Connecting Singles^® Forums 100% Free Online Dating

Wanta play Hijackers with Gozo and me, Jerry?

And, yes, he did.

why not, how's you're sex life?

Alone.

coool...but I ain't telling.....

Dana, can I play too? Looks like fun!

Ahhh maybe your sex life isn't as lonely as mine.

Join in, Merky! The more the merrier!

I confirm!! it will be you who will start the 3rd ww. It is people like you and your attitude that has made America an object of dislike (if not hate) all around the world. They say a nation gets the president it deserves....so there is your answer

we have country's,,, religions that have fought since the beginnings of religion,,how do you change that? Technology, and the need to try and police these different philosophys on life have made it a world epidemic,,scarey thought when so many of them are willing to sacrifice they're own lives to spread the religion they believe in.

Say whatever you want to say against the US (I know that was not your point but some people are super touchy especially when they hold fanatism in their blood, and to put it in Spanish words "más papista que el mismo maldito Papa") or just with a smell "against" the US and you will have a big in that guy. The remark about who has damaged the world the most (for example in green terms) is very representative of that repertoire. (For God sakes! most of the pollution from China is to support the consumerism invented and promoted in the US via freedom, democracy and al that crap) Well, I know that is not the point of the discussion. I think the consolation prize is a very funny idea of yours.
AS for your question I think it is unpredictable who can start the final war. In fact that is a very sensitive thing. They are all ready and certainly not chance to survive. A few years ago the US came up with this expensive and stupid idea of the Star War that was technically beyond realisation and the new generation of super-rapid Russian rockets made them save a few trillions of dollars and conclude that there was no chance to create a technology that can give them the advantage of the first devastating blow. It was a very US idea but it sucked in the end as all that kind of ideas eventually do.

We can choose to let a thread die, or wait until the Mods rip it out of the forums, taking a few rules violators with them...


Your choice people.

This "buddhist" always amazes me with his infinite patience. Very representative of the SG which I know a little bit too much.

Pack behaviour.
I am still looking for my own pack.

You've hit the Nail on the Head!

I like your contribution. That is the dilemma: revolt or die like a poor sheep waiting for its turn at the abbatoir. The dilemma has also created two kinds of humans: "are you revolting fucked up bastard?" I would be asked by a status-quo lover, yes, one of those that read books and analyse everything, of course everything within the limits of their selfishness. One of those whose characterization would only be of some use for those that really want to go to the limits of our civilization just to create soemthing new (if it is possible at all).
No more characterization of those two kinds of humans defined by their attitude toward life. It is true that I know many people that should belong to one side or the other without even noticing it and it is true that in both sides it is possible to find bigots and peaceful characters.
Anyway, it is not a big deal that mankind gets destroyed in the end. A relief for all the species and for the planet, if something remains.
The status quo overs, the gluttons for official truths will, in the meantime, enjoy -in the spirit of Godfried Leibnitz- the best possible world.
That is good too.