Posted: Jan 12, 2008, 6:11 AM CST
What's fascinating about this discussion is how it follows traditional lines within this sort of debate.
The religious element defending the foundation for their beliefs against ropey subversion from the scientific community...as well as mockery and sarcasm.
And the scientific community themselves...lofty...the epitome of hubris...total confidence in the ultimate truth of the basis for their beliefs.
Reality check needed folks.
Science cannot answer everything...and indeed, in seeking to answer questions scientifically, science has to be 'creative'...it has to 'theorize'...quite frequently actually. Consider Quantum Mechanics for a start. Remarkable minds...and creative thinkers seeking to explain what is around us. WORK IN PROGRESS!!
Now, as this is the case, how different is belief in one from the other?
Both are still attemtpting to prove themselves as fact. Both have very few answers, but claim to have them ALL!!!
Both camps are at times, victims of their own narrow-mindedness. The scientists hubristic approach to his growing understanding of the world around him, seems like a man with a £20 note who is convinced he can now buy a brand new Porsche.
And the religionist who picks and chooses what suits them...and doesn't really care from whence it materialized.
Oh dear...it is fun!
Basically, the scientist and the religionist both have faith. One hopes that it can all be explained, and one that it will be explained.
You can decide for yourself who's who on that one...I'll not attempt to make up your mind.