USA vs China

Biden: "We made a sacred commitment to Article 5 that if in fact anyone were to invade or take action against our NATO allies, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with - Taiwan. It's not even comparable to [Afghanistan to] talk about that."

I'm not so sure this is the right stance to take with a country like China.

Crazy talk can cause a huge drift between the super powers.
confused
Post Comment

Comments (12)

It's NOT, what You're Country can do for you but it is what you can do for Chyna.

Ich bin Berliner

You reckon? laugh
"It's NOT, what You're Country can do for you but it is what you can do for Chyna."
thumbs up thumbs up thumbs up
@Butch. I'll always side with America. 5 eyes etc. If 'Chyna' takes on Taiwan, I'd back Taiwan and America.

It's getting tense. It's business time handshake

I don't back anyone MrB, their all a bunch of warpigs for control of BS money system...
So kick back and enjoy show, maybe even a bit of fireworks if any of them are more than just threats.. popcorn
Guy Fawkes must have die about 20 years ago when took out double happies and skyrockets MrB...

Anyone know who's arming Saudi Arabia now ? i'm sure the yanks have pulled their toy out of there...

I see Turkey is threatening to buy Russian war planes, good old Erdogon playing the super powers off against one another the crafty old boy...
I wouldn't have the foggiest but NZ v USA in rugby is a no brainer. uh oh
"good old Erdogon playing the super powers off against one another the crafty old boy..."

Sounds a bit like Winston Peters, the crafty old dog rolling on the floor laughing
If it comes to open warfare against Red China, it will require:

1) clearing out all burrowed-in traitors like Espy, Manning and the like. One traitor can cause the loss of a battle, or even the war.

2) committment to full-scale NBC warfare. We would be vastly outnumbered and Communists have historically been very comfortable with taking mass casualties. We must be willing to severely deplete those numbers. Thus, a kind of warfare we haven't seen in recent history.

3) Seek to recruit India, which has the human numbers and a history of border conflicts with China.

4) Go full-bore in cultivating the inner freedom movement within China itself. Perhaps a lot of bloodshed can be spared if the Chinese themselves can be helped to overthrow their CCP oppressors.

Whichever way it goes, war with China will be Total War. It won't be a case of Johnny Goes to War, America Goes to the Mall.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^that possibility existed since the fifties,and has become more real with every Decade the CCP existed!
Mao wanted for Communism to conquer the World,while the Soviets were more stealthy and cautious!
One of the causes the Soviets and China fell out over.
Hi Luke i just think all countries should lay down what they will and can do in an invasion. Then get on with talking as all countries can help each other. Human rights etc take many generations of different thinking and all countries do not evolve at same pace.

So that saying jaw jaw jaw not war war war sounds common sense to me. teddybear
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.

About this Blog

by Lukeon
created Oct 2021
623 Views
Last Viewed: Mar 20
Last Commented: Nov 2021
Lukeon has 484 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?