Posted: Mar 26, 2008, 10:21 AM CST
Sparky55 wrote:Manolito,
I understand what you're saying, I really do but what you may be missing is that those people you refer to as shooting other people are criminals.
I honestly can't remember the last time I heard about an average guy or gal pulling out a hand gun in anger and killing someone with the exception of the ocassional murder-suicide scenario. I'm sure it happens but not often.
What does happen very often is an armed criminal accidently or on purpose kills someone during a robbery, home intrusion, etc... Then there's gang bangers and drug dealers shooting each other which we always hear about.
You acknowledge that all criminals will all have guns. Does it make sense to take away the rights of law abiding citizens to maintain an equal footing? To me it doesn't and I don't believe the size or length of the gun would matter a whole lot.
(Isn't that just like a man to say size doesn't matter)
Seriously, banning handguns for those who already obey the law will result in only criminals having them. There's also the issue of the right to bear arms which has been discussed here several times.
What about school shootings and the crimes commited hot-blooded ? Would they still happen (and with that intensity) if it was very difficult for non-crimanals to own specific types of guns?
Do you feel the need to carry a handgun with you for your safety? Or you just want the right to own guns so you can defend your family / home / property if you need to?
I have never lived in the US, so i do not know how life is there. All i know is what i can occasionally see on the news channel, papers or the net. So i am just feeling out for an oppinion on this, trying to understand.
The last school shooting i remember of, was done with semiautomatic handguns. I suppose that they are legal there (i am not sure which kind of guns are legal there).
So, one of the arguments here is that "guns" is a very broad term and maybe the kind/type of what you are allowed to own could be regulated...