Data on Allergic reactions to Covid 19 Vaccine.
Since the Misinformation is rife by the usual suspects, I thought some actual data from Doctors might be in order. Since this paper mentions the word "Anaphalaxis" Here is a definition from Wikipedia.In response to: Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that is rapid in onset and may cause death. It typically causes more than one of the following: an itchy rash, throat or tongue swelling, shortness of breath, vomiting, lightheadedness, low blood pressure. These symptoms typically come on over minutes to hours.
Common causes include insect bites and stings, foods, and medications. Other causes include latex exposure and exercise. Additionally, cases may occur without an obvious reason. The mechanism involves the release of mediators from certain types of white blood cells triggered by either immunologic or non-immunologic mechanisms. Diagnosis is based on the presenting symptoms and signs after exposure to a potential allergen.
Common causes include insect bites and stings, foods, and medications. Other causes include latex exposure and exercise. Additionally, cases may occur without an obvious reason. The mechanism involves the release of mediators from certain types of white blood cells triggered by either immunologic or non-immunologic mechanisms. Diagnosis is based on the presenting symptoms and signs after exposure to a potential allergen.
Heres the data
In response to: During December 14 to 23, 2020, after administration of a reported 1?893?360 first doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (1?177?527 in women, 648?327 in men, and 67?506 with sex of recipient not reported),3 CDC identified 21 case reports submitted to VAERS that met Brighton Collaboration case definition criteria for anaphylaxis, corresponding to an estimated rate of 11.1 cases per million doses administered. Four patients (19%) were hospitalized (including 3 in intensive care), and 17 (81%) were treated in an emergency department; 20 (95%) are known to have been discharged home or had recovered at the time of the report to VAERS. No deaths from anaphylaxis were reported.
Table -
Median interval from vaccine receipt to symptom onset was 13 minutes (range, 2-150 minutes); 15 patients (71%) had onset within 15 minutes; 18 (86%) had onset within 30 minutes.3 The most common symptoms and signs were urticaria, angioedema, rash, and a sense of throat closure. Seventeen (81%) of 21 patients with anaphylaxis had a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, including to drugs or medical products, foods, and insect stings; 7 (33%) had experienced an episode of anaphylaxis in the past, including one after receipt of rabies vaccine and another after receipt of influenza A(H1N1) vaccine (Table). During the same period, VAERS identified 83 cases of nonanaphylaxis allergic reactions after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.3 Commonly reported symptoms in nonanaphylaxis allergic reactions included pruritus, rash, itchy and scratchy sensations in the throat, and mild respiratory symptoms.
Table -
Median interval from vaccine receipt to symptom onset was 13 minutes (range, 2-150 minutes); 15 patients (71%) had onset within 15 minutes; 18 (86%) had onset within 30 minutes.3 The most common symptoms and signs were urticaria, angioedema, rash, and a sense of throat closure. Seventeen (81%) of 21 patients with anaphylaxis had a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, including to drugs or medical products, foods, and insect stings; 7 (33%) had experienced an episode of anaphylaxis in the past, including one after receipt of rabies vaccine and another after receipt of influenza A(H1N1) vaccine (Table). During the same period, VAERS identified 83 cases of nonanaphylaxis allergic reactions after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.3 Commonly reported symptoms in nonanaphylaxis allergic reactions included pruritus, rash, itchy and scratchy sensations in the throat, and mild respiratory symptoms.
11 cases per million is 0.00011% chance. The misinformation peddlers are saying the disease is has only a 0.01% chance of death (actually approx 2.7%) and the high rate of reactions to the vaccine is a reason why you shouldn't take it.
In fact the rate of reaction is 1000 times less than even their lies about the fatality of COVID, and the rate of death is 0%. Its FAR safer than COVID-19 even by their twisted metrics.
You can read the rest of the paper by yourself. It's only 2 pages and an easy read.
Comments (29)
That was all you,the rest is SirTs info.
BTW anyone who knows the severe reactions can easily obtain a EpiPen to have in a handbag or an emergency car kit.
I commented only to assist those who have the lesser reaction, which you inferred, from being
lumped together with the other terminal reactions.
They can and do prevent their potential harm,whenever possible but unpredictable reactions can only be prevented with honest reporting on every incident.
Really?
And here I was thinking that YOU and HIM are the same azzholes
wow thats so silly of me
Literally.
Twitter has even tried to close accounts that comment to their own self under another name.
Personas become the perception of a reader as well, an assumption or stereotype.
territory and pretty much missed out on that whole phase on CS.
Sometimes real life takes a precedence.
I will leave that retelling to our old-timers.
Why would anyone set up a blog and then not allow others to comment on it? Seems like a contradiction does it not?
with anaphylaxis
had a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, including to drugs or medical products, foods, and insect stings.
That is me and why I can not chance it.
Do you think I should, and use the antidote.
If you will allow me to briefly hi-jack SirT,
Why would anyone set up a blog and then not allow others to comment on it? Seems like a contradiction does it not?
Some people are not interested in thoughts but to push a false idea of the world. They want to create a flat earth.
with anaphylaxis
had a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, including to drugs or medical products, foods, and insect stings.
That is me and why I can not chance it.
Do you think I should, and use the antidote.
(1) None, zero, of the reactions were FATAL
(2) That's 17 out of 1.9 million people. I dont think that there were only 17 people in that group that had serious allergies. The report oes not say, but I am willing to bet that there was 1000 people in that group with allergies. If I told you that only 17 people out of 1000 people with serious allergies would ahve a reaction and that reaction would be non fatal it would sound a lot better, wouldn't it?
(3) There was no, zero. Bells Palsy reaction, and Bells Palsy is treatable in any case. You mentioned bells Palsy too.
Frankly I think you are looking for excuses not to take the vaccine and wouldn't want to take it if there was a zero chance of a reaction (just in case)
Basically take the link and discuss it with your doctor. I'm pretty sure he would say a Tiny risk of a reaction would be worth it, and if they know you have allergies they will observe you in the half an hour after the dose to respond if you have a reaction. That;s being armed with knowledge and using it to prepare, not using knowledge to avoid doing the right thing.
In Africa they have people fighting the Polio vaccine with lies that its being poisoned. Polio is a LOT less dangerous than COVID-19, 95% of people who contract Polio have no symptoms, and 90 % of the people that do have flu like symptoms for a week. Its a baby compared with COVID-19
The Elitist Depopulators would be Required to Tell Us ...
"Norway Sounds Alarm As 23 Elderly Patients Die After Pfizer Vax" ...
Re the 1st vid - If you have allergies, consult a physician.
One from J & J was only about 66% effective (72% in US & 57% in South Africa) in preventing getting the disease, but none of the 20,000 recipients died from Covid-19. Thus, it seems effective in preventing the worst cases of the disease. It also only requires one dose and does not need sub-zero temperatures for storage.
The difference in effectiveness in different countries, may be due to viral variants.
The second is from Novavax. It had a 89% effective rate in the UK 15,000 person phase 3 trial), but also was much less effective against the South African variant.
Whatever.
Re vaxes & the Profit Motive -
Especially(!) when that profit motive is coupled with immunity from legal action for any damages. If a makers NEEDS that kind of protection for its vax, might they be more apt to cut corners? ...
OTOH -
Some folks are concerned that vaxes developed so quickly weren't tested adequately.
The Extremely short development time has been explained by the vaxes being developed from existing vaxes for similar viruses such as SARS & MERS.
So I guess that's Kinda reassuring ...