In response to:
It is a sad fact of human history that religion has been a major source of conflict ... If interested persons direct their attention to the New Testament (the Old Testament is the history of the Jews, then God threw up his hands in disgust at the goings-on and sent Jesus to enlighten us)..... The Old Testament also teaches you how far from your tent to dig your crap-hole, where and how to bury your dead, and how to recognise contagious diseases. Other than that it is more a philosophical discussion.
The New Testament of the Bible, in common with most other books of religious instruction, irrespective of their authors,is to teach us morality, ethical restraint and discipline, the cultivation of virtue, social responsibility, and compassion, social and political justice, care of the natural environment and many other matters affecting all humanity.
Ultimately the important point to keep in mind is that the whole purpose of religion is to facilitate all the above mentioned attributes.
When we fail to implement these qualities in our daily lives, irrespective of which religion we follow, we are no better off than a patient with a fatal illness who reads a medical treatise but fails to undertake the treatment prescribed.
To quote from the Dalai Lama Tenzin Gyatso: Ancient Wisdom Modern World....
"May I become at all times, both now and forever
A protector for those without protection
A guide for those who have lost their way
A ship for those with oceans to cross
A bridge for those with rivers to cross
A sanctuary for those in danger
A lamp for those in need of light
A place of refuge for those in need of shelter
And a servant to all those in need."
I cant disagree with your assertions and so well constructed too. especially this line-
"When we fail to implement these qualities in our daily lives, irrespective of which religion we follow, we are no better off than a patient with a fatal illness who reads a medical treatise but fails to undertake the treatment prescribed."
I dont feel I have ever questioned the essence or the sentiment of the bible, have spoken up before that that is indeed the part we ought to hear. It is not however the word of god, unless you belive god is man, I can go with that, but then I wonder why such outrageous things continue today in proof of JC and arcs and .. well the list goes on ..people trying to prove the implausable, the unbelievable, when the essence itself is great belief.
However in respect of the paragraph noted, I wonder if the prescription comes from someone who right about its need? Many a man has been mistakenly prescribed...
good input smoky!
wow I wish I could write like her..