BnaturAl wrote:Ther are tons of people starving in this world and you and I were one of those, the origin of the food would be incidental. Generally its only people who have enough food that find moral issues. Though I would prefer the world fix the real reasons for food shortage I'd be remiss in throwing out the baby with the bath water, based on some red herring flags of peta members.
Its one thing to have a cause, quite another to be a cause.
KFC now KFS (kentucky fried synthetics )
I can be a bit backwards, so I will be. KFC stands for Kentucky fried chicken (not a big secret) the reason they use the anagram is because the original owner sold the buisness, but put in the contract that the new owners can not change how he did things or basicly harm the reputation of the original 'Kentucky fried chicken'operation. The new owners made changes so they are bound to the not slandering the original owner.
There are a lot of people starving, not just in obscure places. The refuges in Afgahanistan were send a lot of food and some of it was bad food that would have had to be trashed in the US but is a tax writeoff as a donation (but that is a whole nother thread).
In a survival situation a person will find a much broader perspective on what is eatable. I have no doubt about that. I have been threw wilderness survival training and have learned some odd things. The leather in your boots is eatable, the bark on a pine tree is eatable the thin layer underneath is also, it chews like gum and taste like gin. I'd go on but it can get gross unless you are realy f=ing hungry.
As of now this lab meat is not going to be given away to those that can not afford to buy it at high class food cost. ,,It is unfourtunate that a company can not proffit from selling food to the starving that have no money to buy food in the first place.
Dennis ( Trying to be somwhat opjective)