Posted: Feb 12, 2008, 2:35 PM CST
BnaturAl wrote:Dude there is a huge difference between the 'face' of eugenics, the one portayed to the public and eugenics led behind the scenes. But thanks for webpage. You can also look into Planned Parenting as well, but again these are the forerunners, leaders and the 'faces' of eugenics, not to be confused with how far it's been taken by private enterprise.
My commment about baby factories was a reference to a social responsibility we have not to overpopulate. Any number of people having kids just for the sake of having kids. Over popualtion requires and uses up resources. Those resources will reach an end.
This thread is about many things including e n d g a m e, eugenics, even ego. One little web page becomes insignificant in light of the broader topic. Follow your own advice, do some more research ... just a suggestion I'm sure you would make.
I don't see it as a face, but an aspect of eugenics. By calling it a face you automatically make all sorts of connections b/w different eugenic philosophies that are not necessarily there.
My use of baby factories was a reference to genetic manipulaton, I guess i missed your point there. But as for social responsibility, the paradox here that the people who realize that social responsiblity, the ones most responsible and intelligent stop reproducing and our governments do everything possible to encourage the irresponsible ones to reproduce. Preventing that from happening is part of eugenics.
Fine, this thread is about different things. My point is that it's just too much about the most common misconceptions, speculations and blanket statements. I know I shouldn't be expecting much more, one reason being that the general public is not interested in discussing but commenting on the subject du jour - eugenics. (this is CS Lounge, after all). Still, that's the way it is. Research? So far, the only research I see your posts coming from is "Conspiracy Theory Association of America"

Why didn't you post any of those resources in the beginning? I'm sure people would gladly take a look rather than speculate about how rich are out to get them and their kids.
riyablossom -> I agree, the test tubes baby aspect of eugenics is more than concerning. My only question is, how big of a concern it really is nowadays? I don't believe people who go up in arms and invent 10 conspiracy theories when a secret society has a meeting.
j goose -> I said:"Obviously, I'm not going to write an eugenics essay here as I don't know enough on the subject"
you said: "why post at all?"
Simple. Anything else than "writing an essay". This couldn't be clearer. I only posted to point out that, while eugenics is definitely a subject for discussion, there's no point in wondering when rich will castrate the poor, nuke us all or other such nonsense.