Thread:

lawful marriage of living together ?

Category:
Dating & Relating
page: 1 2 of 2

lawful marriage of living together ?

India dating
indienartz
Close to your heart India
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 9:32 AM CST
gangel wrote:
Marriage is potent. It has the force of law, economic advantages, is a sacrament to many religious faiths, and to be married is to generally be held in higher esteem than to merely be a couple cohabiting.


Yes but it also brings in responsibility and legal problems. There are laws which force couples to stay together even if one or both of the partners want to walk out. I don't want to fall into nitty gritties of who is at fault or the outcomes of failed mairriage- one big thing is that it is waste of life if one has to stay forcibly into a relationship which he or she does not enjoy anymore just because of legal formalities. No one wants to waste precious years of life in courtroom battle for divorce if mairrage fails. So better is live in relationship and what differencer does it make whether you have a government approval or not to stay together till the time they are commited to each other.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
gangel
Plovdiv, Plovdiv Bulgaria
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 9:34 AM CST
indienartz wrote:
Yes but it also brings in responsibility and legal problems. There are laws which force couples to stay together even if one or both of the partners want to walk out. I don't want to fall into nitty gritties of who is at fault or the outcomes of failed mairriage- one big thing is that it is waste of life if one has to stay forcibly into a relationship which he or she does not enjoy anymore just because of legal formalities. No one wants to waste precious years of life in courtroom battle for divorce if mairrage fails. So better is live in relationship and what differencer does it make whether you have a government approval or not to stay together till the time they are commited to each other.


I don't know your laws. dunno
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
India dating
indienartz
Close to your heart India
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 9:34 AM CST
gangel wrote:
Marriage is potent. It has the force of law, economic advantages, is a sacrament to many religious faiths, and to be married is to generally be held in higher esteem than to merely be a couple cohabiting.


And yes the economic advantage that one can claim half of the hubby's wealth inspite of walking away of relationship- MAKES GREAT SENSE TO GET MARRIED- GREAT INCENTIVE BY LAWcomfort
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
gangel
Plovdiv, Plovdiv Bulgaria
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 9:37 AM CST
indienartz wrote:
And yes the economic advantage that one can claim half of the hubby's wealth inspite of walking away of relationship- MAKES GREAT SENSE TO GET MARRIED- GREAT INCENTIVE BY LAW



wave I think you got me wrong.giggle
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



morganlee
Qawra, Majjistral Malta
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 9:39 AM CST
I have been married and stayed married for 15yrs for the sake of my children. I would not marry again. If you love a person i don't think you need to marry to prove that point and if you marry for the 'protection ' it is supposed to bring that is the wrong reason in the first place. If a marriage doesn't work out and gets to a divorce the only people that win are the lawyers, with there fat costs cashing in on others unhapiness. jmo
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



morganlee
Qawra, Majjistral Malta
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 9:41 AM CST
indienartz wrote:
And yes the economic advantage that one can claim half of the hubby's wealth inspite of walking away of relationship- MAKES GREAT SENSE TO GET MARRIED- GREAT INCENTIVE BY LAW
You don't walk away with half your husbands wealth in all cases, please don't generalize wine
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Scotland singles
bren1
Bucks, Buckinghamshire, England UK
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 10:02 AM CST
morganlee wrote:
I have been married and stayed married for 15yrs for the sake of my children. I would not marry again. If you love a person i don't think you need to marry to prove that point and if you marry for the 'protection ' it is supposed to bring that is the wrong reason in the first place. If a marriage doesn't work out and gets to a divorce the only people that win are the lawyers, with there fat costs cashing in on others unhapiness. jmo


Hi Morganwave thumbs up
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



morganlee
Qawra, Majjistral Malta
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 10:22 AM CST
bren1 wrote:
Hi Morgan
Ho bren, hope your ok hug
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
mychelle
Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 1:20 PM CST
PingPong wrote:
Sorry for not being explicit. Yes, I mean why do people tend to live together and stay single.

They tend to live together and stay single because it's more acceptable now. There is no pressure to get married unless there is a legitimate reason behind it...i.e. children, immigration, religion, medical/insurance benefits, future inheritance for kids, spousal benefits.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



kurzita
Xaghra, Gozo Malta
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 1:41 PM CST
There is one area that does not seem to have been covered here.

In bothe scenarios, wether leglly married or cohabiting, it means that two people are to share all of thier time together.

There are those, like myself, who opt to have thier own space and time, i.e. stay single for the sake of enjoying being so.

I have been in both marriage, and co-habitation. I was living as single before I got married, and again aftr that. And I prefer it that way.

Living with someone is a choice.

Marrying someone is a commitment. It works if both parties are working towards the same goals. Mostly that of raising a family together. Otherwise, don't get married

I personally definately would not get married again. Too many legal complications.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
mychelle
Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 3:18 PM CST
Living together single may also be for economic reason, one household, one rent/mortgage, 1-2 cars, instead of splitting up the finances and having 2 different homes, 3 cars, a van and a
jeep, commuting all that distance and visiting in between.:yay
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
mychelle
Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 3:21 PM CST
joanie04984 wrote:
Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?

If you buy the cow you will always have milk freeyay
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
mychelle
Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 3:23 PM CST
The_Kansan wrote:
Or why buy the pig when all you're after is a little sausage?

you can get more sausages if you buy the whole pig. yay
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
gangel
Plovdiv, Plovdiv Bulgaria
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 3:23 PM CST
mychelle wrote:
you can get more sausages if you buy the whole pig.



laugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
England personals
a_l_e_x
london, Outer London, England UK
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 4:25 PM CST
don't eat all the chocolates they will only make you sick.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



kurzita
Xaghra, Gozo Malta
Posted: Apr 12, 2008, 4:58 PM CST
mychelle wrote:
If you buy the cow you will always have milk free


Noway!!! Milk ain't free......

Have to feed the cow don't you??

laugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: 1 2 of 2

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »