Thread:

how can the u.s.a tell iran to stop building nuclear weapons when they've got enough nuclear weapons

Category:
Current Events, Politics
page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 of 8

how can the u.s.a tell iran to stop building nuclear weapons when they've got enough nuclear weapons

England dating
trish123
Lancashire, Lancashire, England UK
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 6:58 PM CST
Hugz_n_Kissez wrote:
I know hun and I'm proud of you.....


Im still bewildered laugh teddy bear kiss bouquet of flowers
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Ontario personals
Hugz_n_Kissez
Someplace, Ontario Canada
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 6:59 PM CST
trish123 wrote:
Im still bewildered



Well you shouldn't be...You're smart cookie.....wink hug teddy bear hug bouquet of flowers comfort
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
ttom500
St. Cloud, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 7:06 PM CST
trish123 wrote:
No Tom, what m saying is simply taht people are being playead against each other - we are collective pawns in their game - oh why cant people see this


Trish......I don't know about you.....but I am not a collective pawn.
The work I do....I consider it valueable and worthwhile. You say that
GWB is playing people against eash other.....like telling people that WWIII was a near thing....and causing fear.....a few months ago?

Then last week the Isreali Air Force flies a little 120 plane sortie on a test run for Iran or elsewhere. And the world goes....oh my....they are
serious....they might just push the button and this WWIII is on.

The Isreali likely did not even give GWB 24 hours notice of the sortie, Trish. They just did it.

It is not a game, Trish. Real deal and real thing. People just don't want to face the fact that it is close at present. That was always one of the problem with the cold war, by the way. That the militaries would become complacent with such a long conflict of threats without the reality of combat.....that they would make misestimations.

Don't underestimate Pres. A or terrorists that are seeking nuc, Trish.
They will use them.

Trish...there are so many opinions, positions and words being expresses on this. I respect your position. And do really wish your professional opinion on Pres. A. I may come on hard....on this....because I have seen it from different perspective than yours.
But it does not mean I don't respect your position.

Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »



shipoker55
St. Petersburg, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 7:16 PM CST
ttom500 wrote:
How effective are the covert operations, Ship? The UN atomic energy agency.....gave a report about 3-4 weeks ago......on Iran's nuclear programs. Here is the short list:

1) constructed a underground nuclear test site
and
2) modified existing missiles to carry nucs
3) extending the range of their missiles

What does that say to you?

Ship, you know we are security agreement negotiations with Iraq presently. They get the ink dry on them.....you got your withdrawal.
To what troop level....I don't know.....but it will be one that they Iraqi can live with.

Also shows good faith and good intent.....when you stay the course and get the job done. We are nearest thing to a win, that we are going to get in Iraq. If we leave.....and a flood of foreign fighter come in? What then? Send them back? Will not happen. You might as well write Iraq off. again jmo



Iraq is not OURs to write off!!
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
ttom500
St. Cloud, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 7:29 PM CST
shipoker55 wrote:
Iraq is not OURs to write off!!



Then we stay and get the job done, Ship. Leave and we have no word in what happens there. Leave with a full withdrawal....they (being every anti American group and anti American country in the region) get the choice.

But you are 100% right...Iraq is not ours.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
SatelliteServer
somewhere, Ontario Canada
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 7:49 PM CST
whatever G-dub comes ups with I don't think I will understand
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Nevada personals
johndivr
Middle East, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 7:54 PM CST
shipoker55 wrote:
Iraq is not OURs to write off!!
WE DO HAVE ALL THOSE NUKES OF OURS SITTING AROUNG, GETTING DUSTY..............................
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Florida matchmaking
WhatUwish4
Jacksonville, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 8:04 PM CST
johndivr wrote:
WE DO HAVE ALL THOSE NUKES OF OURS SITTING AROUNG, GETTING DUSTY..............................



Welcome, John!
wave
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Indiana dating
Indyfella
indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 8:05 PM CST
johndivr wrote:
WE DO HAVE ALL THOSE NUKES OF OURS SITTING AROUNG, GETTING DUSTY..............................


You don't polish your nuke? confused
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
ttom500
St. Cloud, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 8:16 PM CST
johndivr wrote:
WE DO HAVE ALL THOSE NUKES OF OURS SITTING AROUNG, GETTING DUSTY..............................


I know John. Remember when the nuclear option was on the table for Afghanistan?

To go after the deep mountian base complexes with nucs? Well I shot the idea down with some papers. There were other ways to achieve the same without going nuclear.

We are trying to keep this conventional, John. You and Ship both know that. Also the moment we go nuclear, the world will be on us like flies to cow turds. The coming problem is Iran and its nuclear programs, not ours. We could have used them already......the world is not picking up on the restraint that has been shown here.

Washington doesnot want this to go WMD. But there is not much we can do about a Isreal that sees if differently. jmo
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Nevada personals
johndivr
Middle East, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 9:20 PM CST
ttom500 wrote:
I know John. Remember when the nuclear option was on the table for Afghanistan?

To go after the deep mountian base complexes with nucs? Well I shot the idea down with some papers. There were other ways to achieve the same without going nuclear.

We are trying to keep this conventional, John. You and Ship both know that. Also the moment we go nuclear, the world will be on us like flies to cow turds. The coming problem is Iran and its nuclear programs, not ours. We could have used them already......the world is not picking up on the restraint that has been shown here.

Washington doesnot want this to go WMD. But there is not much we can do about a Isreal that sees if differently. jmo

I KNOW BRO, I BEEN THERE TOO LONG...........BUT IT ALMOST SEEMS LIKE IF I WAS PRESIDENT THE BUTTON MIGHT LOOK LIKE A GOOD WAY TO GO SOMTIMES, BESIDES ZAP A BLANK SPOT IN IRAN, THEN ASK, NO TELL OPEC WE EXPECT TO PAY NO MORE THAN 20 CENTS A GALLON AGAIN, FOREVER, WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. WORLD OPINION BE DAMMED!
JR
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
free online dating
ttom500
St. Cloud, Florida USA
Posted: Jul 13, 2008, 7:00 AM CST
johndivr wrote:
I KNOW BRO, I BEEN THERE TOO LONG...........BUT IT ALMOST SEEMS LIKE IF I WAS PRESIDENT THE BUTTON MIGHT LOOK LIKE A GOOD WAY TO GO SOMTIMES, BESIDES ZAP A BLANK SPOT IN IRAN, THEN ASK, NO TELL OPEC WE EXPECT TO PAY NO MORE THAN 20 CENTS A GALLON AGAIN, FOREVER, WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. WORLD OPINION BE DAMMED!
JR


Hang in there, John. It is cooling in Iraq. We are working the lob bomb problem now. I have some ideas here, sending up the flag pole soon.

North Korea just agreed to totally dismantle its reactor by Oct. So pressure and diplomancy can work. But they would have never said that without a US military presence and military options on the table
against them.

Iran is more complicated than North Korea. Thier nuclear facilities are
more in number, some are buried, Iran has put more dollar into them, and still has tacid support from Russia.....for their having the programs. But nothing will happen without a military presence and military options on the table with Iran, in my opinion.

You cannot imagine the pressure to be energy independant here in the US now with the price hitting $4 per gal. Environmentalists are losing support because thier positions. As they do, Democrat representatives...can come around to approving the offshore and anwar drilling programs.

Even better than opec at .20 per gallon. Is US produced at .20 per gallon.:-) We will all be driving Caddies with 427 in them again.:-)

Be safe, John.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
England dating
gillyloves69
london, Outer London, England UK
Posted: Jul 13, 2008, 7:53 AM CST
diogenes wrote:
Iran couldn't blow up an inflatable goat sex toy.



wave

whats with thses blow up goat sex toys ? ..and do they come in black ?


rolling on the floor laughing laugh rolling on the floor laughing
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
Washington dating
lovestrees
Tacoma area, Washington USA
Posted: Jul 13, 2008, 9:31 AM CST
Hi Gilly! How's it going?

Only read page 8 of this one. Good that folks are openly discussing...

On deductive reasoning and restraint, you know that Isreal has atomic bombs, right? How do you know?

Does it not stand to reason that Iran already has some? Just as Isreal's powerful ally has handed them "the bomb" (which they wisely choose NOT to talk about)...

Does it not stand to reason that Iran's powerful ally has not ever trucked a few over the border?

What would happen to the flow of oil if someone blew off just one atomic and contaminated a very small sea-passage that half the world's oil is floated through?

This stuff is "brinkmanship". It is very real.
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
England dating
gillyloves69
london, Outer London, England UK
Posted: Jul 13, 2008, 9:34 AM CST
lovestrees wrote:
Hi Gilly! How's it going?

Only read page 8 of this one. Good that folks are openly discussing...

On deductive reasoning and restraint, you know that Isreal has atomic bombs, right? How do you know?

Does it not stand to reason that Iran already has some? Just as Isreal's powerful ally has handed them "the bomb" (which they wisely choose NOT to talk about)...

Does it not stand to reason that Iran's powerful ally has not ever trucked a few over the border?

What would happen to the flow of oil if someone blew off just one atomic and contaminated a very small sea-passage that half the world's oil is floated through?

This stuff is "brinkmanship". It is very real.



wave

hello buddy ..hows it going man ? just thought i'd wake you yanks up for a couple of days before getting back into my assignments again !


cheers
Is this post offensive? If so, Report this post »
page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 of 8

Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff does not know about forum abuse (and cannot do anything about it), unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »

If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »