mikeeemike: I respect your views and opinion on McCain versus Obama.
But what I still struggle with is the American paranioa that any person who has muslim ancestory, visited a country which has a predominately muslim religion, or expresses a view that is slightly favourable towards the religion etc, has to be suspected or implied to have a case to answer, including Obama. Why should any of these issues affect his presendency credentials?
I've been to Oman, Egypt, Dubai etc and the people and muslims from these countries are beautiful people, yet because of their religion are put in the same bucket as the terrorists from 9/11, Iraq, and Afganastan?
We've all heard the rumors about Obama and him being a Muslim. Those I believe are simply that - Rumors. I am not an Obama fan but I hate to see even him be unfairly characterized or blatantly lied about.
Frankly, if he were a Muslim it wouldn't make a difference to me. This would be true if I supported him and as is the case now, when I don't. The only thing that would concern me is if this rumor were more than a rumor. Then I would have to question why he would ever lie about such an issue. I don't believe that's the case and can only hope he wins or loses (Preferable loses) based on rational thought.
Unfortunately, given human nature evidenced by posts like the one earlier, race religeon, sex, etc... will continue to taint this election and other elections in the future. Phrases such as the white or black chuch, white, black, female, or Christian vote, etc.. have dominated the primaries and will continue to do so. Then there's the politically motivated, bullshit infested web sites, newspapers, etc... that propogate even more disinformation and finally we have people too lazy, biased or both to actually think for themselves. It's a wonder we've evolved even this far.