Connecting Singles^® Forums100% Free Online Dating

All life may not be energy...BUT all life needs energy to constitute a living being!!!!!!!

But the leg is missing? How can any trace of that leg still be apparent to these energy/force measuring instruments then?

I can give you a method to see your own aura, it would take too long to teach here and now but it is there ... factually.

the limb shows as an energy sig of that limb, not a replica of it but an energy field.

electricity speding thru a wire is energy , alive and well .. does not constitute a living being .. but perhaps being alive ..

another 'seeming' freakin paradox

Thanks Al.

I'm kinda aware of this 'energy' field that surrounds us...our aura if you like, but is it actual energy?

NO, NO, NO, NO. I don't accept the assertion 'all life is energy'.

You will have to amend it. It is incorrect.

All life HAS energy/depletes the energy it has [necessary to remain in motion (alive)]/needs energy.

IS energy? Just energy? As in: ‘all life is energy’ as asserted.

Uh-uh. No way.

It would be very nice if it was that simple. Everything alive is energy. No, it’s also mass. And even that mass once dead is energy and still mass. The mass is consumed and so is its energy.

And the depleted energy is always in equal proportion to the depleted mass.

then isnt this similar to the god concept stuff?

it is the same feild that one can feel around any energy source but for clarifacation, you can get it from touching the metal screw that holds your electric switch plate on the wall ... we call it a shock .. you can also come very close to touching a motor's energy feild and feel its energy. that felid is visible ... just ask tesla ... or edgar case and many others.

Please note I am not advocating we all run out and touch electrical appliances!!!

Yes it is indeed limited!

The relative mass and energy remains with the served limb!!!

Absolutely!!!

INDEED!!!

Ok I gotcha so far as what you noted above ... youre saying without mass there is no energy possible ....hmmmmmm

does that not prove what i am saying ... without mass =no energy(you say) . therefor no life... extrapolation no life = no energy ..


doesnt that prove tht life is energy.?

No its not Trish, you just can't say 'all life is energy'

Well all this talk about life and ebergy I can't help but to think that we are all energy after all; life as we know now, but an energy form after all

no it does not Ray ... the energy signature stays with the frog ,.. not the limb .. sorry but that has factual evidence.

mass does not need energy to be mass

cant you put all of your experiences down to a 'tingle' then

the ray .. please illustrate a life that is not energy.

not possible; the opposite is however possible; electricity

also chemical reactions and the energy they produce

already established electricity is alive