LusciousLibra: I'd have no objection to mine being in a database that is secure.
Obviously the ppl who will aagrue against it would be the criminal types. Their reason for arguing against is because they'd get caught, or be linked to particular crimes.
DNA is not infallible though... think of Chimera Syndrome.
I'm not the criminal type and frankly I find your post offensive just to assume that people who don't share your point of view are criminals.
Just how is this information to be used and who is it going to be shared with, the FBI or MI5 perhaps? The world is in a state of unrest at the moment and things which are legal today such as peaceful protest could be illegal tomorrow. Or if we end up in a facist state and they start rounding up the ethnic minorities again, well the list would be ready and waiting.Just when would you decide to step outside the law. I remember the Poll Tax riots and the Miner's strike in the UK not that long ago and people criminalised for standing up for their rights.And we had British SAS soldiers dressen in police uniforms.
Or what if they decide to go for neclear power stations here (and I garuantee you they will within 10 years) and people strongly didagree with it? Then there's the whole Corrib Gas pipeline carry on.
Rememeber the state this country is in just now. We are ripe for a Maggie Thatcher character.
And if you think all policemen are honest and reasonable all the time, think again. The Garda have been caught before falsifying evidence.Think of Donegal and the man who served time for murder.
I consider this idea of holding files on people very similar to the old East German stasi meathods. It's yet another erosion of our civil rights and our freedom.
And as usual, they will try to convince us that it's for our own good.