Posted: Jun 2, 2008, 10:26 AM CST
Sungod wrote:No its not you have gotten me very wrong, have any of my other posts tried to do that, why would i start now!!
I was reacting to some surprising mail and just asking a question.
Anyway what is wrong with sexual innuendo, this is a dating site for gods sake.
In relation to my Intimate encounter - not sexual intimate
I chose this because it was the only choice that seemed remotely romantic -
short term
longterm
sounds like airport parking, very unromantic or interesting.
I like the sound of an intimate encounter - it does not exactly specify time, but it could be forever and it should be intimate, how intimate its going to be it did not specify.
I have had alot of life experience not all good i am afraid, same as everybody but now at the bold age of 36 soon to be 37 I have decided that I am going to live my life and really make the most of it.
I love debate too and as a toastmaster, check it out toastmasters international, i do believe its important to keep things interesting.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with stimulating debate.......and, I have to admit it, I find you rather 'stimulating'! (~nudge~ ~nudge~ ~wink~ ~wink~)
To tell the truth I am a little upset that a former lover has described myself as being a bit of a 'Don Juan' - my own morality despises my uncharacteristic behaviour of late even though it has been 'stimulating' in more ways than one!