Posted: Jan 18, 2008, 7:30 PM CST
Point I make here is this. Kerry/Edwards would have had the same military forces as Bush had for AF. Was It Bush's fault that bin Laden slipped through into Pakistan? Or that maybe that with the locals supportings him, he would have slipped thru no matter who was in the White House? No matter matter what forces we deployed?
The Russians chased him around for a long time too and did not get him.
bin Laden and his group have been in these mountians for years. Tora
Bora had been used by them during the Russian/Afghan war, years earlier. Terrian plays a big part here. They knew the terrian. In AF that favors the kind of operations and activities that AlQueada uses. This was a tough capture. What additional forces do you think Kerry/Edwards could have deployed or what other decisions they could have made to make it happen?
As for Iraq. I do agree. Other that taking a out a brutal dictator. Iraq is
an error. We have placed a lot of political capitol into Iraq. But is there return here? Are we going to get a democractic Iraq our this? And have we gotten closer to solving the real issues of Islamic terrorism?
Those are all questions up in the air.
This is not to say that our people there, have not done great things. They have. They often have been outnumbered in this urban environment fight. Often coming into well prepared positions of the enemy. And they have reduced the violence there. The surge has worked to a degree. A future withdrawal can be done....maybe a fast one or slower paced one.