Is Marriage an Act of Desperation?

Forums Home » CS Lounge » Is Marriage an Act of Desperation?



JacobGrimm Blah blah, Ontario Canada
sassy49senior: Love is an act of tender forgiveness, a tender look which
becomes a habit. Very simple way of putting it
stated by Peter Ustinov.



thumbs up not a bad quote either, better to indulge this than jealousy or envy .. in an altruistic world?



Dusty45 Louisville, Kentucky USA
Acts of Love are infinite and indescribable.
Such as God.

One just 'knows' or has 'knowledge' when there is an
act of Love.

And, any type of interaction with another will show you
what the act of Love is because the knowledge is within you.

sassy49senior Itty Bitty, Nebraska USA
JacobGrimm: Must this last forever? (which is the notion of marriage). Setting aside moral codes, why would we preclude having that moment with someone that lasted for say just 20 minutes of our lives, based soley on the preconcieved notion that a 20 minute rapport is somehow 'not right' for us.





You have a very good thread going here. We must have to
engage our brain before coming up with answers.

For me it will only be with a long term committment. However,
that does not mean my partner is going to feel the same. My
first marriage lasted 36 years and had a lot of lows along
with magnificent highs, but we worked on all these things
and knew our love and the committment we made would keep us
together.
My 2nd marriage was too fast on our thinking process and only
lasted 2 years, which was devasting to me as I went into it
for a lifetime.
For many, I would assume, they would not mind that quick
intimate feeling for just a short time.
But not for me (JMO)
dcj22 Somewhere, Kansas USA
I've been on my own for way too long to want to get married just to be married. Frankly, the thought scares the hell out of me, yet a good marriage is something I would like to have in my life. Not so much that I would settle for the wrong person or marry just to be married. That would just end in divorce. And I've already been there and done that.

Monogamy is a choice. It's not always an easy one. But it's still a choice. What monogamy isn't is an act of desperation. It's an act of love and trust.



ButterflyDreams Wichita Falls, Texas USA
Okay, I just read a few responses that talk about God and sperm and left me going, what the heck??

So, I'm just replying to the original post...
I do agree that the desperate search for The One or a marriage partner is slightly ridiculous because of so many other people being overlooked in the process.

I personally think that, these days, it's so hard just to find quality people to be life long friends with. Real people you can depend on, without even bringing the complicated issue of 'soilmate' or 'love' into it. So, yes, I don't know what all that marriage stuff is all about when it's hard enough to just find a person that won't run away the moment things are creams puffs and rainbows. The divorce rate and lacking of even finding a quality person to talk to makes me strongly doubt the point of marriage.

As for you mentioning monogamy, monogamy and 'love'/'marriage' aren't the same thing. I don't exactly believe in love or marriage, but I do believe in monogamous 'relations' because I have a clean body and would like to keep it that way.

So, monogamous activity I support.
The marriage, love, soul mate stuff--that can be out on the back shelf until I'm done trying to just find decent people to stick around for good conversation.
dcj22 Somewhere, Kansas USA
buzzy: The role of male spearm is in direct conflict with the moral values of religion. Millions of spearm in your ejaculation has been designed to kill other male sperm. This design is a huge piece of evidence in support of evolution. This shows that at our very begging women had multiple partners. The male with the strogest sperm would have the greater chance of producing offspring. Therfore his family line will survive. We didn't start having problems with that issue until men decided to create laws to govern relationships between man and woman. Some of those laws are the opposite of the laws of nature. That is why there is so much infidelity. The laws of man say you must have only one partner, the laws of nature is telling you to reproduce with many to increase the chance your family line will continue. Some people can have just one partner. Others struggle with that concept inside themselves. Now, if you believe God made all things, then you have to admit God created a force so powerful that man cannot control. The power of reproduction. Did "God" make a mistake then? Or is evolution true? Or did "God" use the process of evolution to create life?
If the latter is true, then our struggle with multible partners is another design flaw by the creator.



Not everyone struggles with multiple partners.
gozoman2 Xaghra, Gozo Malta
Very truthfully.....

I simply do not believe in marriage.

wine
dcj22 Somewhere, Kansas USA
gozoman2: Very truthfully.....

I simply do not believe in marriage.



But do you believe in monogamy, Gozo?



Dusty45 Louisville, Kentucky USA
I would say in the world of the egoic Mind, anything goes.
The ego would define love to suit any interpretation that
would help ego to survive.




Dusty45 Louisville, Kentucky USA
Dusty45: I would say in the world of the egoic Mind, anything goes.
The ego would define love to suit any interpretation that
would help ego to survive.


or 'acts of pseudo love'.
gozoman2 Xaghra, Gozo Malta
dcj22: But do you believe in monogamy, Gozo?


Yes.

I believe in a partnership.

And if I am in one, then I am faithful to that partner.

What would I be doing there if not?

And...expect the same.....



bouquet



JacobGrimm Blah blah, Ontario Canada
sassy49senior: You have a very good thread going here. We must have to
engage our brain before coming up with answers.


thumbs up my point was to set aside reconcieved notions and behaviors that we are 'accustomed to' in order to truely answer the question.
In response to:
For me it will only be with a long term committment. However,
that does not mean my partner is going to feel the same. My
first marriage lasted 36 years and had a lot of lows along
with magnificent highs, but we worked on all these things
and knew our love and the committment we made would keep us
together.
My 2nd marriage was too fast on our thinking process and only
lasted 2 years, which was devasting to me as I went into it
for a lifetime.
For many, I would assume, they would not mind that quick
intimate feeling for just a short time.
But not for me (JMO)


But is this because of the preconcieved notions do you think? Is what has been engrained in society as moral, the reason you feel this way?
dcj22 Somewhere, Kansas USA
gozoman2: Yes.

I believe in a partnership.

And if I am in one, then I am faithful to that partner.

What would I be doing there if not?

And...expect the same.....



Ditto



JacobGrimm Blah blah, Ontario Canada
ButterflyDreams: Okay, I just read a few responses that talk about God and sperm and left me going, what the heck??

So, I'm just replying to the original post...


yay

In response to:
I do agree that the desperate search for The One or a marriage partner is slightly ridiculous because of so many other people being overlooked in the process.

I personally think that, these days, it's so hard just to find quality people to be life long friends with. Real people you can depend on, without even bringing the complicated issue of 'soilmate' or 'love' into it. So, yes, I don't know what all that marriage stuff is all about when it's hard enough to just find a person that won't run away the moment things are creams puffs and rainbows. The divorce rate and lacking of even finding a quality person to talk to makes me strongly doubt the point of marriage.


It doesn't seem functional anymore does it, at least not for most people.

In response to:
As for you mentioning monogamy, monogamy and 'love'/'marriage' aren't the same thing. I don't exactly believe in love or marriage, but I do believe in monogamous 'relations' because I have a clean body and would like to keep it that way.

So, monogamous activity I support.
The marriage, love, soul mate stuff--that can be out on the back shelf until I'm done trying to just find decent people to stick around for good conversation.


comfort monogamus, for me sort of means marriage, committment to one single person intimately. However, thew question is, how healthy is this for our own growth, when 'lasting' has become such an dominant issue.



JacobGrimm Blah blah, Ontario Canada
dcj22: I've been on my own for way too long to want to get married just to be married. Frankly, the thought scares the hell out of me, yet a good marriage is something I would like to have in my life. Not so much that I would settle for the wrong person or marry just to be married. That would just end in divorce. And I've already been there and done that.

Monogamy is a choice. It's not always an easy one. But it's still a choice. What monogamy isn't is an act of desperation. It's an act of love and trust.


You really seem to be sitting on the fence DC. Is it really an act of love? or an act of respect for the others feelings and or a choice welcomed by us to avoid the tension that results from having not been monogamus while 'partnered'? the guilt, the other's anger, etc.

I was more questioning the whole moral code of not partnering based on wanting it to be 'forever' as opposed to experiencing singular 'moments' of partnering that may offer more than soulmate searching could. These of course can happen with one single person but if life presents opportunity for more moments, why does 'the code' take precidence?

hmmm



ButterflyDreams Wichita Falls, Texas USA
I agree the 'lasting' thing is an issue.

I don't agree that just because you're with one person intimately, it hinders your growth; and so you shouldn't be monogamous.
I believe if you're in healthy intimate relationship with one where the intimacy is good and satisfying, then you don't have to spend any extra effort on trying to find someone else to satisfy you intimately; you can use that effort to 'grow' or concentrate on other things in your life since that part is being fulfilled.

Ah, what an amazing run-on sentence.

=)



JacobGrimm Blah blah, Ontario Canada
ButterflyDreams: I agree the 'lasting' thing is an issue.

I don't agree that just because you're with one person intimately, it hinders your growth; and so you shouldn't be monogamous.
I believe if you're in healthy intimate relationship with one where the intimacy is good and satisfying, then you don't have to spend any extra effort on trying to find someone else to satisfy you intimately; you can use that effort to 'grow' or concentrate on other things in your life since that part is being fulfilled.

Ah, what an amazing run-on sentence.

=)


thumbs up I can't disagree. How many of us really get that though, the one where satisfying is ongoing within the monogamy.

One needs to work on relationships, for sure. Does the need to experience that thought or notion of a long satifying relationship, outweigh the satisfying nature of more singular moments that may not last and are not based in that preconcieved notion of monogamous and forever.



Dusty45 Louisville, Kentucky USA
If you continue to learn from and find good value in the
monogamous relationship or 'marriage' or something
other than that, then Love or acts of Love are involved.

Could be if the marriage is long lasting the act of Love
would be

tolerance.







JacobGrimm Blah blah, Ontario Canada
Dusty45: If you continue to learn from and find good value in the
monogamous relationship or 'marriage' or something
other than that, then Love or acts of Love are involved.

Could be if the marriage is long lasting the act of Love
would be

tolerance.


In any altruistic sense, which is usually were you are coming from dusty .. your words also apply to 'short' relationships.

Altruism is relatively unattainable, because of and to use your own word ..'ego' .. so the realm of altuism isn't in question. Maybe some day in the distant future? For now the question is preconcieved notions and behaviors and how they affect us for good or bad..



Dusty45 Louisville, Kentucky USA
JacobGrimm: In any altruistic sense, which is usually were you are coming from dusty .. your words also apply to 'short' relationships.

Altruism is relatively unattainable, because of and to use your own word ..'ego' .. so the realm of altuism isn't in question. Maybe some day in the distant future? For now the question is preconcieved notions and behaviors and how they affect us for good or bad..


But, if you keep your belief system this way, short of
being altruistic, the shift will never happen.





Report this thread if it breaks rules, is offensive, or contains fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. If this thread is offensive, please click here to report it »



If site dates and times do not show correctly, you can fix this by editing your timezone
Click here to edit your timezone »