Do you agree with Vigalante justice? ( Archived) (53)

Although I may be jumping the gun, if the economy gets worse and the welfare state goes bankrupt then the rich will lose their riot insurance and prevention.

If this happens then the bourgeoisie will soon drop their liberal, posturing front and maybe, just maybe, we will have a law enforcement that works and not one crafted to appease the conscience of effete SWPL librarians and social workers. We don't need a police force that acts like a liberal-pacifist activity and sports club.

We need a police force headed by the common man. Like this working class orphan who smashed the Sicilian mafia;

Of course the problem with vigilante justice is how do you know if a person is really guilty? We see people perjure themselves and lie on the witness stand just to get an outcome that favors them and there have been cases where police have actually planted evidence to see someone convicted because they believe they are guilty or cause they may have gotten away with less serious crimes in the past. So vigilante justice might work 9/10 times but that 1 time you get an innocent victim who would unfairly be punished for a crime they did not commit.

You really think the people on here reflect people in general? What goes against the grain on here is not what goes against the grain on a council estate let me assure you of that.

Proles don't really talk about issues, and even when they do, they do not do so online. So I'm asking you to be aware that CS is naturally SWPL, shut-in, enclaver or nerd centric, and to not extrapolate from here a general consensus of the populaton total because you would be bang wrong in doing so.

And for the record, I like that you talk about and analyse things - it's one of the things I like about you despite growing up in a world made dark and sinister because of people who think just like you do - but it's the conclusions you draw from the analysis where you make the mistake. And this touches upon why people don't like Marxists and Liberals - because you always lose. If you were so smart and so educated then why do you lose so goddamn always?

Being one of Thatcher's lower middle class may explain your social attitudes. There are quite a few of those former working class types who through guilt or whatever espouse this leftoidian worldview as a form of, to borrow from Maddog, misplaced empathy. A way for the nouveau bourgeoisie to believe that you still stand for the poor and the beaten down.

I'm assuming you're telling me the truth here, and if so then you must know that your extreme emphasis on individualism, your liberalism and political correctness is enclaver through and through and is completely at odds with the sense of community, sameness and social conservatism of the proles? If you ever came from the poor, then you must know that the poor think and act nothing like social workers and hipsters.

I would suspect so. I also think that because Jac is intelligent she likes to be intelligent in her own unique way, meaning that she has the ideology of the intellectual playground and not one that accords with the mundane facts of reality.

It's true, the Left in this country, in the US and elsewhere is riddled with Marxistic enclavers who think just like you Jac.

And the old trade unionists of industry who didn't make it off the council estate, where can they be found today? In UKIP. The Libertarian party the bourgeoise Left despises. And do you know why Nigel Farage is popular amongst the proles? Because of telling people what they need and what they think, he asks them.

And Hipster always laugh when they come across earthy types who tell them what they don't want to hear. Which is why libtards populate the recesses of the internet and steer clear of the street, because on the spergy interweb forum the hipster usually wins, but on the street the Hipster dies.

I assure you Jac, if you were male and talked like you did in a working class boozer, they would stamp on your skull.

lawyers voted no,they need the business.

Poll: Do you agree with Vigalante justice?

Only when it's appropriate.

JEDBURGH JUSTICE,then a little Bloodfeuding after?

No they aren't.
And many times the police are actually corrupt and in league with organized crime, so there is no justice to be had from the courts in such cases. So sometimes vigilante justice is the only kind of justice available.

Whenever outlaws own the government (a very common situation) vigilante justice is certainly appropriate.