Thread:

How Americans view News Stations in the US. (courtesy of Reuters)

Category:
CS Lounge (misc.)

How Americans view News Stations in the US. (courtesy of Reuters)

Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jan 10, 2008, 5:51 PM CST
At least this should be less controversial than some of the political threads ~~~


Americans see:

-- Growing media attempts to influence public opinion and policies

-- Poor quality

-- A strong liberal bent in most media

-- Fox News, CNN and NBC as the most accurate

A Sacred Heart University Poll found significantly declining percentages of Americans saying they
believe all or most of media news reporting. In the current national poll,
just 19.6% of those surveyed could say they believe all or most news media
reporting. This is down from 27.4% in 2003. Just under one-quarter, 23.9%, in
2007 said they believe little or none of reporting while 55.3% suggested they
believe some media news reporting.

"The fact that an astonishing percentage of Americans see biases and
partisanship in their mainstream news sources suggests an active and critical
consumer of information in the U.S.," stated James Castonguay, Ph.D.,
associate professor and chair of SHU's Department of Media Studies & Digital
Culture. "The availability of alternative viewpoints and news sources through
the Internet no doubt contributes to the increased skepticism about the
objectivity of profit-driven news outlets owned by large conglomerates," he
continued.

The perception is growing among Americans that the news media attempts to
influence public opinion -- from 79.3% strongly or somewhat agreeing in 2003
to 87.6% in 2007.

And, 86.0% agreed (strongly or somewhat) that the news media attempts to
influence public policies -- up from 76.7% in 2003.

Americans surveyed provided poor ratings for the national news media on six
different characteristics measured. The average overall positive rating across
all six characteristics measured was 33.4%. The highest positive rating,
40.7%, was recorded for quality of reporting followed by accuracy of reporting
at 36.9% and keeping any personal bias out of stories (33.3%).

Other low positive ratings included: fairness (31.3%), presenting an even
balance of views (30.4%) and presenting negative and positive news equally
(27.5%).

"Americans know bias and imbalance when they see it and they don't like it.
When most service organizations strive for consumer satisfaction ratings in
the high eighties to low nineties, an overall positive rating of 40.7% is
dismal," said Jerry C. Lindsley, director of the Sacred Heart University
Polling Institute. He added, "Americans know that it's just not that hard to
present both sides and keep personal bias at home."

By four-to-one margins, Americans surveyed see The New York Times (41.9% to
11.8%) and National Public Radio (40.3% to 11.2%) as mostly or somewhat
liberal over mostly or somewhat conservative.

By a three-to-one margin, Americans see news media journalists and
broadcasters (45.4% to 15.7%) as mostly or somewhat liberal over mostly or
somewhat conservative.

And, by a two-to-one margin, Americans see CNN (44.9% to 18.4%) and MSNBC
(38.8% to 15.8%) as mostly or somewhat liberal over mostly or somewhat
conservative.

Just Fox News was seen as mostly and somewhat conservative (48.7%) over mostly
or somewhat liberal (22.3%).

The most trusted national TV news organizations, for accurate reporting, in
declining order included: Fox News (27.0%), CNN (14.6%), and NBC News
(10.90%). These were followed by ABC News (7.0%), local news (6.9%), CBS News
(6.8%) MSNBC (4.0%), PBS News (3.0%), CNBC (0.6%) and CBN (0.5%).

In 2003, CNN led Fox News on "trust most for accurate reporting" 23.8% to
14.6%.

EXPERTS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT

-- Jerry C. Lindsley, director, Sacred Heart University Polling Institute
-- James Castonguay, Ph.D., associate professor and chair, Sacred Heart
University's Department of Media Studies & Digital Culture

Statistically, a sample of 800 completed telephone interviews represents a
margin for error of +/-3.5% at a 95% confidence level.
applause
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
Zeloniy
Richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jan 10, 2008, 7:35 PM CST
... news? Nooo ...

"Talk directly to news makers" - ABC News website

That's the key phrase, American "news" isn't reported, it's manufactured.

American news are a god damned circus show. Fox News is a top clown, sorry. laugh

I got used to a lot of things over the years but never could tolerate news and bread. My idea of news is a single reporter delivering facts with ZERO personal opinion. They smile when they start reporting news and smile when they finish.

These people flirt with each other on national television. rolling on the floor laughing

If I want news I'll watch BBC
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jan 10, 2008, 7:59 PM CST


I semi-agree with you. One should NEVER know the newscaster's personal opinion by the way the news is presented.

In this day and age I almost question every adverb or adjective I hear in a news cast as to how much slant is being given.

Wouldn't the BBC be the equivelant of the National Public Television? I'm not familiar. If that's the case, it would be a far left-wing news cast. dunno
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
Zeloniy
Richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jan 10, 2008, 11:04 PM CST
In response to:


I semi-agree with you. One should NEVER know the newscaster's personal opinion by the way the news is presented.

In this day and age I almost question every adverb or adjective I hear in a news cast as to how much slant is being given.

Wouldn't the BBC be the equivelant of the National Public Television? I'm not familiar. If that's the case, it would be a far left-wing news cast.
British Broadcasting Company or something of a sort ...

I've been told that before. My best friend is a republican. Not extreme right by any means though laugh I think BBC is unbiased because a foreign country has no agenda in our affairs, even a country as closely related as GB.
PBS is PBS ... public bs ..
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 5:22 AM CST


Not sure I agree, but to each his own.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Dublin dating
skimpydoo
Dublin, Dublin Ireland
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 5:28 AM CST
When George and Laura Bush visited England after the war in Iraq started there was major protests including the toppling of a statue of George Bush in Trafalgar square. This was reported on and shown in the news in Britain. In America this was not shown and Laura Bush said the peolpe were so friendly and welcoming.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 3:33 PM CST
In response to:
When George and Laura Bush visited England after the war in Iraq started there was major protests including the toppling of a statue of George Bush in Trafalgar square. This was reported on and shown in the news in Britain. In America this was not shown and Laura Bush said the peolpe were so friendly and welcoming.


Amazing that a statue of "W" would be erected 2 years after his presidency? Most Brits are friendly, I have found. At least that's what I would prefer to think.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Jan1305
(Moscow region temporarily), Murcia Spain
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 3:43 PM CST
In response to:


Amazing that a statue of "W" would be erected 2 years after his presidency? Most Brits are friendly, I have found. At least that's what I would prefer to think.
It's true...don't just prefer to think it...friendly but with strong opinions, personally speaking of course.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 3:49 PM CST
In response to:
When George and Laura Bush visited England after the war in Iraq started there was major protests including the toppling of a statue of George Bush in Trafalgar square. This was reported on and shown in the news in Britain. In America this was not shown and Laura Bush said the peolpe were so friendly and welcoming.
lmao rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing
There was actually a statue of George Bush in England!?!?!
omg rolling on the floor laughing



..................WHY????
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 4:53 PM CST
In response to:
lmao
There was actually a statue of George Bush in England!?!?!
omg



..................WHY????



There's probably one of Hillary too, if we knew the truth. laugh

I shall google the W statue/article...... (It's called, trust but verify) laugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 4:54 PM CST
In response to:



There's probably one of Hillary too, if we knew the truth.

I shall google the W statue/article...... (It's called, trust but verify)
Let me know what you find out!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jan 11, 2008, 4:57 PM CST
In response to:
Let me know what you find out!


From the pictures I was able to view it was a Muslim protest in 2003 (mainly). (I'm not sure why they'd care? They're peaceful, loving and also British citizens.

There's not a close up of the statue, but it looks like it could be paper mache' painted gold. Wish the poster had been a bit more forthright in his description.

professor
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »