Connecting Singles^® Forums 100% Free Online Dating

Then, the only person who looks stable is POP!
Com on Sommer, because life isn't just beautiful, we do have reactions to negative things, that doesn't mean you are unstable. It's like you are demanding 100% stability to qualify a person as stable. Stability is about being able to sort your emotions in an easy way even if it take tears...which is normal.
I will not walk outside my door and believe i'm unstable because i really know the meaning of such word. I may pass through difficult moments, which help me to celebrate the great moments, but that doesn't make me ustable.
In my case, i love challenges, nothing like radical sports but i do try to do what i feel like not carring much what it takes to achieve, i always think that i can set an appointment with the queen if that will be necessary and i may call the press if she denies to attend me. Things like that.
I come from a place where a smile is a smile, there is no doubt about when a smile is a smile. So honey, existencial problems don't make me more charming at all.
Did i sound unstable now?

now you disappoint me...

Any designer designs something for optimal/safest operational level. Whether it is a car or robot or a human...the "principles" remain the same. It's a law of nature copied by science.

i forgot, stick to the forum subject!!!! am i emotionally stable, no!!! im not, why!!! cause we are on a dating site trying to find a match, and who's best in emotions, (Females are). So who can fix emotions, only females can.

if there was another way, i would of found it.... but im am not, mentally unstable, or have a split personally, or anything esle....

Precisely, after trying a bit of this and that, you might get your taste right...

I never said you were unstable Cris.

No, it is not like that, Cris, I do not demand anything, certainly not 100% stability, because I know that is ridiculous to even think about. Who is? Nobody.

You seem to be defending yourself, for no reason, and I happen to agree with you. There are many areas of life that are negative, we live in an unstable world, it is up to us to balance it as best we can. I do not describe my self as stable all the time, but I have a degree of stability that keeps me on the straight and narrow of what we call life. I have no hang ups, about me, I am content with my lot, my home, my children and I yearn for nothing more than to be able to sleep at night and face the day with some drive and happiness, it has taken me many years to get there, but a journey that I would do all over again, just to remind myself of what I have now, that I was struggling to appreciate before.

My point in all of this, is this, that we are all not stable, not to advocate stability, but to see what people's thoughts are. The mind is a fragile thing and what one person sees as a challenge could be damaging and disturbing for another, one size does not fit all.

Well disappointed you shall remain. Coz that is crap.

yes i agree...for some it's a good thing and it works for them. And i never claimed to be fully imune against it...i'm just at a level where most people are not...and i resolve all my issues myself...and it works for me and i'm content with that. I'm not closed for new viewpoints too resolve issues...and i'm not saying this outa arrrogance...

Ah, good old arrogance. Many people misunderstand that. They confuse stability with arrogance, because a stable person, on the whole, can come across as arrogant in a very unstable world.

You show your side which many people think is arrogant, I know you are nothing other than a teddy bear.

well what can i say...maybe when your 80 one day you'll be more open minded towards this concept...

No, i'm not defending myself, what i don't agree is that everyone has to admit they are unstable. You do feel unstable at times? Of course, that's human dear, that's what i'm talking about. But could we define the boundary? That's what you seem not admitting that it's possible to do. Can we separate the stable from unstable? What i understood from your last post you don't believe we can because the world is unstable. I don't agree.

We are doing just fine!

Speak for yourself!

Well! excuse me!

I don't like the way things are!

Well tell us!

You get to use the body all the time!

This is not the place for this....we will talk in
a minute!

Ok!

We are through now!

And you do not have to agree at all. This is what a discussion is all about, is it not. And no, I am not saying that I want people to admit that they are unstable, I am asking for what people's thoughts are. There is a difference. If we want to define the boundary, then lets, I like discussions, not everybody agreeing, because we are all different, so we are not going to agree. And allow me to clarify my last post, I am not not admitting anything, I am simply writing my thoughts down in a discussion, the world is an unstable place, do you not think? I can admit that I can be unstable at times, but that as you have pointed out, does not make a person unstable, it makes them human.

Can we separate the stable from the unstable? It depends does it not on how we define unstable. My mother has been unstable emotionally all her life, as long as I can remember, and that has remained, because of trauma that happened to her, I would say that she is very emotionally traumatised and in turn that makes her unstable.

And I am at a loss, as to why you think that I want everyone to admit that they are unstable, but then I never claim not to anything other than confusing sometimes.

Well, RNG, whatever floats your boat.

Does less stable mean unstable or still stable, but just less...

Well, when I am 80, I will let you know. And I may have worked out then, how to have a discussion without people thinking that it is directed at them.

The important thing is that we are agreeing to desagree. Me explaining what you are asking will turn our positions into their own circles, so i believe it's not necessary, if you think it really is, then i'll get back to you later. I need to leave now.
I agree Sommer.
See you later

Oh, only now i found out that this is a philosophical thread, i'm outta here

We'll have to wait and see if CS still exist by then...
And as for people who think a comment is directed personally at them...too bad...i'm way past that point as its too time consuming to address at times, rather give "valuable" input into threads, if they view it a valuable at all i might add