Factcheck - Liars Lying about Lying

Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
theswash.com ^ | 8/27/2012 11 | matchdoctor
Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group

If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."

That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.

Just because they use a name that implies unbiased assessments, doesn't mean that they provide them. You can call your Web site anything you want. I can set up a web site called thetruth.org or realfacts.com or stopthelies.org and post any kind of biased political propaganda I want on it. The name means nothing. And in the case of sites like factcheck.org, the name is intentionally misleading and deceptive. But it isn't the only so called "fact check" site that is a fraud. There are others.

Think about it. Would you rely on any particular Web site to get the "truth?" Anyone honest would tell you that you should NOT rely solely on them to get your facts. You should get them by considering many different and sources, with different points of view and opinions and arrive at what you believe to be the truth by using your own God given senses. Only con artists purport to be the de facto source of truth.

If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.

The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:
....
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.

Post Comment

Comments (4)

How pathetic, so you decide to use a fake site to Maligne a site that has been prised by all sections of the political spectrum for their transparency and UNBIASED reporting.
What's more you completely fail to mention the other site links posted that support and prove the fallacy that H. Clinton sold uranium to the Russian.

If you can post Far-right propaganda sites why can't others post central or slightly left sites?

Oh yes because you are always right and delete anyone who dares to have an opposing view.
As for you travelling, I don't believe a word of it, no one with such a narrow mind could possibly have travelled further than their local MacDonalds,
From the L A Times..} ages ago...) Comix.

Man. ) I neglected to mention in my personal ad
......that I am a pathological liar..
Woman. } You're kidding ?
Man. ) No. I'm lying.


teddybear ...we need a Panda bear for the Ambassador.
Now this is interesting.
Our shrill and unhinged Yapping Denialists are at it again, attempting to "debunk" actual frontline doctors, immunologists, virologists and patent examiners with politically-motived, Leftist bought-and-paid-for Lie Factories.

Case in point: trying to debunk a doctor with, who?

A philosophy major, not long out of school. No evidence, whatsoever, of her having medical credentials.

Saranac Hale Spencer worked as a reporter for 10 years before joining FactCheck.org in 2017. She has covered the federal courts, local government and crime for newspapers from New York to Delaware, and she studied philosophy as a student at Cornell University.


Her hit piece? Idaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines


And of course, FACTCHECK / SCI-CHECK are politically funded and politically directed Lie Factories.

If you spend 10 years in a Communist Chinese regime, I suppose some of that Communist propaganda habit rubs off onto you.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.