romanticman4u: Apparently when I said he made 25,000 and had all insurances did kind of a fly by for you, lets say for aurguement this man did make what I said , this does not make him fiscally irresponcable, he has a job hes paying his bills , the only thing about him is he wasn't born with a sliver spoon in his mouth, a couple can be happy without being rich as this post has proven.
I know as well as the next person that a relationship can work without money and I was stating my corner, my view.
And your penultimate comment is simliar to what I stated.
As for being born with a silver spoon in one's mouth, I would not know, not having been born with one, nor been with anybody that has, my point, being that I cannot chose between love and money in the way that you ask.
If a person has nothing, then they can still be responsible.
I think you are missing my point, while I am getting yours.
Being hard up is not shameful, or bad, we all have had hard times, I am sure, but neither does a person having money make them bad at relationships.
And when you say born with a silver spoon, you are talking aristocracy, there are plenty of solvent people out there, who do not earn much, being solvent is being financially responsible, not rich.
I earn a reasonable amount, enough to live off and support my children, I would support a man that I loved, who fell on hard times. Of course I would. That is what being a partner is all about.
But I would not get involved with some lazy git, who expected me to pay for his expenses, when he is capable of working, nor would I be attracted to a person who was irresponsible with money.
I think this is the third time I have said this now.