The leading lady in my harem asked me if there was anyway of pleasing me more. I suggested she watched Dallas cowboys cheerleaders and try to get the ladies to work out a dance routine in similar outfits. Also, I found that belly dancing was particularly stimulating and perhaps she could also arrange training in that form of dance with appropriate clothing. One thing that I did find annoying was when I lay down on the chaise longue, and was fed grapes, the pips began to accumulate in my mouth and It was necessary to spit them out. Perhaps the pips could be removed before feeding me. That was all I could think of at the time.
If any of you bloggers can think of any more additional improvements my harem could make, please feel free to suggest.
I think gay people etc., seem to think they are something special and enjoy prancing about in an exhibitionist manner. They even have their own flag, which means that anything with a rainbow design is no longer a choice for the majority. Perhaps heterosexuals should also have an emblem and display it openly in car windows and on buildings. Perhaps a badge could be worn to make it clear a person's sexuality. What do you think?
Are they part of a cover up to conceal the truth about UFO'S and extra terrestrial beings that have visited our planet and in some cases communicated with or abducted individuals? Are they themselves alien creatures trying to ensure that we do not discover their existence until they are ready to take control of the world? There are thousands of files describing visits to people who have witnessed sightings of inter planetary craft, and instructions not to mention what they have seen. Roswell, New Mexico, USA, on the 8th July 1947 is one example of attempts by the government to conceal the crashing of a saucer shaped disc and the recovery of alien bodies. There were witnesses but their story was explained away by the event being only weather balloons. This is just one event in thousands.
Apart from the likely characters on this site, has anyone experienced events to substantiate the saying?
Why is it considered not acceptable for women to be circumcised, yet male babies still go through a similar experience and they have no choice in the matter. Apparently the excuse is either for health reasons or a requirement of a particular religious order. Shouldn't this practice be stopped and boys given the option when they are old enough to make the decision themselves?
Is it time that we armed ourselves for protection due to the increasing number of terrorist attacks? Even if we carried a knife, it would enable some form of defence to help ward off characters who were a dangerous threat to ourselves and others in close proximity. By the time police or security forces arrive, much of the damage has been done. Without a weapon of some sort, we are always vulnerable to attack.
Do you feel that it is unnatural to see women or girls playing games like football or cricket or rugby? Is their femininity lost when they participate in these games? Would it be better if they concentrated in the sciences such as domestic science, where they can learn all about cooking, sewing and how to maintain a home? I am sure that their talents would be better utilised and prepare them for marriage. How would some religious ladies cope with running down a field wearing full length robes and their faces covered. Doing a pole vault or high jump would be disastrous. They would always come last in swimming.
Do you think that sometime in the future, babies will be born with a mobile phone in their hand? They will have evolved the ability to mutate in order that an object their parents etc would have depended on so much would be natural in the babies formation. I think that Chinese women in particular would be the first to adapt as I always see them walking around wherever they are, looking down at their phone.
hairstyle and wear trousers with quilted sleeveless jacket. This seems to be some kind of accepted uniform look. Is it because they have given up trying to look feminine? That must be the answer, unless you can tell me otherwise.
Is there a section of every government intelligence agency that has the responsibility to extinguish the life of an individual, if they pose a threat to their country? Should this be acceptable in the world we live and is it essential for the existence of such an operational force? In the hands of a powerful nation, could such power be abused?
An example is of a Russian agent who defected to Britain and was killed by Polonium (radio active substance) in his tea after meeting in a hotel in London. The Russian government denied involvement, but how was the Polonium obtained and who else would have sanctioned such a plot?
What happens then?
1. If you are religious then you would wait until you had passed away to be reunited with your partner.
2. If you are religious, but decide to begin a relationship with another person, then you must be a hypocrite. You may use an excuse such as, " Well I'm sure my ex partner wouldn't want me to live without loving someone else and indulging in s*xual gymnastics."
A rubbish excuse as it is really just the same as being unfaithful and showing no concern for a partner who was in this world.
3. If you are not religious, then you are free to indulge in whatever your conscience permits.
Is this the case?