If you are an older woman would you have sex with a younger man?

created by: getatme4050 | May 15, 2:24 AM CST
To vote: click your choice below
119 votes
page: 1 2 3 4 of 4

If you are an older woman would you have sex with a younger man?




Portiea
Konstanz, Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany
Posted: May 15, 2008, 9:32 AM CST
kissmedeeply wrote:
Sorry hun i meant to say i agree with you..just quoted you...40 year olds and up still have it


Actually my 40 year old (41 actually) was the best....everblushing batting eyelashes Unfortunatel, it takes more than sex to make a relationship worksigh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Alabama dating
alabamabebe
Banks of the Warrior River, Alabama USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 9:42 AM CST
Not true that younger men last longer, older men can usually control themselves better and hold out longer till their woman is satisfied. Just my experience anyway, the younger men I've been with was when I was younger also, and it was wham bam thank you m'am. Now, I'd go 10, maybe 15 years younger if I was looking, but we're still talking 40ish or close. My kid's age (late 20's), no way! I'd feel like a child molester!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Plovdiv dating
gangel
Plovdiv, Plovdiv Bulgaria
Posted: May 15, 2008, 4:36 PM CST
Nope
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Arizona dating
Serenity1971
Serenity's Island, Arizona USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:07 PM CST
vonney wrote:
Well I do know that myself and some of the other ladies felt that we would draw the line if the guy in question was in the same age bracket as our kids,



thumbs up Thanks Vonney....I know that definitely goes for me. I hve a 19yr old daughter...I definitely wouldn't go out wit someone or sleep with someone that would be a better match for her than me. 5 years younger is my max limit
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
Ambrose2007
Badger, South Dakota USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:34 PM CST
The thing about younger men and stamina is that while *potentially* younger men could probably maintain a harder erection for longer, in practice it's usually "wham, bam, thank you, ma'am," so I suspect that stamina is rarely an issue. I know that when I was younger it was all about "getting in" and the "getting it done." And as far as stamina...well, really, how long does a guy have to last to satisfy a lady? I mean, is 30 minutes long enough? An hour? Two hours? Aren't there are a variety of other factors - like touching, kissing, different strokes/positions - that add up to a good sexual experience? I know I experience sex now as a panoply of contact and movement - a good love-session being like a mutually created symphony of sensations.

I would say the main difference for between having sex now and in the past would be what I call the reliability of response: when you're in your twenties - thirties it's more or less automatic - it almost takes some countervailing force to prevent an erection. You don't have to worry much about being too tired or having eaten/drank too much - definite concerns for me if I want to be at my peak now. Another difference is the speed of achieving orgasm. In my twenties I could climax in 2 minutes flat - and more than occasionally didblushing rolling eyes. I have no problem with maintaining an erection once underway, but it sometimes can take awhile before having an orgasm. Occasionally that can prove a little frustrating, but when it comes it often seems far more intense than orgasms I recall from my youth. Also, I've learned that sex doesn't always have to end in ejaculation (it's possible to experience near-orgasmic states without ejaculation - another new thing about being older for me).

To me now, sex is far more about "the journey" than the destination. I feel free to enjoy all the sensations, and to let whatever may come come. So to speak.

confused wow! blushing wine
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
New Brunswick personals
kissmedeeply
New brunswick, New Brunswick Canada
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:37 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
The thing about younger men and stamina is that while *potentially* younger men could probably maintain a harder erection for longer, in practice it's usually "wham, bam, thank you, ma'am," so I suspect that stamina is rarely an issue. I know that when I was younger it was all about "getting in" and the "getting it done." And as far as stamina...well, really, how long does a guy have to last to satisfy a lady? I mean, is 30 minutes long enough? An hour? Two hours? Aren't there are a variety of other factors - like touching, kissing, different strokes/positions - that add up to a good sexual experience? I know I experience sex now as a panoply of contact and movement - a good love-session being like a mutually created symphony of sensations.

I would say the main difference for between having sex now and in the past would be what I call the reliability of response: when you're in your twenties - thirties it's more or less automatic - it almost takes some countervailing force to prevent an erection. You don't have to worry much about being too tired or having eaten/drank too much - definite concerns for me if I want to be at my peak now. Another difference is the speed of achieving orgasm. In my twenties I could climax in 2 minutes flat - and more than occasionally did . I have no problem with maintaining an erection once underway, but it sometimes can take awhile before having an orgasm. Occasionally that can prove a little frustrating, but when it comes it often seems far more intense than orgasms I recall from my youth. Also, I've learned that sex doesn't always have to end in ejaculation (it's possible to experience near-orgasmic states without ejaculation - another new thing about being older for me).

To me now, sex is far more about "the journey" than the destination. I feel free to enjoy all the sensations, and to let whatever may come come. So to speak.
Well said ambrosethumbs up
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:37 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
The thing about younger men and stamina is that while *potentially* younger men could probably maintain a harder erection for longer, in practice it's usually "wham, bam, thank you, ma'am," so I suspect that stamina is rarely an issue. I know that when I was younger it was all about "getting in" and the "getting it done." And as far as stamina...well, really, how long does a guy have to last to satisfy a lady? I mean, is 30 minutes long enough? An hour? Two hours? Aren't there are a variety of other factors - like touching, kissing, different strokes/positions - that add up to a good sexual experience? I know I experience sex now as a panoply of contact and movement - a good love-session being like a mutually created symphony of sensations.

I would say the main difference for between having sex now and in the past would be what I call the reliability of response: when you're in your twenties - thirties it's more or less automatic - it almost takes some countervailing force to prevent an erection. You don't have to worry much about being too tired or having eaten/drank too much - definite concerns for me if I want to be at my peak now. Another difference is the speed of achieving orgasm. In my twenties I could climax in 2 minutes flat - and more than occasionally did . I have no problem with maintaining an erection once underway, but it sometimes can take awhile before having an orgasm. Occasionally that can prove a little frustrating, but when it comes it often seems far more intense than orgasms I recall from my youth. Also, I've learned that sex doesn't always have to end in ejaculation (it's possible to experience near-orgasmic states without ejaculation - another new thing about being older for me).

To me now, sex is far more about "the journey" than the destination. I feel free to enjoy all the sensations, and to let whatever may come come. So to speak.

i thought this thread was for older women? is there something you want to come clean with Jeff?rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:39 PM CST
I picked the first one, up to five years difference, the last two men i have been serious with were 49 and 50 going younger than me and up to my age because i have figured out if they are fifty and never been married something is deffo odd with the picture you are looking at, that is just my opinion.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



morganlee
Qawra, Majjistral Malta
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:42 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
The thing about younger men and stamina is that while *potentially* younger men could probably maintain a harder erection for longer, in practice it's usually "wham, bam, thank you, ma'am," so I suspect that stamina is rarely an issue. I know that when I was younger it was all about "getting in" and the "getting it done." And as far as stamina...well, really, how long does a guy have to last to satisfy a lady? I mean, is 30 minutes long enough? An hour? Two hours? Aren't there are a variety of other factors - like touching, kissing, different strokes/positions - that add up to a good sexual experience? I know I experience sex now as a panoply of contact and movement - a good love-session being like a mutually created symphony of sensations.

I would say the main difference for between having sex now and in the past would be what I call the reliability of response: when you're in your twenties - thirties it's more or less automatic - it almost takes some countervailing force to prevent an erection. You don't have to worry much about being too tired or having eaten/drank too much - definite concerns for me if I want to be at my peak now. Another difference is the speed of achieving orgasm. In my twenties I could climax in 2 minutes flat - and more than occasionally did . I have no problem with maintaining an erection once underway, but it sometimes can take awhile before having an orgasm. Occasionally that can prove a little frustrating, but when it comes it often seems far more intense than orgasms I recall from my youth. Also, I've learned that sex doesn't always have to end in ejaculation (it's possible to experience near-orgasmic states without ejaculation - another new thing about being older for me).

To me now, sex is far more about "the journey" than the destination. I feel free to enjoy all the sensations, and to let whatever may come come. So to speak.
thumbs up some really good points
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
Ambrose2007
Badger, South Dakota USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:44 PM CST
irishlass45 wrote:
i thought this thread was for older women? is there something you want to come clean with Jeff?


More like **someone** I'd like to come clean with, Irish. blushing wink laugh
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
Ambrose2007
Badger, South Dakota USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:45 PM CST
morganlee wrote:
some really good points


Thanks, Morg!hug wave
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
Ambrose2007
Badger, South Dakota USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:46 PM CST
kissmedeeply wrote:
Well said ambrose


Appreciate that, Kissme. I'm glad you and Eric are so happy.hug handshake
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:48 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
More like **someone** I'd like to come clean with, Irish.

that is cool of you mr.J keep being yourself we like you for just who you are and just what you are made ofbouquet of flowers
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



prncss4someone
Hopeful, Michigan USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:49 PM CST
sex-yes

a long relationship-probably not.

I would want him to have a family etc....

but I also would want to give him some amazing memories while he is raising his familydevil
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Nova Scotia singles
Arlene101
Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia Canada
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:55 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
The thing about younger men and stamina is that while *potentially* younger men could probably maintain a harder erection for longer, in practice it's usually "wham, bam, thank you, ma'am," so I suspect that stamina is rarely an issue. I know that when I was younger it was all about "getting in" and the "getting it done." And as far as stamina...well, really, how long does a guy have to last to satisfy a lady? I mean, is 30 minutes long enough? An hour? Two hours? Aren't there are a variety of other factors - like touching, kissing, different strokes/positions - that add up to a good sexual experience? I know I experience sex now as a panoply of contact and movement - a good love-session being like a mutually created symphony of sensations.

I would say the main difference for between having sex now and in the past would be what I call the reliability of response: when you're in your twenties - thirties it's more or less automatic - it almost takes some countervailing force to prevent an erection. You don't have to worry much about being too tired or having eaten/drank too much - definite concerns for me if I want to be at my peak now. Another difference is the speed of achieving orgasm. In my twenties I could climax in 2 minutes flat - and more than occasionally did . I have no problem with maintaining an erection once underway, but it sometimes can take awhile before having an orgasm. Occasionally that can prove a little frustrating, but when it comes it often seems far more intense than orgasms I recall from my youth. Also, I've learned that sex doesn't always have to end in ejaculation (it's possible to experience near-orgasmic states without ejaculation - another new thing about being older for me).

To me now, sex is far more about "the journey" than the destination. I feel free to enjoy all the sensations, and to let whatever may come come. So to speak.
Wooo hooo-I can understand more -and as to the question from the OP -Yes I would as long as he is at least ten years older than my son and nowthumbs up and is smart enough to know all the little things that matter like Ambrose said.teddy bear
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
langleygirl
Langley, British Columbia Canada
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:57 PM CST
Not interested in younger men ....... because its also about having a relationship that goes beyond the bedroom that makes it special. To feel at ease and comfortable with another not just in body, but mind and spirit.

I think that its only something that happens over time as well - perhaps its learning about ourselves and our own bodies that changes our experiences - all I know for sure that its a difference experience for me now (when it happens day dream ) then when I was younger ............ and truly while a "younger male" may physically attract me - its also about personality and character.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Nova Scotia singles
Arlene101
Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia Canada
Posted: May 15, 2008, 5:58 PM CST
prncss4someone wrote:
sex-yes

a long relationship-probably not.

I would want him to have a family etc....

but I also would want to give him some amazing memories while he is raising his family
I like thatthumbs up day dream giggle
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
Ambrose2007
Badger, South Dakota USA
Posted: May 15, 2008, 6:00 PM CST
Arlene101 wrote:
Wooo hooo-I can understand more -and as to the question from the OP -Yes I would as long as he is at least ten years older than my son and now and is smart enough to know all the little things that matter like Ambrose said.


Hey, Arlene!wave cheers
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Nova Scotia singles
Arlene101
Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia Canada
Posted: May 15, 2008, 6:02 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
Hey, Arlene!
Hi Sweetiewave Missed seeing you and it is great to see you dressed up all the time.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Nova Scotia singles
Arlene101
Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia Canada
Posted: May 15, 2008, 6:04 PM CST
Ambrose2007 wrote:
Hey, Arlene!
teddy bear teddy bear were supposed to go with that.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: 1 2 3 4 of 4

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »