Connecting Singles^® UK Forums100% Free Online Dating

Blair has already run his power in office-Bush has but a few months to go-How would you describe their legacy?.

i liked blair in the beginning,but think he has done damage in this country that is longstanding and gordon brown has been blamed for some of it unfairly.i wouldnt like to put what i think of bush,on this site.

The pair of them are like thrush... A pair of irritating C***s..

how i agree,totally corrupt,yet preaching morals to others,makes you sick

if cherie blair had been running the country, we wouldnt be in the mess we are in today. blair and bush...the names ,laurel and hardy, spring to mind!

romy you are so funny and i believe all politicians are corrupt and only out for themselves, they have to be liars and cheats to survive

Their legacy is the continuing situation in Iraq; another war that can't be won. Hey, did anyone find those pesky weapons of mass destruction anyway? They were why we piled into the country in the first place. They must be really well-hidden.

Total UK Government spending 1996: £309 billion

Total UK Governement spending 2007: £589 billion

Hi Cap'n SB

I disagree - Cee U Next Tuesdays are useful unless corrupted

FWIW
My late wife hated both - AS I do - She thought B Liar was just that and Brown has a nasty sneer on his face permanently you instantly want to insult or even kick and as for Cherie - Unprintable.

She stood in South Thanet as prospective candidate when that Corrupt arrogant tory parasite Johnathan Aitken was our local MP and lost and after later events I say thank Christ she lost.

She was obviously as common as muck, and not a good choice then, because when we heard her speaking in Broadstairs it showed and people just walked away - Even Labour voters. Friends of mine in the local Labour movement and I was a member of two trades unions then too were horified and embarrased as she was foisted on the local party by Central office with NO discussion at all !! Blair acted the same after that and so did Brown at the treasury. Like fascist dictators - but in earlier times they were neo-Stalinsts anyway so it was on the cards they would do the Big Brother crap if they ever got power and we now see it.

*Not a lot of people Know that* as Sir Michael,Caine was alleged to have said

When she was referred to as the FIRST LADY - That made my blood curdle because it stinks of Americanism - The Queen is OUR first lady and that was an insult to her and Blairs arse licking to that bloody illiterate Cowboy Bush and getting us involved in the American paranoia and illegal war is unforgiveable.

Rant over
Nuff said from me

2 all
Mike

oh dear you angry men are starting again,where is trish to sort you all out

they are no more dishonest than politicians in the mediterranean countries

Thats no recommendation when they have so many links to the mafia and the Catholic Church coUntries DEMONSTRATING WITH NO EXCEPTION the epitomy of extremes of wealth and poverty.

I will agree to differ with you - There are very few if any *politicians* left anywhere in the world NOW who are not corrupt, but it is so noticeable that the most high profile ones in the media hype machine (propaganda) are from Africa, Europe, Asia and South America.

Our lot only REALLY got started under Thatcher and the Tories on all sides.

I don't think M'Lud and I are being fooled by any of them at our ages.
He is 12 years younger so m'lud is a relative *sprog*

2 all anyway

unohoo @ BROADSTAIRS - PLANET THANET

Ello Mike-Sprog here!-well,i cant dispute that-can i???.

A lot of the obvious has been mentioned here-but(and is only my opinion)there is another factor to be considered in the aspect of the Bush /Blair legacy-especially from Blair!.

New Labour was what Blair was promoting(along with his minions)-'A change from the Past!'-well,he certainly done that-but forgot to consult the people first?.He,along with his minions succeeded in turning this country into into a politically correct quagmire by introducing 'restrictions' into our traditional phraseology of what is right and wrong to say?-He has manipulated,what was,a perfectly good educational system into a-'You Cant Fail'process-even introducing a few new qualifications where you aren't even required to spell your name right?-Enforced the 'One law for them and another for us'scenario-But above all he has to be known for the Millions of taxpayers money he has spent on "SPIN"-yes!-Word Doctors and PR-not to just defend his actions-but his image as well!!!!.

Some 25-30yrs ago a politician(Roy Hattersley)was interviewed outside the House of Commons after a vote on restoring Capital Punishment-the question was put to him-"It is well known that the majority of your constituents are in favour of the return of Capital Punishment-Why did you NOT represent their views?"-the answer was-"THEY ARE WRONG!"-"They elected me as their MP therefore they shall abide by what I decide!".

The above issue is foregone-but the attitude seems somewhat familiar?-besides being inclusive to the Blair we have known-lets not forget all the BLATENT LIES this man has told in order to pursue "What he knows is best to do"-in conjunction with his counterpart in America-Together they have totally ignored world opinion and created a situation which had no 'Afterplan'and is going to last for generations to come?-this is,of course,justified by ongoing manufactured reasons for which i believe we are on number 4 at the moment!.

Bush takes a different stance being:-"God told me to do it!".

In my opinion i sincerely hope History(being their Judge)-records the pair of them for what they are?????.

Ho Ho M'lud Sprog,

You have about summed up for the prostitution there admirably


but I think you forgot something -

1. The bastard is a bloody barrister ALLEGEDLY and

2. So is his loud mouth ill mannered spouse = legal parasite dependent on other peoples misery for an overinflated theft (wage)

3. Whats even worse, she refused to curtsy to HMQ when he got in and beceme PM and that WAS unforgiveble in my book and many others I know.

4. B Liar esquire was always in it only for himself and as then, is now, looking for the Nobel prize -

Therefore I suggest M lud that the people v ia the judiciary be allowed to ask HMQ to legally present one unique prize to both on behalf of the folk of the UK

B liar esquire and Bush the thick = Pricks of the century.
They and their cronies never fooled me.




Mike

The Empty Barrels making Noise again!

conrad you are always a gent