Why to repeal if your laws were beneficial to the farmers...
His exact wording is: We couldn't convince a section of farmers that the three laws (farmers call these laws Draconian) were for their welfare........
Then he apologized for it.
.......
And lastly he announced that the said laws would be repealed on 29th. instant, the first day of coming parliament session.
........
Now all the three things are self contradictory.
If the agitating farmers are only a small fraction of the total farming community.
Then why to care for that small fraction at the cost of the welfare of the whole community...
Then if the laws are beneficial to the farming community in general, then why to repeal...
And lastly if you did nothing wrong, then what you are apologetic for....
Then the clown and now the joker, they are good event managers because of the support of the corporate. But, in the changed scenario, politics must deliver or get replaced. Though it takes time but the devil has to go.
.......
As for as the farmers movement is concerned, your theatrics won't work. It would be taken to its logical end.
The guarantee of the minimum support price, that is, MSP is the farmers second most wanted demand.
UP assembly elections, popularly termed as the the preliminary test of parliamentary elections, compelled him to repeal the draconian three laws.
Now it remains to be seen, when would the MSP be guaranteed...
Comments (1)