tryandcatchme72
corning, New York USA
Posted: Mar 25, 2008, 12:23 AM CST
To run the court system with no human emotion is Ludacris! Maybe we should get rid of all Judges and have our court be nothing more then a computer. We have the know how, just program a computer feed the information of the crime into the computer, and accept the fine or time you need to pay. You won't need a lawyer! there is no arguing to a computer. You did something that was a mistake you didn't mean to do it, it was an accident. Plead with the murcy of the court, Oh yeah there is no mercy you did it go to jail! next. While we are at it lets go a step further. Why do we need a president or any poloticians lets just program a computer to run the country? We wont have to be concerned with a computers back ground, or the back ground of the computers family. Never was there a computer that smoked pot but just did not inhale! Never has a computer lied to the public never did it cheat on it's wife. Don't we want the country to be run with no emotion or feelings?
But before you start making software to replace our judges better think do you want to take your son or daughter back to court and have that slap on the wrist revoked and found guilty? How many people have been in court for one reason or another, and felt that if they had gotten the extent of what the law could give it would have been a lot worse? Are you ready to go back and face a computer that can not see in your face how sorry and scared you are, a computer that is not going to give you any chance of walking out with out paying for what you did?
I am starting to see here a very bad sifi movie. Ok so thats an axageration, or is it? Is not the governor of CA the Terminator? Wasn't that world run by emotionless computers?
The basic artical here though is the 10 commandments in a court room. Ok so with it being there, half the population does not believe that God has any buisness in the courts.
Tell me how many people did it fall down on and leave brain dammaged? How many people did it bite? If you don't beleive in them the don't read them! Simple! you say it infringes on your right on what you believe or don't. I don't see how? And what about the other half of the people who do believe? You can beleive what you like and if they ofend you don't look at them! the other half who does beleive, where it wont bite you or cause you harm, for them it maybe there one shred of hope. Arnt we infringing on the beleivers more?
I personally don't know that I beleive in God, but the 10 comandments does not ofend me, And I guess if it did I would turn my head away from them. But I will fight for the rights of all that does beleive. They have the right to see them and give them hope!
And one last question? It is ok to fire a judge for not wanting to take down the 10 comandments, But havn't you overlooked the fact that you are sworn in and beleived to be telling the truth only because you have sworn with you hand on the bible that you will? Why should it be right, a judge be taken from the bench for not removing the 10 comandments and the judge who takes over allows you to swear on a bible isn't that a little hypocritical????