Thread:

Here's what the "W"could stand for in George W. Bush.

Category:
Jokes & Humor
page: 1 2 3 of 3

Here's what the "W"could stand for in George W. Bush.




opalbeauty
Worcester County USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 5:29 PM CST
HealthyLiving wrote:
Whore.... Money Whore!


or corporate prostittute
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
RobbieM
Hertford, Hertfordshire, England UK
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 5:30 PM CST
I think the most appropriate "W" to describe George at the moment is worried!!

Not only is he worried how he will go down in history as a leader, he's also worried a lynching party maybe getting together.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



opalbeauty
Worcester County USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 5:30 PM CST
Zeelander wrote:
Actually, I dislike all politicians. What we need is a preson for the people. I just think name calling does no one any justice.

Zee


ahhh, we're just having some fun. sticking out tongue laugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



opalbeauty
Worcester County USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 5:31 PM CST
RobbieM wrote:
I think the most appropriate "W" to describe George at the moment is worried!!

Not only is he worried how he will go down in history as a leader, he's also worried a lynching party maybe getting together.


robbie, what's a wanker?
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
RobbieM
Hertford, Hertfordshire, England UK
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 5:34 PM CST
opalbeauty wrote:
robbie, what's a wanker?


rolling on the floor laughing Well, it's been said he's one of them as well!!!laugh

Now how do i go about explaining that word without offending anyonelaugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
North Carolina personals
davidnc76
Sanford, North Carolina USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 5:51 PM CST
Worst (President since "Tricky Dick" Nixon)
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



metalartist989
Midland USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 10:26 PM CST
davidnc76 wrote:
Worst (President since "Tricky Dick" Nixon)


hmm.. odd.. considering that most of your posts have been about how we need to get out of Iraq and Nixon was the one who got us out of Vietnam.

Nixon had been elected on a promise to Vietnamize the war, meaning more fighting would be turned over to the South Vietnamese army, and to start bringing home American troops.

When the President ordered US troops into Cambodia and ordered more bombings, the result was a tremendous uproar at home with more marches and demonstrations.

Congress reacted to the antiwar feeling and repealed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution which gave the President (Johnson.. a democrat) the authority to send troops and fight the war in Vietnam.

The United States did not lose the Vietnam War. Although some may argue that by pulling out of South Vietnam we did just that.

In 1972, North Vietnam finally realized that the war was a stalemate. The two sides met and arranged a cease fire.

In January of 1973 the Paris Accords went into effect. The US agreed to withdraw all its troops from Vietnam in 60 days. Congress had stopped funding the war effort. The North Vietnamese government agreed to release all prisoners, which they never did. Free elections were to be held in Vietnam. The President of South Vietnam considered the agreement between North Vietnam and the US as a sell out. But it allowed President Nixon to save face and bring the soldiers home.

By 1975, after US troops had been pulled out of South Vietnam, the ARVN (Army of the Republic of South Vietnam) collapsed and the North Vietnamese moved into Saigon, ending the war and finalizing the take over of the South by the North.


..so Iraq is another Vietnam? ....so does that make you a hippie?
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Texas singles
LiveWyre
Woo WooTown, Texas USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 10:32 PM CST
Wuss
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
New York singles
Rickster
New York, New York USA
Posted: Jul 1, 2008, 10:50 PM CST
Wanker
conversing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri singles
rasgumby
Moberly, Missouri USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 12:15 AM CST
War Criminal!peace
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
lorax111
richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 1:25 AM CST
metalartist989 wrote:
hmm.. odd.. considering that most of your posts have been about how we need to get out of Iraq and Nixon was the one who got us out of Vietnam.

Nixon had been elected on a promise to Vietnamize the war, meaning more fighting would be turned over to the South Vietnamese army, and to start bringing home American troops.

When the President ordered US troops into Cambodia and ordered more bombings, the result was a tremendous uproar at home with more marches and demonstrations.

Congress reacted to the antiwar feeling and repealed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution which gave the President (Johnson.. a democrat) the authority to send troops and fight the war in Vietnam.

The United States did not lose the Vietnam War. Although some may argue that by pulling out of South Vietnam we did just that.

In 1972, North Vietnam finally realized that the war was a stalemate. The two sides met and arranged a cease fire.

In January of 1973 the Paris Accords went into effect. The US agreed to withdraw all its troops from Vietnam in 60 days. Congress had stopped funding the war effort. The North Vietnamese government agreed to release all prisoners, which they never did. Free elections were to be held in Vietnam. The President of South Vietnam considered the agreement between North Vietnam and the US as a sell out. But it allowed President Nixon to save face and bring the soldiers home.

By 1975, after US troops had been pulled out of South Vietnam, the ARVN (Army of the Republic of South Vietnam) collapsed and the North Vietnamese moved into Saigon, ending the war and finalizing the take over of the South by the North. ..so Iraq is another Vietnam? ....so does that make you a hippie?


In todays world wars are not won ,we took afgaiistan and then gave it back. wtf is the point .

Dennis
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



metalartist989
Midland USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 10:51 AM CST
..and you're making this statement based on your vast experience with the military I take it..

Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
lorax111
richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 11:51 AM CST
um yup
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



metalartist989
Midland USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 6:23 PM CST
lorax111 wrote:
um yup


ok so what makes you think Afghanistan was "given back" ..considering it's still occupied by NATO and US forces. The "Taliban" is barely in existence.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
lorax111
richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 8:36 PM CST
metalartist989 wrote:
ok so what makes you think Afghanistan was "given back" ..considering it's still occupied by NATO and US forces. The "Taliban" is barely in existence.



Is it going to be a part of the united states? Do we own the soil now?


Dennis

Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
lorax111
richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 8:43 PM CST
Sun Tzu said that you take land and treat its people as friends, we are doing the opposite.


Dennis
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



bluewolf8514
Angels Haven, West Virginia USA
Posted: Jul 2, 2008, 10:58 PM CST
WHOOOOSH

That was the sound of the breeze blowing through his ears OR

All the money that was sucked out of your taxes thats been wasted on, well whatever he wanted to waste it on. Of course is he any better or worse than any other president we've ever had? Quick, name the last honest President of the US. confused

Even my mom at age 83 said he was an idiot, said she didnt like him because of the constant smirk on his face.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



metalartist989
Midland USA
Posted: Jul 3, 2008, 9:29 AM CST
lorax111 wrote:
Is it going to be a part of the united states? Do we own the soil now? Dennis


you're too ignorant to have a discussion with.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Virginia singles
lorax111
richmond, Virginia USA
Posted: Jul 3, 2008, 9:26 PM CST
metalartist989 wrote:
you're too ignorant to have a discussion with.



Perhaps I do not say what you want to hear. I do not mind you not likeing what I say. Personaly I think that I would enjoy a discussion with you. If you could find a way to not get upset by people you will never meet. I am less abrasive to people that are not hostile to me.


Dennis
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
California singles
rwantin
Costa Mesa, California USA
Posted: Jul 3, 2008, 9:43 PM CST
War-monging? confused
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: 1 2 3 of 3

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »