10 heinous lies about Kyle Rittenhouse debunked

Of all the willful lies and omissions in the media’s coverage of the Steele dossier, Brian Sicknick, the Covington kids, Jussie Smollett, the Wuhan lab, Hunter Biden’s laptop and so on, nothing beats the evil propaganda peddled about Kyle Rittenhouse.

They try to make the Rittenhouse case about race, but it’s about class, punching down at the white working-class son of a single mother because they don’t see him as fully human, and it makes them feel good.

So, let’s go through 10 lies about Rittenhouse, debunked in court:

1. He killed two black BLM protesters. All three of the men he shot in self-defense during violent riots in Kenosha on Aug. 25 last year were white.

2. He crossed state lines. He lived 20 miles from Kenosha in Antioch, Ill., with his mother and sisters. But his father, grandmother, aunt, uncle, cousins and best friend live in Kenosha.

3. Rittenhouse took an AR-15 across state lines. Esquire accused him of “terrorist tourism.” False. His rifle was kept in a safe at his best friend’s stepfather’s house in Kenosha.

4. The gun was illegal. Wrong. Under Wisconsin law, he was entitled to possess the AR-15 as a 17-year-old. The judge dismissed the gun charge, which the prosecution never should have brought.

5. Rittenhouse’s mother drove him across state lines to the riot. Wendy Rittenhouse, 46, never went to Kenosha.

6. He was an “active shooter” who took his gun to a riot looking for trouble. When the defense called out the lie in closing arguments, Scarborough had the gall to tweet that he was “embarrassed” for the lawyer.

7. Rittenhouse is a “white supremacist,” as then-candidate Joe Biden labeled him in a tweet showing the teenager’s photograph. When White House press secretary Jen Psaki was asked to explain why recently, she slyly slimed Rittenhouse again, without naming him, as a “vigilante.”

8. He “flashed white power signs” with Proud Boys. The false claim that this is a white supremacist sign comes from a 2017 hoax on the website 4chan, to punk liberals, who keep falling for it.

9. He wore surgical gloves “to cover his fingerprints.” This pearl was spread by Matthew Modine, another celebrity bigmouth. Kyle wore gloves because he was giving first aid to protesters. His face was bare, so he was hardly hiding.

10. Judge Bruce Schroeder is a “Trumpy” racist biased toward the defense. Schroeder is a Democrat, has run as a Democrat for the Wisconsin Senate and was first appointed by a Democratic governor.

Post Comment

Comments (34)

I have 2 connections to Kenosha WI. I worked for several years for a Rambler dealership as an auto mechanic. Ramblers were made in Kenosha. I also went to Kenosha once to meet what would be my future employer who I would work for over 10 years. My recollection of the city was it's a boring little mid-west town.
The best thing that Amerika could do, other than send a C-17 loaded with Democrats into the Volcano..is for all white people & brown people & purple people..
TO KILL THEIR TELEVISION S.

Coffee & TV / blur
Stop making sense / Talking heads
Govt. Plates / death Grip.
Spot on Willie.

Tucker Carlson did a couple segments on this exact topic. His theme was that the Leftist press (Die Luegenpresse), had far exceeded simple lies and was guilty of Propaganda-- an aggressive, defamatory strategy of inflammatory false accusations and scurrilous lies.

(My interpretation, his words were slightly different).

The Leftist media left truth in the rearview mirror a long time ago, and the focus now is to mislead and enrage with a continuous stream of lies.
Even an outsider can see. He's innocent. Self defence. Skate boards, rocks and pistols

He's only a young kid but is more mature than those swinging bats/skate boards.

Kyle is the type of bloke in your fox hole covering your back.
He does look a bit like audie murphy. He should have took that skateboard on his head as a love tap and kissed the person holding it. You cant kill someone with a skateboard. frustrated
Sorry but I need to bring to your attention several things you said about Rittenhouse.



1. He killed two black BLM protesters. All three of the men he shot in self-defense during violent riots in Kenosha on Aug. 25 last year were white.
WRONG. He did NOT shoot them in defense because the law says that you cannot claim self defense in a situation where you provoked the violence

4. The gun was illegal. Wrong. Under Wisconsin law, he was entitled to possess the AR-15 as a 17-year-old. The judge dismissed the gun charge, which the prosecution never should have brought.
WRONG. The reason the judge dismissed the gun charge is because according to Wisconsin law, anyone under the age of eighteen cannot possess a rifle of a certain length. Rittenhouse was 17 when he shot three people in Kenosha, killing two of them.

9. He wore surgical gloves “to cover his fingerprints.” This pearl was spread by Matthew Modine, another celebrity bigmouth. Kyle wore gloves because he was giving first aid to protesters. His face was bare, so he was hardly hiding.
WRONG. He did not give first aid to anyone. He yelled out to the crowd that he was a paramedic but when questioned in court he admitted that he lied about that and did not assist anyone.
While Kyle was clearly defending himself, I myself have avoided demonstrations where Antifa / BLM have been deployed.. and I do mean deployed.

Before DISCUS nuked the private blogs, I assembled some research done by others and it became apparent that Soros and others were financing, training and directing BLMANTIFA, in what is known as a GLADIO, or a political destabilization campaign.

What began as a contingency plan for if the Soviets overran Europe, morphed into an offensive operation used to destabilize and overthrow small regimes the Company didn't like (and sometimes they didn't like good people).

Only, this time, what had been normally a CIA dirty tricks campaign exclusively deployed overseas, had been perverted by the filth who'd been installed at the top echelons of the IC, and now directed against the American people.

I always venture abroad armed, and am cautious about inserting myself into a situation where I would have to defend myself, for exactly the reason we're seeing with young Rittenhouse.

Granted, his purpose was to be an armed presence intended to dissuade looting and burning. But BLANTIFA are trained, and indeed, the most unhinged bottomfeeders are selected. Does anyone remember the hidden video Project Veritas interviews of Hillary dirty tricks operatives Foval and Kramer?

Having an open gun in that situation would not dissuade these marginal types. They look to regular Americans as law abiding, thus would hesitate to shoot, and with that in mind, get in close and attack, exactly as they did, using unconventional weapons (skateboards, bikelocks, bear spray).
Hello Bo......When you were in the forums I spoke highly of you in threads where you mentioned your experience in the military. I still see no reason to gang up on you like some others do but I have to disagree with you on the self defense law.

The law says.....You cannot claim self defense if you were the aggressor of the violence. Example: If you went out into the street and started shooting every front door on a house. People would come out of their houses and make an attempt to stop you. By the law you cannot claim self defense against those people because they attacked you.
SA. Well I appreciate the sentiment, but you are repeating an erroneous interpretation of self defense law.

Granted, the laws are interpreted and applied differently in different jurisdictions. In places like NY, the require a Duty to Retreat, which was novel in American law, compared to what it had been for a very long time.

Generally what is required for most any self defense statute is a reasonable belief of believing oneself to be in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.

Merely having a weapon is not sufficient justification for others to attack him. But it did give rise to all the elements of self defense.
Agree with Bo here. I also saw the video clip, it looked like the wild west
and Kyle was properly thrown to the ground as far as I could see.
He had the choice of being possibly killed or to pull the trigger himself
the way it looked to me. It's a pity the whole situation with all them riots
and he will have to live with killing two. But me I would judge him mildly.
Grand.........The video you are referring to yes he was on the ground. I'm not sure if he tripped or was pushed. Yes he was kicked. That is not the video that he is claiming self defense for.

The video that he claims self defense for is when he is running towards a cluster of cars. He turned around and saw a man lunging toward him. That is the first man he killed with FOUR shots at close range.

Then he ran away and killed another man. There isn't a video of that murder. Nor is there a video of the man he shot half of his arm away but that man lived.
Good on ya Grandy. I see it the same way as well. American Laws are American Laws but from a legal point of view,,,,,I'm just surprised that Kyle didn't blow the mofos head off with a few more rounds to spare.

Kyle was running away, the law is the law. Open carry isn't the question in cowboy town. There's nothing like getting a beating with a kick in the head, scate-board or loaded revolver. He probably should have played dead with a dum dum BLM protester saying "kill whitey"

Too far fetched, yet real........coming to a town near YOU
Galrads has posted a hate sign, also called white power sign, on the blog. He put the same meme on a forum too. I hope you'll take this hate speech down.

^^^^^^^^^^
BullMalarkey!
This is the OK-sign,used by every Diver to indicate that things are indeed OK!
Educate yourself,Myrtle,before you traipse into another one!laugh
It also means 3 score & six...but only within a certain Fraternity.
The particular image chosen by Galrad has this wording.

So why choose it?
'cause NPR has about as much credibility as CNN,or the rest of the MSM-Crowd!
Yes, context is key. Read on:

The "OK" hand gesture, commonly seen as a way of indicating that all is well, has now been classified as something else: a symbol of hate.

On Thursday, the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights organization, added 36 symbols to its "Hate on Display" database including the index finger-to-thumb sign that in some corners of the Internet has become associated with white supremacy and the far right.

Oren Segal, director of the ADL's Center on Extremism, told NPR that for years on fringe online message boards such as 4chan and 8chan, the "OK" sign has been deployed in memes and other images promoting hate. Given the number of white supremacists who have adopted it, he said it can now carry a nefarious message.

"Context is always key," Segal said. "More people than not will use the OK symbol as just 'OK.' But in those cases where there's more underlining meaning, I think it's important for people to understand that it could be used, and is being used, for hate as well."
^^^^^^^^^More bla-bla,hmm?
Anything to derail the Blog!laugh
Is it over?
Kevin Mathewson

https://sign.moveon.org/petitions/charge-kevin-mathewson-as-accessory
Posting the OK hand symbol, Brave or foolish?

Watching the video of the verdict being read two things struck me:

Firstly, Rittenhouse's reaction, the way he cried and moved highlighted how much of a child he is. I find it really odd that at the time of the shootings Rittenhouse was considered a child too young to consent to sex, or drink a beer, but somehow adult enough to own, wield and use a big, feck off gun.

I feel ambivalent about the verdict and how Rittenhouse is not being held accountable for any of his actions, but I still think it's the US gun culture and glorification of violence which should be subject to an inquiry.

Secondly, Rittenhouse's legal representitive, the one sitting nearest the central aisle, did not look happy about the result at all. I wondered whether he was considering the potential backlash of the verdict and how that might affect his career, or even his safety.
I don't like that deliberate handsignal photo Fargo, as it's
hightened tentions right now. It can make people even say that Kyles wish to defend
and standing up to these vile thugs (my view)
was a provocation cos of the type of gun he had, or holding a gun at all.

So I personally think Galrads symbol here makes Kyles case worse not better.
But luckily he came out unharmed. Kyle that is.

So actually this time Myrta has a point.
But last time she had not, when gals said Brandon go.
Cos wanting the sitting pres gone is no crime.
That's been tolerated for years already.

My2c
I meant to Pedro Portugal - names and me...lol
My prayer to free Rittenhouse was answered. Thank you Lord thumbs up
@Jac

I agree with you 100%. The crying episode on the stand was the same cry when he was found not guilty. I know that people are sometimes flabbergasted when something good happens to them and they cry but this looked staged. As far as the attorney next to the aisle, something isn't right about his actions. Not one smile. Never shook hands with Rittenhouse. The attorney who made it look like he was comforting Rittenhouse really wasn't interested in showing happiness for his client.

The verdict stinks. He is a kid who most likely now thinks that everything he did was the correct thing to do and if they found me not guilty today then I don't have to worry if I do it again. But that's where he's wrong. The next time he might get burned the way he should have this time.

I felt sorry for the families in the gallery who had to sit there and listen to the clerk say that the boy who killed their sons is considered a upright standing citizen.

Wait till you see what happens if the jury finds those three men in Georgia who killed Amhaud Arbery in cold blood not guilty. If they are found not guilty you will see rioting that will take the National Guard to control.
Naturally, foreign Leftists with NO CLUE of American gun crime holding forth, as complete idiots are wont to do.

Consider the following:

murders in the United States are heavily concentrated in very small areas. Few appreciate how much of the US has no murders each year. Murder isn’t a nationwide problem. It’s a problem in a very small set of urban areas

Embedded image from another site


Embedded image from another site

America’s 25 Worst Cities are Democrat-Led
Of the top-ten “most dangerous cities” in America, according to Forbes, all have Democratic mayors. Those cities are Detroit, St. Louis, Oakland, Memphis, Birmingham, Atlanta, Baltimore, Stockton, Cleveland and Buffalo....And of the top 25 “most dangerous,” most are Democrat-led and all but one have poverty rates between 18 to 39 percent. The national average is 12.3 percent.





And when it comes to mass public shootings, the Dems created the problem, with Hillary's Gun Free (defenseless victim) Zones, where well over 95% of Mass Public Shootings have taken place in:

(Researcher John) Lott offers a final damning statistic: “With just one single exception, the attack on congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, <u>every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns.”


Leftists are stupid, and should remain silent over issues they have no clue about.
There is a saying: maybe it's a norwegian one, not sure
but it goes along the lines of -
'You know others on yourself'

A very dark interp, very suspicious motives put into
the (correct) YOUNG Kyle here.
White supremacist hmm?? that what you see?

I'm happy I don't see the word through your lenses. How dark.

Nite
My commet was to the two 'bright' ladies above your head there Bo.
If you want to fight Gun Crime in the USA, then prohibit Dems from owning guns, since gun crime is concentrated in Democrat-led areas, and committed by inner-city Yutes.
Embedded image from another site


Embedded image from another site
Oz, we're cool my gentle Viking friend.

But those who voice strong, but uninformed opinions on American gun ownership, versus Gun crime, should study more, speak less.

And there's more:

Crime in Europe and in the US: Dissecting the "Reversal of Misfortunes"

Contrary to common perceptions, today both property and violent crimes (with the exception of homicides) are more widespread in Europe than in the United States, while the opposite was true thirty years ago. We label this fact as the ‘reversal of misfortunes’. We investigate what accounts for the reversal by studying the causal impact of demographic changes, incarceration, abortion, unemployment and immigration on crime. For this we use time series data (1970–2008) from seven European countries and the United States. We find that the demographic structure of the population and the incarceration rate are important determinants of crime. Our results suggest that a tougher incarceration policy may be an effective way to contrast crime in Europe. Our analysis does not provide information on how incarceration policy should be made tougher nor does it provide an answer to the question whether such a policy would also be efficient from a cost-benefit point of view. We leave this to future research. — Paolo Buonanno, Francesco Drago, Roberto Galbiati and Giulio Zanella
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.
Meet the Author of this Blog
Willy3411

Willy3411

Lawton, Oklahoma, USA

Retired old guy. Loves sports, music, and karaoke. Not shy about singing.Love to travel. Love to go to beaches and warm weather outdoor events. U.S. Air Force Veteran. I am here for the blogs. I am an amputee. My lower leg is gone.

Any messages se [read more]

About this Blog

created Nov 18
421 Views
Last Viewed: 2 hrs ago
Last Commented: Nov 19
Willy3411 has 1,102 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?