Connecting Singles^® Forums100% Free Online Dating

OOOOOPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSS...Part of my post went someplace....


It should read:


the best arent should always have custody.....I was thinking about both Susan Smith and Andrea Yates...

I don't believe Britney's children being taken away had anything to do with language, culture, religeon, etc..

Britney's mental well being is in question. I'm not sure if she's been diagonsed, treated etc... But, based on her behavior during the time the initial court cases were going on, she did not seem capable of taking care of herself. That being the case, she was in no position to care for her children. I think the judge made a good decision and as much as Britney's behavior disgusts me, I do hope she seeks help and is one day capable of being reunited with them and carrying on as normal a relationship as is possible even if she never receives custody.

I dont know what his personal experiences are to be honest nor am I interested....I just think its a sad day when people are happy to jump on the back of one disturbed and sick individual....

take away all that...she is still a lousy mother who does not think of her childrens safety.



And I am not here to get your approval of what I say any more than I give a rats patooty about yours or Portieus

Whether you respond means absolutely nothing to me.



You started this by accusing me of nor caring about her children...I think I care more than she does.

couldn't agree more

I don't think anyone is against Britney Spears getting mentally well, and after demonstrating she is fit to be a mother, assuming access to her kids and being part of their life.

What I don't understand is how you can put her well being before the well being of the kids, when she has clearly put their well being at risk with her mental state. confused:

In a nutshell....what I was saying

Yeah Im not explaining it very well...im trying to shield myself from the attacks from above
all I was trying to say was that the contact between mother and child should never be severed completely unless its a last resort and all other avenues have been exhausted .....thats all

sorry that last post was for you mikeemike

Damn I wish there was a middle finger emoticom on here

yes....don't we both!!

Och I give up fighting with you im too tired

thanks Crystal 29, I think we share similiar views, although a very complex issue and alot of people get hurt, both short term and long term thumbsup:

Thanks Mike it is complex and nothing is black and white....cheers

:



I win!!



O.K. now I apologise for calling you an idiot. I truley am sorry and it was not called for


BUT I WON!!!

Erm I dont think so
but thank you for your apology...graciously accepted
But you DID NOT WIN

You come on !
How many Andrea Yates or Susan Smiths do we need?
We have way too many screwed up mothers being left with their kids and the kids end up dead.

The kids come first. Period!

And if you think otherwise, You have not been around drug addict parents.

I have seen many that the drugs are more important than anything in life.
Given chance after chance by the courts, to give up drugs so they can keep their kids.. but most refuse to give up the drugs and the kids end up taken away.

How can anyone think Britney is a fit Mother?
and she already had supervised visitation- remember?
And think back... what happened?
They had to call the cops because of her crazy- drug induced behavior!