Breaking News ! The New York Times got access to Trump's tax returns for the past 2 decades



Post Comment

Comments (76)

Christmas comes early this year!
It did for the NY Times.

I'm holding out for a big Biden win.
The only relevant issue is if he broke the law. If he didn't, then all it will be is a bunch of members of Congress trying to attack him for taking advantage of the tax code that Congress wrote. However, now that it seems fair game to have tax returns released to the public, I think Trump should sign an executive order requiring that all elected officials release their tax returns post haste. Now THAT would really throw the cat amongst the pigeons.
News Report on the NYT story in the OP -

cowboy
Have been wondering why Trump forfeited his salary for four years, he did not have to do this..............
Yep timing is rarely coincidental in politics. Biden is probably rehearsing his lines if and when he's asked about it in one of the debates. DoJ will likely start a criminal investigation into the leaks to the NYT also since they were obviously illegal. I don't believe Biden has released his tax returns BTW??? And his Senate records are under seal? Doesn't exactly scream confidence for a man that held political office for nearly half a century that he wants to keep his records hidden
That's certainly AN important issue and the government feels he has.
That's why he's under audit and been battling it in court.

But, there are other issues too, including his lies to the public regarding the money he's supposedly earned.
Certainly not in the last 20 years. He's paid a total of $1,500.
Where are you getting that figure from ?
mic - did you really expect Trump NOT to lie about his taxes ? He lies about just about everything.
I notice that he STILL did not release his tax returns, even to refute the NY Times story.
Gee, I wonder why.
Yet the NYT doesn't have to "prove" anything? Right? They can claim anything and call it anonymous and it's ok? You would think with something this big - they'd show what they got. Innocent until proven guilty.
Jim. Biden bad. now you know and what you do with it makes you responsible. if Biden wins.
Sorry if it's bad timing for you. laugh

Do you think maybe the New York Times getting a look might be linked to the Southern District of NY recently obtaining Trump's tax returns as it prepares itself for indictments upon Trump's term ending ?
c - what I know, is that Biden in MUCH better than Trump.
Jim, you are making a grave mistake. i'll hurt you more than me
Innocent or guilty of what ? Paying only $750 in taxes for the last 2 years and essentially nothing
for the previous years ? That's not a crime, IF he only earned a small amount of money.
Interesting. How do you intend to hurt me ?
No I don't think that at all. I think that if they really had a copy of anything, it would be plastered across the front page. Everyone knows how the NYT feels about the President and it's not like they've ever misspoke about him before so I'll believe it when I see it. And even then I'd wonder if it were true. The NYT is not as above the board as you want to believe when it comes to Trump.
i meant "it'll hurt you". Jim, you are like a bug that flies around annoying but i won't be the one that squashes you
OR ... He hires top tier accountants & tax lawyers - Which he undoubtedly Does.
He'd likely save $$$$ if he paid a ton of taxes & told the mega-buck numbers jugglers & shysters, "You're Fired!"

The REAL takeaway from the story may be that the Tax Code needs revision to close Loopholes.

cowboy
Keeping Secret and Top Secret emails in your private server seems rather stupid to me. But at least it was truthful. She did do that as well as clean out a bunch of things that she shouldn't - accidentally of course. And as far as Comey goes - well we all know how well he's done uh oh So let me see the forms and form my own opinion. Otherwise it's just hearsay The bs from both sides will continue for another 5 weeks..
Many have wrongly understood the Hillary/Comey issue from 2016. He was trying to HELP her not hurt her. They ASSUMED she would be POTUS and so Comey did a "for show" TV appearance where he claimed to exonerate her (even though he had no power to do so and clear crimes were uncovered). The plan? They didn't want "POTUS" Hillary to have to face investigation from an incoming Republican House majority. Oopsie. The plan didn't work out.
That's one of the things Hillary wanted to do and what Biden wants to do.
Rather odd, that you back the most prolific liar in the history of US politics, but you
doubt the investigative reporting of the NY Times.
So does The Don ...
What they Want to do is One thing - What gets through Congress is Another ... sigh

cowboy
He's probably paid out more in hush money for affairs than he has in taxes. scold
Certainly in the last 20 years he did.
Yes, she has a real A rated charity that helps people world-wide, un-like the corrupt Trump foundation,
that he had to dismantle, because he was using the money for personal expenses and personal business expenses.
Gimme a break Jim. Everyone knows Hillary was running a pay-for-play scheme with a charity as the convenient front. Mega salaries for friends and families. Massive donations from people connected to the Uranium One scandal. Oh, and the people of Haiti are still wondering where all that money promised went to. Donations to the Clinton Foundation went off a cliff post 2016. And don't think it's coz people felt "less charitable". It's because a politician is "less useful" when not in office cowboy
c_r - actually the salaries were below the guidelines for an A rated charity.
You are simply spreading lies fed to you.

SERIOUSLY?! rolling on the floor laughing

See beginning @ 7:55 -

(The Clintons) "... are Massively corrupt - it's not even Close ... She's the Ultimate establishment insider ... People can smell it on them - They can FEEL it on them!"
Unless the "people" wink are afflicted with a Critical Case of TDS.

BTW - It's Not a Right Wing-Nut hit piece scold That's from a Leftie ... very mad

cowboy
merc - with the extreme amount of dishonesty I see on here, it would not surprise me.
The supporters for Trump don't care about his lies and corruption. They don't.
c - I wouldn't trust any of them.
Your so poor you live on bacon bones to make soup..Get back to me when you can afford to eat properly!~
At all cost Trump's first and second wives our holding rubber checks..rolling on the floor laughing
Like you ignored my very clear comment about the drones assassinations a few days ago when you were trying to project Trump as Mother Theresa incarnate?

I'll try and read your post again, but y'know, paragraphs. They are not easy to read, so I do frequently bypass your comments.

I imagine some of mine aren't easy to read for many people, but I don't think that one about the drones was one of them. Most of it was a quote from the Reprieve website.
He paid more to Stormy Daniels rolling on the floor laughing
He wrote off $70,000 for hair expenses rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing
It's always astonishing how Trump supporters so easily accept and dismiss his inadequacies and, above all, his lies and his dishonest and fraudulent activities. Some of the comments in this blog defending his tax evasions would be laughable if it wasn't do disturbing. It's not acceptable.

The only way they counter facts about Trump's numerous proclivities is to attack Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, all Democrats and the Democratic party. It's understandable, of course, as they have no plausible defense for their gold plated idol. Trump is and always has been a crook and a liar.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.

About this Blog

by JimNastics
created Sep 2020
2,018 Views
Last Viewed: 44 mins ago
Last Commented: Sep 2020
Last Edited: Sep 2020
3 Likes
Last Liked: Sep 2020
JimNastics has 1,965 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?