Married People on a singles website

Forums Home » Dating & Relating » Married People on a singles website
Ambrose2007 Badger, South Dakota USA
lusciousmile: Oh boy!


Is that head-knocking aimed at the latter characterization (what I'd call a "faux separation"), or the whole subject in general, my dear Lush?wave confused bouquet of flowers
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
bodleing Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK
Me and my wife separated in 1980. Since then I have never
spent the night under the same roof as her, see her around
town occasionally and I do consider myself as single. although
my profile states separated.
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
Ambrose2007 Badger, South Dakota USA
laura225: not going to happen unless CS is checking our background and putting driver's licence pics in our profiles

married or singles - all would present themselves here as they wish/believe/see themselves
sorry! I am in the same boat as you, just realistic.


Rather depressing, my dear Laura. I was soooo looking forward being on a Black List. Would make me seem more soulful, I'm thinking.blushing sad flower
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
lusciousmile Espoo, Etela-Suomen Laani Finland
Ambrose2007: Is that head-knocking aimed at the latter characterization (what I'd call a "faux separation"), or the whole subject in general, my dear Lush?


The whole subject. I think i may be in some sort of 'situation'. No, not with you. laugh


sad flower
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
arabella Temple, Maine USA
Ambrose2007: I have met a few people like that, Joanie.

Seriously, I'd consider a separation where the parties involved are living in different residences leading clearly separate lives - that is, they don't socialize and they maintain, at most, some basic phone connections where necessary matters (such as financial or children) are discussed. That strikes me as a legitimate form of separation. A separation where the parties continue to see each other socially and discuss the minutiae of their lives is far more dubious, and should constitute a clear warning sign to anyone seeking a romantic relationship with either of them.


AND, some folks don't want to spend the money to file for a legal separation. They want to save their pennies to file for a divorce.

I was separated for a year before I was divorced. I lived alone but still had contact with my husband because his shop was in my barn and he was building a new facility at his house where his shop would be located.

So separations come in all shapes and forms.



------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
lusciousmile Espoo, Etela-Suomen Laani Finland
bodleing: Me and my wife separated in 1980. Since then I have never
spent the night under the same roof as her, see her around
town occasionally and I do consider myself as single. although
my profile states separated.


You two aren't friends?

wave
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
bodleing Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK
lusciousmile: You two aren't friends?


Not really, but not enemies either,

more like strangerslaugh
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
laura225 Somewhere, New York USA
Ambrose2007: Rather depressing, my dear Laura. I was soooo looking forward being on a Black List. Would make me seem more soulful, I'm thinking.


wave

ah, Jeff, you still worry blushing how it would make you look? wow!

hmmm day dream wonder if it's going to be mandatory to post driver's licence pics for a Black-List folks giggle


....or it's gonna be mug shots? cool


cheers
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
Ambrose2007 Badger, South Dakota USA
kamelia: So tell me you have more experience in this than I do

When my marriage fell apart, I felt the need to get the divorce finalized as soon as possible. My question is why wait? Unless you are unsure if you want out..


That last is certainly a premier possibility, I'll grant you that - especially if the two "separated" individuals are living under the same roof or are otherwise still very much involved in each other's lives.

But for every general truth there are notable exceptions. First, it's quite possible that no romantic connection exists though the two parties are still friends. They may be still separate because in some countries (or states) a year (or more?) is required before a divorce is legal. They may not have divorced because they are intimidated by the expense or hassle involved. They may have zero interest in reconciling, but are nonetheless reluctant to admit such a failure in their lives. People are complex creatures, and there exist many possible motivations for any number of actions.

That being said, I would agree that the most likely answer remains that separated people who do not actively pursue a divorce have some doubts about getting that divorce. The likelihood of that increases, I think, in direct proportion to the degree of emotional/social connection that still obtains between them. If you are considering getting involved with a separated person, it is critical to assess whether or not that person's feelings toward his or her spouse have been satisfactorily resolved into mere friendship and/or indifference.

CAVEAT EMPTOR.


wink
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
lusciousmile Espoo, Etela-Suomen Laani Finland
bodleing: Not really, but not enemies either,

more like strangers


Then divorce her. sticking out tongue


laugh
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
arabella Temple, Maine USA
Ambrose2007: Rather depressing, my dear Laura. I was soooo looking forward being on a Black List. Would make me seem more soulful, I'm thinking.


What are you shooting for?

An "Anna Karenina" kind of soulfulness??? rolling on the floor laughing

And when did you get to be "Voluptuous" ????laugh

grin
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
Ambrose2007 Badger, South Dakota USA
laura225: ah, Jeff, you still worry how it would make you look?

wonder if it's going to be mandatory to post driver's licence pics for a Black-List folks ....or it's gonna be mug shots?


I look horrible in my mug shot. They wouldn't let me wear any of my wigs. blues sigh dunno sad flower
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
bodleing Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK
Ambrose2007: That last is certainly a premier possibility, I'll grant you that - especially if the two "separated" individuals are living under the same roof or are otherwise still very much involved in each other's lives.

But for every general truth there are notable exceptions. First, it's quite possible that no romantic connection exists though the two parties are still friends. They may be still separate because in some countries (or states) a year (or more?) is required before a divorce is legal. They may not have divorced because they are intimidated by the expense or hassle involved. They may have zero interest in reconciling, but are nonetheless reluctant to admit such a failure in their lives. People are complex creatures, and there exist many possible motivations for any number of actions.

That being said, I would agree that the most likely answer remains that separated people who do not actively pursue a divorce have some doubts about getting that divorce. The likelihood of that increases, I think, in direct proportion to the degree of emotional/social connection that still obtains between them. If you are considering getting involved with a separated person, it is critical to assess whether or not that person's feelings toward his or her spouse have been satisfactorily resolved into mere friendship and/or indifference.

CAVEAT EMPTOR.



Exactlythumbs up
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
lusciousmile Espoo, Etela-Suomen Laani Finland
Ambrose2007: That last is certainly a premier possibility, I'll grant you that - especially if the two "separated" individuals are living under the same roof or are otherwise still very much involved in each other's lives.

But for every general truth there are notable exceptions. First, it's quite possible that no romantic connection exists though the two parties are still friends. They may be still separate because in some countries (or states) a year (or more?) is required before a divorce is legal. They may not have divorced because they are intimidated by the expense or hassle involved. They may have zero interest in reconciling, but are nonetheless reluctant to admit such a failure in their lives. People are complex creatures, and there exist many possible motivations for any number of actions.

That being said, I would agree that the most likely answer remains that separated people who do not actively pursue a divorce have some doubts about getting that divorce. The likelihood of that increases, I think, in direct proportion to the degree of emotional/social connection that still obtains between them. If you are considering getting involved with a separated person, it is critical to assess whether or not that person's feelings toward his or her spouse have been satisfactorily resolved into mere friendship and/or indifference.
CAVEAT EMPTOR.



Hard to do that, i think.

I think i'm already having a headache. sigh

You are a smart man. hug
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
bodleing Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK
lusciousmile: Then divorce her.


Why?


dunno
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
Ambrose2007 Badger, South Dakota USA
lusciousmile: The whole subject. I think i may be in some sort of 'situation'. No, not with you.


Couldn't you have let me down more gently, Lush??moping sigh wink
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
lusciousmile Espoo, Etela-Suomen Laani Finland
bodleing: Why?


Why not?


dunno
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
laura225 Somewhere, New York USA
snooty oh, he IS!!


didn't you see his bath-tub shot laugh hole
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
Ambrose2007 Badger, South Dakota USA
arabella: What are you shooting for?

An "Anna Karenina" kind of soulfulness???

And when did you get to be "Voluptuous" ????


I was thinking more a Barry White kind of soulfulness, J.

"Voluptuous" is for me more a state of mind.blushing
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------
bodleing Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK
lusciousmile: Why not?


Last time I looked it would cost me £1200,

so there's 1200 good reasons.laugh
------ locked THIS THREAD IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT ALLOW REPLIES locked ------




Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »



If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »