.If it becomes the sensibliest thing to do to go in Iran we should.But you have to look at the pros and cons of any given situation first,before jumping in with feet first.

I am well aware of the consequences. I know economies will suffer, I know that China and Russia are watching very closely. I know that the disruption of the flow of crude oil will have huge effects. But what happens if nothing is done about Iran, and 5 or 10 years down the road, they have nukes?

Then we still have the same concerns economically, and politically, but we also have a new problem. A psychotic with a bomb. I don`t want to see that scenario play out.

Um excuse me, I do know the consequences of war, you should not make such all inclusive statements if you dont have all your facts, I was in the Army for a long time (nearly 10 years) and I have been to war, and I have seen friends die, so dont tell me I dont know the consequences!

our motto in the USA ,get er done.

Let's just bomb the shit outta them for good, not leave one trace of an Iranian citizen, raze the whole country... Do you think any other country will mess with us again? I think not.

I think all the leaders should get together and drink beer.

Exactly!

I think Howard Stern said something like this shortly after 9/11, of course he proceeded to say that we should our prisoners over there, (meaning the violent criminals who have life sentences) that would be interesting.

They already do that too much, that's why the world is so messed up.

Been there. done that......I'm entitled to speak about it

spoken like a real man.......this thread ain't worth replying to anymore.........good luck with your new world order guys

I too hope your sister stays safe, but if America kept it's nose out of other peoples business and it's troops out of other peoples countries perhaps there would not have been a 9/11 , many thousands of people would still be alive and your sister would still be at home

Well, been there too and done quite a bit of that myself, but at least you should know what you're talking about. Why did you go to war yourself? Was there another choice? Did you go to your enemy and have tea and shoot the breeze with him? No, you kicked ass and that's probably why you're still alive. So now sit back, relax and what the big boys do it,

I never said you werent entitled to speak of it....all I said is get your facts straight first!

Your facts or mine? We all agree to disagree...........this is as far as I'm willing to speak here...........it's for nothing

The role of the United Nations.

The most important role for the United Nations con-
sists of its efforts to work on the most dangerous conflicts
among and within States that provide the key motivations for
acquiring weapons, including weapons of mass destruction.
The United Nations must enhance these efforts to combat this
danger at the source. In this context, the Organization should
continue to support and encourage efforts at the regional level
to cope with the threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction, including to non-state actors, e.g., the proposed
Zone Free of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Middle
East, supported by all countries in the region.
Among the instruments of the international commu-
nity to combat the dangers of the spread of weapons and of
international terrorism, the first priority is to strengthen inter-
national treaties and other arrangements that serve these
objectives. To this end, the capabilities of the United Nations,
and the Security Council in particular, to uphold these treaties
must be further enhanced, notably the capacity to respond in
cases of grave non-compliance that could pose a threat to
peace and international security.

I have to say they have been a dismal failure.