Posted: Apr 7, 2008, 9:53 AM CST
So it has been quiet awhile since you have been in he south, Opal.
Almost 40 years. I have been here since 1980. Going on 30 years. More recent years.
I seen have churchs of mixed races. I seen gov't committees of all shades. I have seen high school and college sports teams of all colors. I have seen school teachers of every gender and color teaching in the same school complex of kids of every shade. I have lunch, in the same building with white, black, brown, green, purple....all the shades of the rainbow. That is the south of today.
I have also heard a white racist remark and a black racial remark and put them on the same level, Opal.....both are racial. I don't deny that racism exists in society. I just say it exist on both sides. With out slighly painting the other color.
So you are a racist? Or were a racist to be more accurate. So you
then feel that racism is wrong or you would not have made the change........then why cannot you say what the Rev Wright is....because you have this political position that has you locked into on into the far left and into defending him for Barak.....that hurts Barak more than it helps him.
You look back into the south 40 years ago....say oh that old south could never change. But you did. You look at the race debate going on today in our country, have a biased opinion of right and wrong and can then paint with Barak. Sutley and slighly...but still the same paint brush and the venom as Rev. Wright. Just the difference of oil bases colors and water based colors. One is deep and the other is thin.
I think that there are blacks....that have little or no color bias to them. I also think that there are whites in the same boat. That you changed from a racist at one time....says you tried to make it into this boat. Keep trying, you can do it. The thing is in life we constantly can dilute this color issue with either words of encouragement and unity. Or we can deepen with words of hate and anger.
In Union Cooper, Lincoln called blacks slaves 'ignorant'. Today that same comment, if taken by Rev. Wright and many would paint Lincoln as a racist. That is the standard blacks have set. I only hold them to it. In the day of the comment, it was a very accurate and honest word to use because black's had little or no formal education. It was the only negative word, he said of the blacks in that very long address. Rev Wright would turn it into a rant......of vile and hate.....and distort what Lincoln did for the Black slaves to make him a white racist, like all typical whites are according to Barak.
When blacks hear a word of critism or negativity from a white...they call it racism. Is not the standard the same then for the white, when he hears a word of negativity from the blacks? The far left and blacks take a comment like G. Ferrero of Obama, and it becomes racial. But when it is black comment like Obama on typical white women, it is not.
What goes on Opal, if not reverse racism here?
So where is the real racism? In a hour sermon of ranting hateful things or in a one misspoken word/phrase in a hour long speech? Obama made one mispoken phrase in my opinion and failed to sever with Rev Wright. He says things have gotten better in race relationship with the US. And they have.
But as long as he keeps the relationship with Rev. Wright.....he will have a very dark color to dilute in his painting of the American scene. And the supporting far left, will throw in all of the much darker colors of anger/hate/vile in defending him and Rev Wright...the far left is killing his chances, Opal.
But is there racism in the country? Yes on both sides and with many shades. Men of either color like Rev.Wright don't want to dilute it. They want to exploit and grow it. And you don't get rid of it that way. Barak honestly does want to dilute it, in my opinion. It is too bad he is caught were he is. And yes, it does shade Obama's character.....