Posted: May 28, 2008, 8:56 AM CST
j_goose71 wrote:Oh, YOU'RE back.....
Good to see ya, Mike. Haven't heard from ya in a while. I haven' been on much lately myself.
The Biblical God and Christ are based on much more ancient pagan religions. There are stories of great floods dating back to the ancient sumerians. Dionysus changed water into wine. Caspacious healed a blind man with spittle.
Not saying that there aren't good moral values to be learned from the bible, but to worship an invisible man, be it Horus (born of a virgin), Zeus (Earth Mover and God of Gods), or Christ, seems like a cop out. Using a diety to condone one's actions or inactions.
As far as archaeology proving the historical facts in the Bible. I beg to differ. Only Locations have been proven. Any good work of fiction does this also. (i.e. "Gone with the Wind")
There is no physical archaeological evidence of the exodus or Moses. There is no physical evidence of the existance of Jesus.
In fact there wer NO contemporary writers (i.e. eye witnesses) during the life of Christ. Not one. And historians during the years of 1AD to 33AD (note 33 is a symbolic number itself) make no mention of Jesus at all. There were many "Messiahs" running around during that time period, and they were mentioned by some, but no mention of christ. which makes me wonder if Jesus was someone made up by Paul in his scripture.
Hey Goose,
What does Attis, Cybele, Mithra, Adonis, Eleusis, Thrance, Dionysus, Osiris, and the like have in common? (I did not include Horus because Trish just introduced me to that one and I will have to get back to you on it)
They were all introduced as pre-Christ mythological figures with superficial similarities to the Gospel of Jesus. Written by the likes of J.M.Robertson, Kersey Graves, G.A. Wells, Joseph Campbell, and John Allegro. They were all celebrated as great works against those evil Christians.
They also slipped into anonymity when cross examination (by both Christian and secular scholars) showed their findings to be speculative at best. Their writings have been regarded as small, unimportant, and trifling. Even the well respected Sir Edwards Evan Pritchard writes in "Theories of Primitive Religion" that the evidence for these theories is "negligible".
The reason these and ideas like them (ideas against the evidence of Christianity) never go anywhere is they are eventually dismissed is that they are found to be without merit.
John Allegro's text "The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross" was refuted by more than 14 experts in Semetic languages and related fields.
Jesus split history in half. He claimed to be God. And His book has never been proven to be anything other than what it claims to be. If it were not so, then we would have had headlines around the world. "Bible proven to be false!", and then we would not hear from Christianity again. Except of course for those who would hang on to something like we see the polygamists doing in Eldorado.