To help you better understand the impending Mueller report on Trump
In the NY Times;In response to:
The Mueller Report Is Coming. Here’s What to Expect.
A concise report will probably act as a “road map” to investigation for the Democratic House — and to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors.
By Neal K. Katyal
Mr. Katyal was an acting solicitor general under President Barack Obama.
Feb. 21, 2019
The special counsel Robert Mueller will apparently soon turn in a report to the new attorney general, William Barr. Sure, there is still a lot of activity, including subpoenas, flying around, but that shouldn’t stop Mr. Mueller.
The report is unlikely to be a dictionary-thick tome, which will disappoint some observers. But such brevity is not necessarily good news for the president. In fact, quite the opposite.
For months, the president’s lawyers have tried to discredit Mr. Mueller and this report, but their efforts may have backfired. A concise Mueller report might act as a “road map” to investigation for the Democratic House of Representatives — and it might also lead to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors. A short Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.
The report is unlikely to be lengthy by design: The special counsel regulations, which I had the privilege of drafting in 1999, envision a report that is concise, “a summary” of what he found. And Mr. Mueller’s mandate is limited: to look into criminal activity and counterintelligence matters surrounding Russia and the 2016 election, as well as any obstruction of justice relating to those investigations.
The regulations require the attorney general to give Congress a report, too. The regulations speak of the need for public confidence in the administration of justice and even have a provision for public release of the attorney general’s report. In a world where Mr. Mueller was the only investigator, the pressure for a comprehensive report to the public would be overwhelming.
This is where the “witch hunt” attacks on Mr. Mueller may have backfired. For 19 months, Mr. Trump and his team have had one target to shoot at, and that target has had limited jurisdiction. But now the investigation resembles the architecture of the internet, with many different nodes, and some of those nodes possess potentially unlimited jurisdiction. Their powers and scope go well beyond Mr. Mueller’s circumscribed mandate; they go to Mr. Trump’s judgment and whether he lied to the American people. They also include law enforcement investigations having nothing to do with Russia, such as whether the president directed the commission of serious campaign finance crimes, as federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have already stated in filings. These are all critical matters, each with serious factual predicates already uncovered by prosecutors.
Had Mr. Trump and his coterie done nothing wrong, they would have had little to fear from the special counsel, and a report from Mr. Mueller that cleared him would be the gold seal of approval. But Mr. Trump’s behavior, including his dangling of pardons to witnesses in the investigation, makes total exoneration unlikely, even though it is enormously difficult to prosecute crimes with international dimensions and assertions of privilege. The investigation has been further clouded by the fact that people in Mr. Trump’s inner circle lied repeatedly when it came to Russia (that long list includes Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone).
The Mueller Report Is Coming. Here’s What to Expect.
A concise report will probably act as a “road map” to investigation for the Democratic House — and to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors.
By Neal K. Katyal
Mr. Katyal was an acting solicitor general under President Barack Obama.
Feb. 21, 2019
The special counsel Robert Mueller will apparently soon turn in a report to the new attorney general, William Barr. Sure, there is still a lot of activity, including subpoenas, flying around, but that shouldn’t stop Mr. Mueller.
The report is unlikely to be a dictionary-thick tome, which will disappoint some observers. But such brevity is not necessarily good news for the president. In fact, quite the opposite.
For months, the president’s lawyers have tried to discredit Mr. Mueller and this report, but their efforts may have backfired. A concise Mueller report might act as a “road map” to investigation for the Democratic House of Representatives — and it might also lead to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors. A short Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.
The report is unlikely to be lengthy by design: The special counsel regulations, which I had the privilege of drafting in 1999, envision a report that is concise, “a summary” of what he found. And Mr. Mueller’s mandate is limited: to look into criminal activity and counterintelligence matters surrounding Russia and the 2016 election, as well as any obstruction of justice relating to those investigations.
The regulations require the attorney general to give Congress a report, too. The regulations speak of the need for public confidence in the administration of justice and even have a provision for public release of the attorney general’s report. In a world where Mr. Mueller was the only investigator, the pressure for a comprehensive report to the public would be overwhelming.
This is where the “witch hunt” attacks on Mr. Mueller may have backfired. For 19 months, Mr. Trump and his team have had one target to shoot at, and that target has had limited jurisdiction. But now the investigation resembles the architecture of the internet, with many different nodes, and some of those nodes possess potentially unlimited jurisdiction. Their powers and scope go well beyond Mr. Mueller’s circumscribed mandate; they go to Mr. Trump’s judgment and whether he lied to the American people. They also include law enforcement investigations having nothing to do with Russia, such as whether the president directed the commission of serious campaign finance crimes, as federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have already stated in filings. These are all critical matters, each with serious factual predicates already uncovered by prosecutors.
Had Mr. Trump and his coterie done nothing wrong, they would have had little to fear from the special counsel, and a report from Mr. Mueller that cleared him would be the gold seal of approval. But Mr. Trump’s behavior, including his dangling of pardons to witnesses in the investigation, makes total exoneration unlikely, even though it is enormously difficult to prosecute crimes with international dimensions and assertions of privilege. The investigation has been further clouded by the fact that people in Mr. Trump’s inner circle lied repeatedly when it came to Russia (that long list includes Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone).
(continued in my first comment below)
Comments (44)
However, thanks for 'pushing that envelope'.
E - I "might" but it is getting more & more less likely. As Chat pointed out in the comments below another of my blogs, (something like) " there's enough other shoes dropping to open up a flea market". Even Nixon didn't have 17 separate investigations focused on him. Trump has done some very bad things.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $$$$$
.....
And that's JUST for Impeachment.
If the bet was that 67 U.S. Senators are gonna convict & remove from office...
During a political cycle?!?!
That couldn't happen even in a Bizzaro World alternate universe.
Only a true idiot can ignore what the DNC, obozo regime, and certain agencies have done for this fabricated investigation.
Any convictions that have been carried out have not been actual or true convictions but absolute corruption from the highest levels. No crimes existed until the DNC and clinton fabricated dossier were kept from the investigations they deserve.
Those same "elites" say Russia tried interfering. The only true evidence of interference is with the obozo regime itself. The warning sign is the demonrats own proof that russian bots can be used by any one to sway and outcome. Most likely not Russian tactics at all but demonrat tactics for the gullible.
Demonrats deserve to be in front of a military firing squad starting with the obozo regime.
But it kinda explains our esteemed OP's tiresome obsession with this over the past two years, no?
It's only money, Jim. And money's the most replaceable commodity in the world.
You'll get over it. You'll see
Couldn't have said it any more clearly myself, ep
It is about the worst president in US history and his record of illegal actions.
It's about having a volatile unqualified harmful inappropriate individual at the helm
to this country and the danger he is to it. All you seem to be focused on is $,
because it seems that is what is important to YOU.
The REASON I bet the $100 in the first place is because I KNEW it was just a matter of time before he would do something illegal that would cause his impeachment.
It is YOU who are focused on money, not me.
Indeed, what I post on here has no influence whatsoever on me winning or losing that bet.
I only answered your questions about it. I never brought it up.
Indeed, it was the other person who brought up the bet to me.
He offered the bet and I accepted it.
May I remind you, that this blog is about the impending Mueller report.
Try to stay focused on the topic, rather than personal issues.
He only wants to see justice prevail.
And by the way, the direct costs of the Mueller investigation is about $27 Million.
However, the government made money, not lost money on the investigation from
all the property seizures, especially from Manafort.
( see, notice I'm helping you along once again Jimbo)...is that you & THEM--for reasons eYe will never fathom-- are so astonishingly ignorant of history-'-
And the history of the minute reveals the Govt. Is getting B I G G E R under Trump ( ala space force ) and thus the red ink is getting redder & crimson by the hour....you may return now to your TV delusion.
1999. Raising
.o86. He'll
2085. teach contrary } the purpose of TV as explained in the Greek concordance.
The Mueller report was NEVER intended to be the 'be all end all'.
That's a common total misinterpretation.
It is only the first prerequisite step.
Think of it as the quiet before the storm as the clouds begin to gather on the horizon.
Some are much too near sighted to see it happening. Others see it, but ignore it.
However, some understand what's truly brewing.
Nixon was smart enough to resign, as he understood.
Votes are private. I don't know who actually voted which way.
Regardless, I didn't state that because their OPINION differed from mine.
I stated it because they either failed to do the appropriate research on Trump, or didn't heed it and voted for a demagogue who has ties to both the Russian and American/Italian mafias. They SHOULD have known better BEFORE voting.
This resulted in the election of OFFICIALLY the worst US president in history.
Amazing that someone would point out my statement as not being nice, when they
don't say anything about the direct statements that are much worse by Trump and Trump voters. Where are your objections to that ?
You keep trying to identify ONE thing as the reason Trump will be impeached.
But, it is not only one thing. There are many things and may be even more things
by the time he is actually impeached.
Nonetheless, it takes time and careful procedures to oust a sitting president.
It does not happen over night.
The tipping point occurred long ago. The legal process has already started.
There will be follow through.
..and even though I'm a clever little gun control baby...eYe take a back seat to
Nicholson68.
"The deepest story ever told through moving pictures"
This vid. Will deep state your mind into brutal $ubmission. One band [ Rush.
One massive de Code.
Get hold of The Don, point out what you've accomplished here and GET ON THE PAYROLL.
You'll make up that $100 bad bet in jig time
It subsequently, won't be me impeaching Trump, it will be Congress.
In fairness, ep, it was not specified WHICH year's end.
'23
It certainly does not imply immediately.
I do not give them time limits, nor have I ever implied that I did.
Indeed, if it were up to me, I would prefer they do a thorough job.
As that is corrected, he has a smaller chance of repeating.
Of course, the impeachment on the horizon will also greatly interfere with a repeat
of Trump.
Who did you vote for ?
And....even though it's off topi c
Who would you vote for between
Non- magical GOLDWATER
Or magic LBJ ?
This would help me to help you
With our ongoing investimigations.