TheRedSquirrel87Manchester, Greater Manchester, England UK1,107 posts
TheRedSquirrel87: Socialism? Where? I see no cooperative ownership of the means of production. I'm not even quite sure where Bernie stands on nationalisation.
As far as I'm he wants to increase maternalism/welfare which formerly was a social safety net for big capitalism as much as anyone else. Not only in the direct sense by bailing out the banks, but it is what prevented the poor from hanging the rich in a society of widespread and increasing inequality. That's what makes me laugh about the stereotypical American right and it's complete absence of a plan for the poor. It's almost as if they've forgotten that welfarism was a measure designed to prevent socialism.
I will admit that Bernie Sanders is the closest candidate you have to socialism - next to Donald Trump! Them pair have the most socialism in their program.
In the whole the rest of the candidates support a mish-mash of welfare, gender-bending, ethnic fracture and wage depression. A middle class cosmopolitan and anti-worker political stance which more accurately befits the term "liberal". That's why the left wing doesn't have anybody working class in it.
Fast forward to the present, I left AT&T to go to college after two years preferring the direct route to a degree as opposed to night school. Since then, I have worked for small and large companies, as well as non-profits. I have owned a company and I have been to Washington on several occasions to pitch non-profit interests to congress. I have met with them one-on-one in the course of our business and have seen first-hand the power of public and private partnerships. I have also seen first-hand the dangers of an inept government assuming more and more control of the businesses which have always been the engine of our economy.
And what do we have to show for their intervention. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Nothing but staggering debt, cultural division, a decimated middle class and a rising lower class. The solution is not more government, but less,
I can see why both men are popular. They're eating up the "have not" vote whilst the rest of politics argues between the sub-elite and the elite in a war between the haves and the have yachts.
I can see why both men are popular. They're eating up the "have not" vote whilst the rest of politics argues between the sub-elite and the elite in a war between the haves and the have yachts.
If I could I'd vote for either man over Hillary's orthodoxy.
It'll be amusing if a woman takes the most powerful job in the world and does nothing with it. It still begs the question of what American women have become? British women had Margaret Thatcher(although few women relish in that), she disembowled the nation and equipped Red China, but at least she did something.
WhatUwish4: Yes, Purr, really. You don't seem to understand so I'll try again. THERE CAN ONLE BE ONE NOMINEE (and it's likely going to be Hillary). At that point, Sanders is GONE, and so are all these poll predictions you are copying and pasting. Now, should he happen to win the nomination, you still are not taking into account how many Hillary voters, how many registered democrats who vote republican, and how many independents will vote for Trump - so again, you poll is worthless.
In fact, other polling suggest that Trump is already winning in these non-polled areas: According to new data by Civis Analytics, those who identify as Republicans but are actually registered as Democrats support Trump at a HIGHER rate than registered Republicans, and they are also more likely to turn out to vote.
oh, but i do understand and the polls i listed are not worthless as they speak for themselves.
Registered Democrats make up just 8 percent of self-identified Republicans.
the other side of the equation that you so conveniently forgot to mention is all the registered republicans that are one of Mr. Trump's weakest groups.
Another turnout challenge for Mr. Trump is that he commands the support of many people who are unlikely to vote. Civis found him winning 40 percent of the vote among those it gave less than a 20 percent chance of participating in the general election — let alone in the primary. He held 29 percent among those who had greater than an 80 percent chance of voting in the November election.
Mr. Trump’s campaign will need to mobilize these less-likely voters to maximize his strength. But the challenge shouldn’t be overstated, either. Registered Democrats make up just 8 percent of self-identified Republicans in the states with party registration, according to the Civis data.
The problem for Trump is that his campaign may not have the turnout operation necessary to mobilize all of his supporters.
Worse, some states don't allow voters registered with the other party to participate in partisan primaries. This group of states includes some favorable to Trump, like Florida, Pennsylvania and New York.
purr4mance: oh, but i do understand and the polls i listed are not worthless as they speak for themselves.
Registered Democrats make up just 8 percent of self-identified Republicans.
the other side of the equation that you so conveniently forgot to mention is all the registered republicans that are one of Mr. Trump's weakest groups. Another turnout challenge for Mr. Trump is that he commands the support of many people who are unlikely to vote. Civis found him winning 40 percent of the vote among those it gave less than a 20 percent chance of participating in the general election — let alone in the primary. He held 29 percent among those who had greater than an 80 percent chance of voting in the November election.
Mr. Trump’s campaign will need to mobilize these less-likely voters to maximize his strength. But the challenge shouldn’t be overstated, either. Registered Democrats make up just 8 percent of self-identified Republicans in the states with party registration, according to the Civis data.The problem for Trump is that his campaign may not have the turnout operation necessary to mobilize all of his supporters.
Worse, some states don't allow voters registered with the other party to participate in partisan primaries. This group of states includes some favorable to Trump, like Florida, Pennsylvania and New York.
Once again, Purr... for the THIRD time. My point was that Bernie Sanders is only "relevant" if he wins the Democratic nomination, which is highly unlikely. If he does not, your previous poll about him beating all the GOP'ers is completely moot.
Just out of curiosity though, do you think regular Democrats will vote for a guy who only registered as a Democrat last year and just to run in this election?
WhatUwish4: Once again, Purr... for the THIRD time. My point was that Bernie Sanders is only "relevant" if he wins the Democratic nomination, which is highly unlikely. If he does not, your previous poll about him beating all the GOP'ers is completely moot.
NOW do you get it?
why do you keep ASSUMING i don't understand what you wish to happen during this election? for the third time, i absolutely get it.
my point ONCE AGAIN is that 27 percent of the undecided vote could go to bernie sanders a long with the other registered democrats.
at this point in the election process it is to early to tell what may actually happen. i was pointing out what may be POSSIBLE with the polling information that is out there.
purr4mance: why do you keep ASSUMING i don't understand what you wish to happen during this election? for the third time, i absolutely get it.
my point ONCE AGAIN is that 27 percent of the undecided vote could go to bernie sanders a long with the other registered democrats.
at this point in the election process it is to early to tell what may actually happen. i was pointing out what may be POSSIBLE with the polling information that is out there.
I am "assuming" that because every time you respond you are not on the same subject.
WhatUwish4: Just out of curiosity though, do you think regular Democrats will vote for a guy who only registered as a Democrat last year and just to run in this election?
Those that don't want Hillary as POTUS certainly will..
2intrigued: In my opinion, neither of the two but then again it's up to U.S. citizens to choose which one will do the least damage.
After viewing an hour long video of one of Trump's rallies, I'm even more convinced that he doesn't have what it takes to become POTUS. In my opinion, it was like watching an hour long train wreck. And the sad thing is, I watched it.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »