Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:37 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:I have already stated that neither was my purpose. Yet you have failed to comprehend this.
Actually it appears your record has developed a scratch right near the word "postulate" which you repeat over and over again. You can always tell when someone learns a new word they keep using it.
Is this supposed to be comedy? Don't quit your day job.
Go read "you" amateur (You spelled it amatuer) psychology books? Noone has been stuck on psychology here but you. I have repeatedly told you "Freud" is not my source as you believe him to be.
Actually my last post verifies that a debunking did indeed take place. Ignoring your failure will not make it disappear. A true intellect has arrived. I don't "play smart" like you. I am smart.
Weak. Next.
ok. Let's make this really easy shall we?
1)Tell us your experience in behavioural sciences,and which professional psychology papers you have written, and where you chair in which faculty, as we are clearly supposed to be impressed by your sixth form way of debating.
2)Tell us about your volume of experience in professional childcare.
You might like to also check your spell checker.
Go read "you" amateur (You spelled it amatuer) psychology books?
Noone has been stuck on psychology here but you. I have repeatedly told you "Freud" is not my source as you believe him to be.
This is getting tedious now, you really on thin ice before and should have stuck on equality, but you have way overreached your ability to express yourself without resorting to "having a pop at all the individuals who don't agree with you".
That is weak, want to debate then debate, but you undermined any credibility you had long ago.
Feel free to run the spell checker again if it makes you feel superior
