Connecting Singles^® Forums 100% Free Online Dating

mindfful: HUGZ!


i am shocked and dismayed.

but-

Sparky55: Yes Marina I used the word "believed" because it was never determined where the whole thing started (Reporters have to protect their sources) In using that word I was trying not to unfairly place blame for the origins of the rumor on the Clintons.

You are very pointed with your critique of people not using common sense or their brains and are basing their choices for their candidate on feelings and emotions. This statement has some merit because there are some people who operate on that level. However, I would submit to you that you are doing the same thing or worse when you base your opinions on Obama, his supporters and the average American voter based on your feelings and emotions. Afterall, can you prove Obama is a Muslim? Or did you arrive to your conclusion by other means? If you could show me some kind of proof as to his association it would be different but the fact is, you haven't thus far.

As you may have noticed from my earlier posts throughout the CS threads, I think Obama is the best candidate on the Dem side but I do not support him to become president and really hope he's not elected. I only want to see him lose based on his political beliefs rather than false allegations. Who knows, if he is elected, he may do a lell of a job and we would have run the risk of missing out on it because of a lie.

lorraine: He clearly is not Muslim, but what if he was.
Not all Muslim's plot against the u.s.
How can people generalize so much

OUTRAGEOUS: I have a question: Isn't freedom of speech, freedom of religious belief, freedom of almost everything, a big part of the US Constitution?

By law, does the Elected President of the United States of America, has to be Catholic? If so, then, Catholicism trumps freedom of speech and freedom of religious belief, making the whole thing a big lie?

Harleyquinn: What can the jihadist muslims do to destroy the US from the inside out that the bush admin have not already done?

SHANTI

OUTRAGEOUS: I have a question: Isn't freedom of speech, freedom of religious belief, freedom of almost everything, a big part of the US Constitution?

By law, does the Elected President of the United States of America, has to be Catholic? If so, then, Catholicism trumps freedom of speech and freedom of religious belief, making the whole thing a big lie?

thewall2: Who cares.......more importantly........who is THEWALL2.........THAT'S what the people want to know.

thewall2: Who cares.......more importantly........who is THEWALL2.........THAT'S what the people want to know.

TTom50: The Constitution of the United States makes no requirement of canidates to have any 'declared' association of faith or religion.
Unlike many governments of the 15th, 16th and 17th century, a
declared faith had to be publically announced to hold office or
position.

The Constitution of the United States is uniquely different from
the other governments of the time in this regard. So no, you
don't have to be Catholic to be President of the United States.

Indyfella: With a ludicrous statement like that, may I ask what's been done? Clear examples preferred as I'm fairly simple?

Harleyquinn: Ludicrous or lucid??

Brother if you honestly cannot think of at least 1 thing, then maybe
you should change your name to Simon. Simple enough?
SHANTI