Posted: Jul 10, 2008, 11:39 PM CST
Personally, I think its your basic liberal plot gone completely off the reservation. While the basic "stockings free" (typically with thong panties) look is great, the addition of a pair of stockings (or thigh highs) with a pair of good looking heels is beyond compare. The look of a well turned leg is a thing to behold and the stuff that many sweet dreams from my youth are made of
So, in considering the basics of the lost stockings sales, this should be considered in terms of the obvious drawback related to panty hose as opposed to stockings or thigh highs. what are the demographics on this issue. Are the wearers/non-wearers prone to one age group or widely spread (no pun intended)? Actually there is nothing more sexy than taking the estraordinary time required to assist a lady in removing her stockings/thigh highs and having her decide that the removing has takjen quite long enough thank you very much and demand that one dispense with it in summary fashion.
I would think that this is all in the eye orf the beholder as it were and all aspects of the question should be examined (delicately of course). It is beyound doubt that the consequence of which is sexier stockings or bare legs should be given the lengthy examination that they deserve.
I vote that we commit to establishing a committee to study the question more closely and report back on the issue.