Thread:

ARE THERE ANY REAL WOMEN LEFT?

Category:
CS Lounge (misc.)
page: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> of 23

ARE THERE ANY REAL WOMEN LEFT?

Illinois personals
friendsfirst
Burbank, Illinois USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:50 PM CST
You need to play this LOUDLY!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=GnWxymjjgBA


help help help
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Portiea
Konstanz, Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:50 PM CST
Uh oh.....where'd he go? You meanies scared him away....You're supposed to be nice to the newbies and respectfully accept everyone's opinion and now look...scold scold
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Ontario personals
Hugz_n_Kissez
Someplace, Ontario Canada
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:51 PM CST
Portiea wrote:
Uh oh.....where'd he go? You meanies scared him away....You're supposed to be nice to the newbies and respectfully accept everyone's opinion and now look...



I was being nice and agreeing with him...even worshipped him and that still wasn't good enough....rolling eyes professor dunno uh oh!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
LBGuy777
Wanamassa, New Jersey USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:56 PM CST
RobbieM wrote:
ok. Let's make this really easy shall we?


The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.

In response to:
1)Tell us your experience in behavioural sciences,and which professional psychology papers you have written, and where you chair in which faculty, as we are clearly supposed to be impressed by your sixth form way of debating.


Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.

In response to:
2)Tell us about your volume of experience in professional childcare.


No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.

In response to:
You might like to also check your spell checker.


The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.

In response to:
This is getting tedious now, you really on thin ice before and should have stuck on equality, but you have way overreached your ability to express yourself without resorting to "having a pop at all the individuals who don't agree with you".


Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.

In response to:
That is weak, want to debate then debate, but you undermined any credibility you had long ago.


A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
LBGuy777
Wanamassa, New Jersey USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:57 PM CST
blissfull wrote:
this has been a most interesting thread to follow. actually very educational.

LBGUY you are entitled to your preferences, those who counter are equally entitled to their's.

my only real comment here is one i made up years ago, "nothing is ever always anything". There ARE strong self reliant woman seeking the same in a man, finding em is your challenge. Finding a man secure enough to deal with their level of conviction is their's.

good luck in your quest

bliss


I agree. Thanks for posting.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Zrich dating
Conrad73
Lonesome Town Zurich , Zrich Switzerland
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:58 PM CST
cristina wrote:
say 12h*7days= 84h ...this is a very hypothetical portray and you say 85?

can't see efficiency
Didn't take a Lunch-Hour one day==85 hrsgrin
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Ontario personals
Hugz_n_Kissez
Someplace, Ontario Canada
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:58 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.
Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.
No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.
The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.
Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.
A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.



bowing bowing bowing

Yeah dummy...Listen to the guru....rolling eyes professor wink grin
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri matchmaking
DadofDucks
Wentzville, Missouri USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 12:59 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.
Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.
No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.
The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.
Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.
A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.


I see hes moved on to SpellGod now...totally avoiding any real issues and answering any questions or responses with a dodge and a jab...HE IS A SLICK one....cheering cheering cheering
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
mikeeemike
Den Hague, Zuid-Holland Netherlands
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:01 PM CST
LBGuy777 have you got what you wanted out of this thread (i.e the answer to your original posting?).
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
LBGuy777
Wanamassa, New Jersey USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:02 PM CST
FlowerOfTheSun wrote:
I beg to differ!! "...the usage of whom is synonimous..." is invalid English
Whom can only ever refer to a person ... should be "the usage of which" ...
Also "whom" cannot always substitute the word "who" , only in certain cases depending where it is placed whithin a sentence.

Eg: To whom it may concern...
Whom did you call?
He is the man to whom I was married ... etc...

I have noticed many times how people often use "whom" (wrongly) in order to sound more educated


In response to:
Main Entry: who
Pronunciation: \'hü, ü\
Function: pronoun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English hwa; akin to Old High German hwer, interrog. pron., who, Latin quis, Greek tis, Latin qui, relative pron., who
Date: before 12th century

usage see whom, that


Also I said many times not "always" as verified by my own post: "To be frank the usage of whom is synonymous with who in many cases."

Keep digging you may find something. Heck, the psuedo-intellectual found that I did not separate NO ONE!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Portiea
Konstanz, Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:03 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
The "o" in "ok" should be capitalized.
Why would I reveal such things to you? Moreover, you seem to be "stuck" in proving to me that you know something about psychology. In all reality all you have shown is how simple-minded you are and that you are unable to focus on the issue at hand. Instead dwelling off into diatribes about psychology papers, faculty, etc. Stay focused.
No, but I am sure you will tell us about yours. As a matter of fact you post as if you are applying for a job rather than debating the issue at hand.
The word "you" was quoted from your post. And I see you managed to catch where I failed to put a space between no one. Wow. Let's see your numerous "spelling" mistakes to my failure to separate "no" and "one." You can't be serious.
Are you foreign? You sure spell like it. I'll let you sort that one out.
A debate can only take place if I have a worthy opponent to debate with. You fail to qualify.

You are starting to bore me. Have fun typing to yourself.


Why do you do this?

OK is an abbreviation of the word okay. As an abbreviation, if one were concerned about being correct, which we are not terribly concerned about here as we are just chatting, but, if one were so concerned, one would capitalize both the 'o' and the 'k'; however, if one were wishing to be absolutely correct, one would write the word out in full: okay?cheers
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Ontario personals
Hugz_n_Kissez
Someplace, Ontario Canada
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:04 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
Also I said many times not "always" as verified by my own post: "To be frank the usage of whom is synonymous with who in many cases."

Keep digging you may find something. Heck, the psuedo-intellectual found that I did not separate NO ONE!



professor cheering professor


smitten
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
LBGuy777
Wanamassa, New Jersey USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:08 PM CST
Portiea wrote:
Why do you do this?

OK is an abbreviation of the word okay. As an abbreviation, if one were concerned about being correct, which we are not terribly concerned about here as we are just chatting, but, if one were so concerned, one would capitalize both the 'o' and the 'k'; however, if one were wishing to be absolutely correct, one would write the word out in full: okay?


They teach you to capitalize the first word in a sentence in pre-school. Nine year olds can do it. You're making yourself look like even more of an idiot with your comments. Just keep quiet. laugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri matchmaking
DadofDucks
Wentzville, Missouri USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:11 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
They teach you to capitalize the first word in a sentence in pre-school. Nine year olds can do it. You're making yourself look like even more of an idiot with your comments. Just keep quiet.


Give it up and go away. Now your boring me and Im easily amused with my simple mind...comfort
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



Portiea
Konstanz, Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:11 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
They teach you to capitalize the first word in a sentence in pre-school. Nine year olds can do it. You're making yourself look like even more of an idiot with your comments. Just keep quiet.


As I tried to clarify for you, OK is not a word. The word is 'okay.' You poor thing? I keep wondering what is wrong with you or what you are on...dunno
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Ontario personals
Hugz_n_Kissez
Someplace, Ontario Canada
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:12 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
They teach you to capitalize the first word in a sentence in pre-school. Nine year olds can do it. You're making yourself look like even more of an idiot with your comments. Just keep quiet.


Intellectualism is soooooooo attractive...I think I'm in.....smitten



love heart
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
England dating
RobbieM
Hertford, Hertfordshire, England UK
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:13 PM CST
Well Done! You noticed i wasn't from the continental United States!!

I thought you were debating on a thread, not to me?

Try sticking to the facts, and generally when spouting non sense you generally have to have some qualifications for others to take on your theory to "Educate" others.

You are trying to educate us right? Seems like a rather dogmatic childish way to debate to me.

Funny, i didn't realise it was a competition either?

Your logic and debating skills are crap, but feel free to carry on impressing everyone with your sensitive side on childcare, equality and views on racism.

I personally don't think you have professional experience in either.Maybe you also look up methodology and constructing an argument as well, hypothesising is one thing but you seemed to have already jumped the evidence part, the experience part, the qualifications part and just jumped straight to dogma.

If this supposed to be your idea of conducting a debate, i have to say its useless!!

I'll look forward to your next thread on peace in the middle east, i can just imagine your an expert in that field as well.



grin
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Zrich dating
Conrad73
Lonesome Town Zurich , Zrich Switzerland
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:15 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
At this time I would like to inform you that you are incorrect in believing I am getting my information from "Freud's ideas." Care to try again?
And THAT exactly IS your problemD'oh! D'oh! D'oh!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Missouri matchmaking
DadofDucks
Wentzville, Missouri USA
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:15 PM CST
Hugz_n_Kissez wrote:
Intellectualism is soooooooo attractive...I think I'm in.....


I wish I was smart like hem...crying sigh dunno
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



bodleing
Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK
Posted: May 1, 2008, 1:16 PM CST
LBGuy777 wrote:
Are they all angry, petty, looking to exploit men for financial gain, emotionally unstable, unable to make decisions without consorting with their mothers and girlfriends, lesbian and/or man haters?


The answer to this is quite obviously....no.

But its a good way to start an argument.

Some people just thrive off confrontation,

not very attractive on a singles site though.

If you look hard enough, you may find one.

Somehow i doubt it.



Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> of 23

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »