Thread:

No Green for now... Senate Votes NO!

Category:
Current Events, Politics

No Green for now... Senate Votes NO!

Posted: Jun 6, 2008, 10:37 AM CST
Friday, June 6, 2008
WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans on Friday blocked a global warming bill that would have required major reductions in greenhouse gases, after a bitter debate over its economic costs and whether it would substantially raise gasoline and other energy prices.

Democratic leaders fell a dozen votes short of getting the 60 needed to end a Republican filibuster on the measure and bring the bill up for a vote. The 48-36 vote failed to reach even a majority, a disappointment to the bill's supporters.

Majority Leader Harry Reid was expected to pull the legislation, in all likelihood pushing the congressional debate over climate change to next year with a new Congress and a new president.

The bill would have capped carbon dioxide coming from power plants, refineries and factories, with a target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 71 percent by mid-century.

"It's a huge tax increase," argued Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, a prominent coal-producing state. He maintained that the proposed system of allowing widespread trading of carbon emissions allowances would produce "the largest restructuring of the American economy since the New Deal."

Supporters of the bill accused Republicans of muddying the water with misinformation.

"There is no tax increase," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., one of the bill's chief sponsors said. She said the emissions trading system would provide tax relief to help people pay energy prices. And supporters disputed that it would substantially increase gasoline prices.

Four Democrats joined most Republicans in essentially killing the bill.

Both presidential candidates, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain, were absent, although supporters of the bill said they had sent letters advising they would have voted for the bill.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



BnaturAl
Sarnia, Ontario Canada
Posted: Jun 6, 2008, 10:39 AM CST
I wonder if 'they' have an exit strategy... hmmm
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
arabella
Somewhere In, Maine USA
Posted: Jun 6, 2008, 11:02 AM CST
HealthyLiving wrote:
Both presidential candidates, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain, were absent, although supporters of the bill said they had sent letters advising they would have voted for the bill.


"Would have" doesn't cut it with me.

I know that both of these men are on the campaign trail, but aren't they getting paid for being representatives of their constituents?

A job is a job...you show up.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Posted: Jun 6, 2008, 12:35 PM CST
arabella wrote:
"Would have" doesn't cut it with me.

I know that both of these men are on the campaign trail, but aren't they getting paid for being representatives of their constituents?

A job is a job...you show up.


thumbs up I'm with you on this one! I think they need to stick to their business while they are campaigning. Not fair to not vote. This was an important bill. Their 2 votes, with 4 more, could have broke the philibuster. Dumb asses! Neither one of them deserve to be our President!!! This is proof!

They are ALL and I mean the Senators, and House of Reps, etc, oil investors. They do not want us to go green cos they will loose money. They are greedy!!! And selfish!!!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »