Democrats now considering not sending articles of impeachment to Senate

Just when you thought the FARCE couldn't get any worse rolling on the floor laughing

We really are living in ClownWorld. The implosion is unbelievable. The most rigged, unconstitutional, and blatantly unfair 'impeachment inquiry' in history, and now that they led their congress members off a cliff and somehow got them to vote for it, talk from Democrats is that may not send the articles of impeachment over to the Senate

Of course the Constitution makes it clear that the House is DUTY BOUND to send the articles over

Whoever's writing this script really has a sense of humor

rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing

wine
Post Comment

Comments (34)

The Dems are crazy....crazy like a fox. It's like this: 42% of Americans are red and 42% are blue. That will not change. But the remaining 14% are either independents like me or are undecided. That 14% is what this seemingly futile exercise is all about. PERCEPTION is everything. "IF" the Dems can move the needle of the 14% their way come Nov.2020, then they will have succeeded.
Typo:16%
As usual, you are confused.

McConnell already admitted that he is not unbiased.
McConnell already admitted, that he is taking cues from the White House attorneys.
McConnell has stated that he does not want witnesses.
The Senate is SUPPOSED to be an unbiased jury.
Who ever heard of a trial where witnesses weren't permitted ?

Thus, Pelosi is using the articles as a bargaining chip.
The closer it is to the election, the worse for Trump.
Thus, she will delay until the Senate trial at least has rules fair to the president AND fair to the American public. The more time it takes, the worst for Trump. No problem for Pelosi. She already got the result she expected. head banger
I also agree with N. thumbs up
Trump said that He was a red blood bleeding Patriot just like you. He will never give up on you. We are team America Red blood bleeding Patriots. What College does Democrats Harbor?
I'm not sure that the House is required to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate. But I am sure that if they don't do it in a timely way, President Trump can move to dismiss the impeachment on the grounds that it is a violation of his right to a speedy trial. It works the same way as a judicial trial.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IS NO LONGER A GOVERNING BODY OF AMERICA.
As usual, you have your beliefs......and again will be proven wrong later. head banger
The way Trump has historicly delayed 100's of trials, "speedy" is a relative term. laugh
It will happen before November. head banger
the Senate is under Republicans control majority

laugh angel cool confused

nothing will happens there to go against Trump
Judge Napolitano: Pelosi has constitutional obligation to send impeachment articles to Senate.

W - True. But when ?
J. You'll have to ask the judge.
I'm guessing she will eventually hand them over sometime before November.
The sooner McConnell permits witnesses, the sooner she will do it.
Also, since McConnell admitted he is biased and consulting with White House attorneys, he should recuse himself from the trial. head banger
@ 1:25 -

very mad very mad very mad very mad ... It sounds EXACTLY like CS Blogs!!!!
rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing

cowboy
@ 0:30 in the vid in my comment above roll eyes

Some (such as Bloomberg) have expressed doubt that Sleepy sleep Joe could beat a DRUM like a drum - let alone The Don laugh

cowboy
Attention Democrats: Hillary will still NOT be reporting for work tomorrow at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.laugh
Yes, after all the hand-wringing and haranguing, guess who's still president. wink
Plus Jim, every American is assured a fast and speedy trial.
W - Here in the USA, some people wait years for a trial and not many are speedy.
Some trials with juries take many months.
Regardless, a trial should allow witnesses. That's normal operating procedure. head banger
The jury should not be colluding with the attorneys for the accused. scold
^^^^
you mean like the Democrat Senators did with the Clinton White House in Bubba Clinton's Impeachment-Trial?laugh
POTUS has been indicted for impeachment, not impeached. Whether he will be impeached will not be confirmed until the end of the Senate hearings come early February 2020.

can anybody confirm this , not the early February part .
Speaker Pelosi may be holding onto the Articles Of Impeachment in an attempt to dictate how the Impeachment Trial be conducted in the Senate.

Yesterday - literally YESTERDAY - House 'Crats claimed Impeachment MUST be undertaken IMMEDIATELY because allowing Trump to remain in office posed a threat to the '20 Election and the existence of the Republic itself.

Today - Madame Speaker plays a delaying game playball & plans to drag it through 'til after Holiday Recess gotta go

It's been suggested this a glaring overreach by the Speaker of the HOUSE, and the Senate should vote (by simple majority) that the process has not been completed as laid out in the Constitution, is thus null & void and so end this ridiculous farce.

The bald faced hypocrisy in the House beggars belief.

cowboy
she's going for broke hoping to get passed november election with a demo senate in control , hey what does she have to lose .
"Regardless, a trial should allow witnesses. That's normal operating procedure. head banger "

Sooo ....
House 'Crats didn't bother to get to those witnesses when it was under THEIR jurisdiction and now hold up the procedure unless THEY get to run the show in the SENATE?!?!

confused

Frickin' NUTZ!! crazy

cowboy
if they gain control of the senate they will allow witnesses alright , theirs .
That'll be featured in "Impeachment Term II - The Sequel", ep.
laugh

cowboy
the real funny thing , if gop regain the house they can expunge what the dnc did yesterday .
It's not that they "didn't bother".
It was that they were blocked by Trump.
A recent federal court decision reverses that.
How much time do they have and is there a time limit for sending the articles to the Senate?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^well,you might want to open your Peepers!
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.
Meet the Author of this Blog
chancer_returnsonline today!

chancer_returns

Dublin, Ireland

Myself: Up front. Honest. What you see is what you get. [read more]